Go back
As defeat looms Putin lashes out

As defeat looms Putin lashes out

Debates

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
18 Mar 22

@mchill said
Normally I would I agree, but Putin is a man (like his former Soviet counterparts) who only understands one thing - Domination. If Putin thinks he can push a country around, you can bet he'll do it. If a more powerful country pushes back, he'll back down. Putin underestimated the fighting spirit of the Ukrainian people, as well as the response of the NATO bloc and President Bi ...[text shortened]... com/next/2022/03/17/switchblade-drones-what-are-these-kamikaze-weapons-and-how-can-they-help-ukraine
"I watched the Cuban missile crisis unfold in 1962 when the world stood on the edge of nuclear war. The Soviets backed down, and I think Putin will too."

The Soviets didn't back down, the USA did. The USSR put nukes in Cuba in response to the USA putting nukes in Turkey to get those nukes out of Turkey. It worked. The USA backed down.

You fell for the propaganda back then too. The soviets didn't start the Cuban Missile Crisis, the USA did by putting nukes in Turkey. Russia doesn't want them in Ukraine. That is why Russia cannot allow Ukraine to join NATO.

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
18 Mar 22
1 edit

@metal-brain said
"I watched the Cuban missile crisis unfold in 1962 when the world stood on the edge of nuclear war. The Soviets backed down, and I think Putin will too."

The Soviets didn't back down, the USA did. The USSR put nukes in Cuba in response to the USA putting nukes in Turkey to get those nukes out of Turkey. It worked. The USA backed down.

You fell for the propaganda bac ...[text shortened]... n Turkey. Russia doesn't want them in Ukraine. That is why Russia cannot allow Ukraine to join NATO.
The Soviets didn't back down, the USA did. The USSR put nukes in Cuba in response to the USA putting nukes in Turkey to get those nukes out of Turkey. It worked. The USA backed down.

I watched as the Soviet warships turned tail and headed back to Russia when they came face to face with the American armada little guy. I also watched as the USSR agreed to remove the missile launchers from Cuba. All because President John F Kennedy had the balls to stand up to Russia.

You don't know your ass from ice cream!

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89769
Clock
18 Mar 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mchill said
The Soviets didn't back down, the USA did. The USSR put nukes in Cuba in response to the USA putting nukes in Turkey to get those nukes out of Turkey. It worked. The USA backed down.

I watched as the Soviet warships turned tail and headed back to Russia when they came face to face with the American armada little guy. I also watched as the USSR agreed to remove the missile l ...[text shortened]... ident John F Kennedy had the balls to stand up to Russia.

You don't know your ass from ice cream!
Mhmmmm…
Yeah. Sure. That’s how it went.

The USSR missiles were removed from Cuba and US missiles were removed from Italy and Turkey.

As for US tactics, hardly a shining bloody moment of diplomacy. If it wasn’t for Khrushchev not being a complete psycho, the world would have ended (not to mention the U-boat captain making a notable decision as well).

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
18 Mar 22

@mchill said
The Soviets didn't back down, the USA did. The USSR put nukes in Cuba in response to the USA putting nukes in Turkey to get those nukes out of Turkey. It worked. The USA backed down.

I watched as the Soviet warships turned tail and headed back to Russia when they came face to face with the American armada little guy. I also watched as the USSR agreed to remove the missile l ...[text shortened]... ident John F Kennedy had the balls to stand up to Russia.

You don't know your ass from ice cream!
The USSR put nukes in Cuba in response to the USA putting nukes in Turkey to get those nukes out of Turkey. It worked. The USA backed down.

The USA started the Cuban Missile crisis by putting nukes in Turkey and it ended when the USA backed down and took them out. Stop trying to rewrite history.
The American armada didn't remove nukes from Cuba, the USSR did. That happened because the USSR had the balls to stand up to the USA's aggression.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
18 Mar 22
1 edit

@shavixmir said
Mhmmmm…
Yeah. Sure. That’s how it went.

The USSR missiles were removed from Cuba and US missiles were removed from Italy and Turkey.

