04 Oct 10
1 edit
Originally posted by AThousandYoungWilders claims that muslims aren't tolerant enough, and that muslims will not accept anything different than the islam, unlike all other religions.
First of all, the Dutch people will not disappear. Cultures do not get replaced.
That's why Dutch people will suddenly disappear.
04 Oct 10
Originally posted by AThousandYoungPeople of Moroccan descent make up about 2% of the population. Most of them, at least their parents or grandparents, came to Holland in the 60s to do dirty work the Dutch weren't willing to do.
First of all, the Dutch people will not disappear. Cultures do not get replaced.
Second, why are Moroccans flooding into Holland?
Third, European ethnic and political dominance over Europe is NOT going to end over a flood of ghetto Moroccans.
04 Oct 10
Originally posted by KazetNagorraOK. Then he speaks for the Dutch people. Hs is one of your Official Representatives. Right?
No no... MP = member of parliament. Like a Congressman.
Such a person speaking on such an issue is not expressing his freedom of speech; he's expressing, in part, Holland's Official Position On The Matter. Right?
04 Oct 10
Originally posted by ThomasterYeah, well, the Jews, Basques, American Indians, Ainu etc are still around despite some determined efforts to stamp them out.
Wilders claims that muslims aren't tolerant enough, and that muslims will not accept anything different than the islam, unlike all other religions.
That's why Dutch people will suddenly disappear.
04 Oct 10
Originally posted by AThousandYoungNo. A senator saying something wouldn't necessarily represent the stance of the US government. In the same sense something a Dutch MP says does not necessarily reflect the stance of the Dutch government. Holland's Official Position is determined by the executive branch of government (the cabinet).
OK. Then he speaks for the Dutch people. Hs is one of your Official Representatives. Right?
Such a person speaking on such an issue is not expressing his freedom of speech; he's expressing, in part, Holland's Official Position On The Matter. Right?
04 Oct 10
Originally posted by AThousandYoungSad, isn't it. 🙁
OK. Then he speaks for the Dutch people. Hs is one of your Official Representatives. Right?
Such a person speaking on such an issue is not expressing his freedom of speech; he's expressing, in part, Holland's Official Position On The Matter. Right?
04 Oct 10
Originally posted by KazetNagorraThe Senator represents her state's Official Position. Of course there are two of them to balance such things.
No. A senator saying something wouldn't necessarily represent the stance of the US government. In the same sense something a Dutch MP says does not necessarily reflect the stance of the Dutch government. Holland's Official Position is determined by the executive branch of government (the cabinet).
I'm too ignorant of your political structure to understand why exactly this person is being prosucuted I guess.
04 Oct 10
Originally posted by AThousandYoungMPs aren't immune to prosecution. He's being prosecuted because some civilians thought they had a case against him.
The Senator represents her state's Official Position. Of course there are two of them to balance such things.
I'm too ignorant of your political structure to understand why exactly this person is being prosucuted I guess.