Debates
30 Oct 21
02 Nov 21
@averagejoe1 saidYou are so dense. This is why it's painful to talk to you, but we keep trying because we can't believe anyone, even a Republican, is this stupid.
Look at Shav,, trying to impress the other liberals here with Clinton speak....who said ‘ it depends on what is is .’
Why can I just not bring myself to say that you have a point? I do it often on the form, but darned if I’m gonna do it in this case. I don’t think you’re fooling anybody .
Hey, kindly tell what the person, who is trespassing, is? And if ...[text shortened]... ys ‘Illegal to walk on beach after 3:00 PM”, what would you call a person if he walks on the beach?
02 Nov 21
@averagejoe1 saidA person.
Look at Shav,, trying to impress the other liberals here with Clinton speak....who said ‘ it depends on what is is .’
Why can I just not bring myself to say that you have a point? I do it often on the form, but darned if I’m gonna do it in this case. I don’t think you’re fooling anybody .
Hey, kindly tell what the person, who is trespassing, is? And if ...[text shortened]... ys ‘Illegal to walk on beach after 3:00 PM”, what would you call a person if he walks on the beach?
@suzianne said{this is response to Suzianne above, saying my posts are painful]
I responded to this. You don't want to respond to that.
See Zahlanzi top of page... I had said “only about 15% qualify’ for asylum”, He responded. ‘they asked for asylum’ Obviously they have to ask, for gosh sakes. Then, true to liberal form, he writes back that I, average Joe, have confused qualify with “ ask for “. I mean, really.... Would any sensible person think I was confusing the two?
The issue here, is about just his first paragraph.
So, when you read what he said, and then what I said, which one of us is “the most painful to talk to?” If we 3 were having beers at the Shot-teria’ , and I said only 15% qualify, to which he responded that they ‘asked for asylum’ 🤔 🤔 , you and I would look at each other, quizzically, and say in unison....”What did he just say?”
I don’t mean to single out Zahlanzi for typical lib-dancing, but his was so handy! ....Here in our thread!
@shavixmir saidOK, I’ll give you this one, but in American vernacular, nomenclature, .....the dictionary..,whatever, they are aliens to us. So, the illegal reference would be superfluous, since they are here illegally, being illegal aliens, which could be an oxymoron, but do I digress !?!?? If the beachcomber is illegally walking on the beach, he is an illegal walker, which for brevity, it is shortened sometimes. You are right, we actually would not call him an ‘illegal’Also, you can imagine the poor citizens of Del Rio being over run, can we give those sad families a pass to call them illegal immigrants (persons) and shorten it to ‘illegals’, which dammit, makes them feel better.
A person.
They traipse through their yards. I can picture their eyes cutting back and forth, surveying possibilities, if you get my drift.
I just get so angry sometimes, Suzianne keeps me tied up in a swivet!
Don’t let me upset you, y’all will win in the end, even if we Win VA tomorrow.
02 Nov 21
@jimm619 saidNo, no, Jimm, read again. It is quite plausible. Maybe you missed the between-the-lines part that he will always have the $450k, the corpus, the nest egg. He just lives on the dividends. Cool.
@AverageJoe1
...........I'll say it again
YA' CAN'T FIX STUPID~!
I was thinking about doing itmyself, but I’d have to do something illegal, violate the law, the Constitution. Rats.
@averagejoe1 saidThey won't invest it though, they'll blow it on bling/booze/drugs/sex and it will be gone in a year.
A factoid: If an alien invests the $450K,, it will return over $30K a year. A 'living wage'!! With only 30K income, he will qualify for all the entitlement programs of the USA. Big money. And he won't have to work.
Just like all the despised rich people who do not work!!! Are you gonna despise him too????
Then they'll want more.
@dood111 saidThankyou. You just exemplified my lectures about CHOICE. They would indeed blow it, it is their choice. But why not?,....like. you say, they are losers and beggars, they will find that MORE, indeed.,
They won't invest it though, they'll blow it on bling/booze/drugs/sex and it will be gone in a year.
Then they'll want more.
@averagejoe1 saidDoes anyone understand this?
{this is response to Suzianne above, saying my posts are painful]
See Zahlanzi top of page... I had said “only about 15% qualify’ for asylum”, He responded. ‘they asked for asylum’ Obviously they have to ask, for gosh sakes. Then, true to liberal form, he writes back that I, average Joe, have confused qualify with “ ask for “. I mean, really.... Would any se ...[text shortened]... mean to single out Zahlanzi for typical lib-dancing, but his was so handy! ....Here in our thread!
@averagejoe1 saidYou all want choice, until you discover that all those "other" people also get a choice. Then you do everything you can to nullify their choice, but not yours.
Thankyou. You just exemplified my lectures about CHOICE. They would indeed blow it, it is their choice. But why not?,....like. you say, they are losers and beggars, they will find that MORE, indeed.,
@dood111 saidDon't be shy, tell us exactly WHO these 'THEY' are?
They won't invest it though, they'll blow it on bling/booze/drugs/sex and it will be gone in a year.
Then they'll want more.
Are they Mexicans? Are they rapists? Are you sure some of them are good people?
03 Nov 21
@suzianne saidAliens. Could be good people or bad, maybe rapists, barbers, carpenters....you see, Suzy, we dont know WHO they are? See how conveniently you pose your questions? Could be anybody, Uhhh, they have come from ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY COUNTRIES....do you think it is just Mexico?
Don't be shy, tell us exactly WHO these 'THEY' are?
Are they Mexicans? Are they rapists? Are you sure some of them are good people?
04 Nov 21
@averagejoe1 saidAt this point, it is utterly pointless to debate, speculate or fantasize about what someone might do with this money.
No, no, Jimm, read again. It is quite plausible. Maybe you missed the between-the-lines part that he will always have the $450k, the corpus, the nest egg. He just lives on the dividends. Cool.
I was thinking about doing itmyself, but I’d have to do something illegal, violate the law, the Constitution. Rats.
The article has already been dismissed as fake news.
04 Nov 21
@mghrn55 saidMG, the administration , the socialists,, the whole crowd would do it if at all possible.
At this point, it is utterly pointless to debate, speculate or fantasize about what someone might do with this money.
The article has already been dismissed as fake news.
Libs, the only thing we owe the immigrants is deportation.