As for US tactics, hardly a shining bloody moment of diplomacy. If it wasn’t for Khrushchev not being a complete psycho, the world would have ended (not to mention the U-boat captain making a notable decision as well).
"If it wasn’t for Khrushchev not being a complete psycho, the world would have ended (not to mention the U-boat captain making a notable decision as well)."

Don't be silly. Khrushchev was not a psycho. He wanted the nukes out and he accomplished that. He was smart. The USA started it all by putting nukes in the USSR's back yard (so to speak) so he put them in the USA's back yard. How do you like it?

Smart. That is what Khrushchev was.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
18 Mar 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
"If it wasn’t for Khrushchev not being a complete psycho, the world would have ended (not to mention the U-boat captain making a notable decision as well)."

Don't be silly. Khrushchev was not a psycho. He wanted the nukes out and he accomplished that. He was smart. The USA started it all by putting nukes in the USSR's back yard (so to speak) so he put them in the USA's back yard. How do you like it?

Smart. That is what Khrushchev was.
If you read the post again you might realise that your answer was idiotic.
Putin isn’t Khrushchev and in terms of capability Russia is nothing like the Soviet Union / Muscovite Empire.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
18 Mar 22

@sh76 said
This might feel good in the short term because we can't stand Putin and have fallen in love with the heroic Ukranians (except No1, I guess).

But Putin getting more desperate is also bad news. Unless he's toppled (unlikely), as be gets backed further and further into the corner, his incentive to avoid using chemical, biological and even nuclear weapons diminishes.

When Puti ...[text shortened]... is on the ropes is the best time to offer him a deal that will allow him to back down but save face.
China is going to cushion his swallow dive into reality but it’s a shame he has condemned what could be a European powerhouse into a gangster state western outpost of Beijing.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89769
Clock
18 Mar 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
"If it wasn’t for Khrushchev not being a complete psycho, the world would have ended (not to mention the U-boat captain making a notable decision as well)."

Don't be silly. Khrushchev was not a psycho. He wanted the nukes out and he accomplished that. He was smart. The USA started it all by putting nukes in the USSR's back yard (so to speak) so he put them in the USA's back yard. How do you like it?

Smart. That is what Khrushchev was.
That’s exactly what I wrote, darling.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
18 Mar 22

@shavixmir said
That’s exactly what I wrote, darling.
I quoted you moron. The rest is not what you wrote.
Were you drunk?

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
18 Mar 22
1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
arresting protestors…I know another govt that does that!
Feel free to post like a disingenuous cretin. We are talking about old ladies on street corners with placards saying “No to War” not right wing thugs smashing cops over the head with maga flag poles.
Get back to me when someone shouting about “Brandon” gets 15 yrs jail time.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89769
Clock
18 Mar 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
I quoted you moron. The rest is not what you wrote.
Were you drunk?
You can’t read.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
18 Mar 22

@shavixmir said
You can’t read.
He struggles with English but to be fair it’s better than my Russian.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
18 Mar 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
I quoted you moron. The rest is not what you wrote.
Were you drunk?
You missed the inclusion of the word “not”
As in “ "If it wasn’t for Khrushchev not being a complete psycho”
My bold

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
Clock
18 Mar 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@sh76
Except there is no saving grace for Putin, he will push with whatever weapons are available including nukes.

Like you said, the more desperate he is the more likely he will be to use banned weapons but I think even Putin realizes the danger to humanity nukes represent.

Maybe.
it's not about saving grace it's about doing the pragmatic thing and de-escalating this crapfest.

the entire world minus the fewer by the day Putin's admireres know he bungled this big time. He just needs some deal so he can brag to his followers about "winning".

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
18 Mar 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@zahlanzi said
it's not about saving grace it's about doing the pragmatic thing and de-escalating this crapfest.

the entire world minus the fewer by the day Putin's admireres know he bungled this big time. He just needs some deal so he can brag to his followers about "winning".
I think if he asks for more than the Crimea the breakaway statelets in the east and a signed agreement not to join nato this will drag itself into a bloodletting insurgency. I don’t care about Putins war machine smashing its head off a brick wall for the next ten years but the Ukrainians deserve better

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.