@sonhouse said"Repubs HATE actual policy bills, they ONLY love the idea of gaining yet more power and making laws criminalizing human activity"
Repubs HATE actual policy bills, they ONLY love the idea of gaining yet more power and making laws criminalizing human activity, a judge just denied a trans girl the right to hold graduation ceremonies. What the HELL does a judge have to do with events like that? That is one completely political HACK job, the same with Roe V Wade, judges acting like they know more than medic ...[text shortened]... cnews.com/health/womens-health/idaho-most-extreme-anti-abortion-state-law-restricts-travel-rcna78225
Democrats want to censor anything they disagree with. That is not gaining yet more power? How is censoring global warming skeptics not a power grab? If democrats have such contempt for debates why are they on this forum? To end debates on the debates forum?
@averagejoe1 saidDid you mean "relevant"?
I always put it this way...Libs do not answer questions.
Prove me wrong Sue.
Or, ask me a question, if you still want to be relative on the thread.
Here's your sign.
@metal-brain saidPerhaps you should read my thread about "cancel culture" being a Republican invention.
"Repubs HATE actual policy bills, they ONLY love the idea of gaining yet more power and making laws criminalizing human activity"
Democrats want to censor anything they disagree with. That is not gaining yet more power? How is censoring global warming skeptics not a power grab? If democrats have such contempt for debates why are they on this forum? To end debates on the debates forum?
@wajoma saidGood job on the "self-own".
You're the one that tries to fuse 'bleeps' with the word that rhymes with bigger, but starts with the letter between M and O, that is an anagram of ginger.
You're the one that does that suzi.
I use bleeps because I know what it means, you know what it means and it's safer than the rest of the constantly changing, difficult to keep up with, politically correct terms fo ...[text shortened]... ot do so, please offer an overdue apology and retraction. (A sure fired way to send suzi scurrying.)
@suzianne saidsuzi said:
Stupid says what?
"A far-right-wing libertarian..."
Can she defend it.
Please define what you mean by far-right-wing, then provide some example of myself being far-right. Then when you cannot do so, please offer an overdue apology and retraction. (A sure fired way to send suzi scurrying.)
@metal-brain saidI'm glad you reminded me. Debates. I will do a thread for Sonhouse, he says we do not want a democracy, but I have a serious counter-point for him.
She is not here to debate. She is on the debates forum to stifle debates.
When democrats cannot win a debate they try to censor it. They only like debates they can win.
You have to read it to find out what it is!!!!
@AverageJoe1
You know, speaking of X45, if he is actually elected again, he will go in for 'Retribution', his own words. Go after his enemies using the power of office.
Is that ok with you?
@sonhouse saidI didn't read the post, same old re-hash, still on first base, (by a walk),about abortion, power, blah blah ...i mean....
Repubs HATE actual policy bills
But let me ask you a question, No cussin', no capitals, no emotion, nice and clean, (like when I asked you what your response would be if Trump were the one caught up this money corruption scandal with his family, which you never answered...).
Sonhouse if the 'Policy Bill' put forth an idea to make our southern border, shall we say, porous, increasing the flow by about 600%, would you HATE that, (oops, a capital!) as you suggest we would?
@AverageJoe1
We obviously need help on the border, we can't let fifty million people in which would probably happen if the borders really opened up but I think you are overblowing it a bit, have to admit I have not followed the border situation.
What is my reaction now that Trump HAS already been convicted of THREE separate fraud cases if you don't remember.
First two were the so-called Trump university, which was a money making fraud proven in court and the Trump so-called 'charity' which was also proven to be a fraud and in those he was fined 25 MILLION and now #3 about Stormy, it was not about payments to a hooker it was about the way he tried to have it as a tax write off but of course you knew all that already, right?
Now we have a phone call where Trump admitted he had classified docs and now there are three charges possible coming from good ole Jack.
Don't forget the Georgia charges coming up.
You must really feel frustrated in your continued effort to defend you god king especially since you wrote here Trump is not above the law.
How much corruption will it take before you dump this psychopath?
Do you fully understand the implication of his words, I will do retribution, do you have any idea exactly what that means?
It is a continuation and no doubt expansion on his previous use of government power to attack individual people and naming them on TV which has made their life hell, the police suggested to them they move out to somewhere nobody knows them, and that was just a couple of election workers falsely accused of deliberate voter fraud which was 100% BS but I guess that bothers you not at all, a POTUS using the power of his office to harass and attack random people he thinks are his enemies. Did you see even BUSH jr or sr do that? Or Biden or Obama or even Clinton, none of them attacked individual people and naming them on TV.
But you seem to be ok with that kind of behavior and we are not even on the level of the coming court cases, this is corruption out in the open pure and simple, do you agree at least with that?