Originally posted by StartreaderYou may be a moralist but you sure aint no philosopher.
Rubbish.
It's a game and good sportsmanship is all.
When one plays 1.e4 what morality exists? shall ones opponent exclaim you cad and bounder that move is immoral? If they did we should call the arbiter and possibly a doctor as well. We may claim that its a 'good' move, but this has no moral connotations, good in the sense that it obeys the dictates of logic not that it is morally upright and thus so far there is not a shred of morality to be found on the chessboard itself and the original premise is sound, the reasoning excellent and the logic unassailable.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo it's more like when YOU get to the middle of the game and YOU consult some chess engine. Now that aint sportsmanship old son. No ones talking about 1. e4, or the first few moves of the game.
You may be a moralist but you sure aint no philosopher.
When one plays 1.e4 what morality exists? shall ones opponent exclaim you cad and bounder that move is immoral? If they did we should call the arbiter and possibly a doctor as well. We may claim that its a 'good' move, but this has no moral connotations, good in the sense that it obeys t ...[text shortened]... rd itself and the original premise is sound, the reasoning excellent and the logic unassailable.
Originally posted by radioactive69I see so you are accusing me of using a chess engine, thats interesting. Was maghoober55 also using a chess engine when I played him, because I did not manage to beat him, so either he's as strong as a chess engine or he was using a chess engine if we are to believe your accusation. Please explain.
No it's more like when YOU get to the middle of the game and YOU consult some chess engine. Now that aint sportsmanship old son. No ones talking about 1. e4, or the first few moves of the game.
Also what about Van Zeal, jimheatherington, Micheal Lenga etc etc were they using a chess engines when they beat me up? They must have been if we are to believe your accusation. Please explain.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAre YOU feeling guilty or something? No one's accusing YOU of cheating.............unless this is some sort of admission? Please explain
I see so you are accusing me of using a chess engine, thats interesting. Was maghoober55 also using a chess engine when i played him, because i did not manage to beat him, so either he's as strong as a chess engine or he was using a chess engine. Please explain.
Originally posted by radioactive69No I am not feeling guilty i simply want you to explain your remarks, here they are again,
Are YOU feeling guilty or something? No one's accusing YOU of cheating.............unless this is some sort of admission? Please explain
YOU get to the middle of the game and YOU consult some chess engine - radioactive69
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWas I referring to YOU in particular.......or has your guilt led YOU to think that?
No I am not feeling guilty i simply want you to explain your remarks, here they are again,
YOU get to the middle of the game and YOU consult some chess engine - radioactive69
Hmmmmmm.............very interesting !!!
29 Mar 16
Originally posted by radioactive69What a complete tool you are.
Was I referring to YOU in particular.......or has your guilt led YOU to think that?
Hmmmmmm.............very interesting !!!
You quoted Robbies post and then made that accusation thus you could only be referring to him.
You deserve a lifetime ban for such outrageous accusations 😛 😛 😛
Originally posted by MctaytoA fool calling someone a tool. That's rich. Thankfully everything that spouts from your cheating lips is ignored by basically everyone on this site, except for the few other cheating malcontents.
What a complete tool you are.
You quoted Robbies post and then made that accusation thus you could only be referring to him.
You deserve a lifetime ban for such outrageous accusations 😛 😛 😛
How you haven't been dealt a lifetime ban for your various nefarious acts in attempting to destroy this site with your jealousy defies logic. I would have booted you for life years ago.
Have a nice day !!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by SilverstrikerIf it wasn't for the few you refer to then there wouldn't be any reason having a clan forum. No one else posts here and if they do it's not worth reading. The extremely few posts referring to anything else clan in nature takes up about ..........half a dozen postings.
same people come back and the forum was the same as before - was there any point in recreating the clan forum?
What do you see as the function of this forum?
- Joined
- 12 Nov 05
- Moves
- 145614
Originally posted by radioactive69the forum would be better served if everyone can follow the same rule of "if you cant take it ,don't dish it out"
If it wasn't for the few you refer to then there wouldn't be any reason having a clan forum. No one else posts here and if they do it's not worth reading. The extremely few posts referring to anything else clan in nature takes up about ..........half a dozen postings.
What do you see as the function of this forum?
Already there are a couple of users who cant seem to take it but enjoy dishing it out....