Originally posted by FreakyKBHI did not say health care was a right.
Oh.
You mean it's not fair?
There are two players in the NBA, both shorter than most of the women I ever dated, literally one inch shorter than the average male height in America.
And yet despite being in a sport which is dominated by men who, on average, are eleven inches taller than either of them, they both have found success.
Life, like the NBA ...[text shortened]... less the level of their own commitment thereof.
You won't agree, I am sure, but such is life.
In fifty words or less answer this question: It is morally just that one eight year old with leukemia shouldn't get treatment because their parents only have x income while eight year old B should get treatment because their parents have x+ income because ...............................
An answer "such is life" is plainly insufficient. Life in this case is what the People make it. Life in most of the "advanced" world says both eight year olds get treatment.
Originally posted by no1marauderAgain: what is making the care unaffordable (which, if not repealed, will be the first third of the ACA), if not the out-of-whack medical/insurance industry?
I did not say health care was a right.
In fifty words or less answer this question: It is morally just that one eight year old with leukemia shouldn't get treatment because their parents only have x income while eight year old B should get treatment because their parents have x+ income because ...............................
An answer "such is lif ...[text shortened]... he People make it. Life in most of the "advanced" world says both eight year olds get treatment.
They've poisoned the fields and we're expected to pay for the crap crops?
Originally posted by FreakyKBHThat's less than fifty words but not an answer to the question I asked.
Again: what is making the care unaffordable (which, if not repealed, will be the first third of the ACA), if not the out-of-whack medical/insurance industry?
They've poisoned the fields and we're expected to pay for the crap crops?
Originally posted by no1marauderMore pointedly: why provide health care through the current system since the system is completely broken, corrupt?
That's less than fifty words but not an answer to the question I asked.
Fix the system.
If that doesn't solve the problem, no amount of money we throw at it will.
Don't subsidize sub-par products and services.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHSo once the system is "fixed", would you support providing treatment to said patient regardless of the financial situation of the kid's family?
More pointedly: why provide health care through the current system since the system is completely broken, corrupt?
Fix the system.
If that doesn't solve the problem, no amount of money we throw at it will.
Don't subsidize sub-par products and services.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraGiven Freaky's umm "unorthodox" views, it is possible his criticism of the "system" as regards present day health care is based on the failure of barbers to use sufficient amounts of leeches for bloodletting and/or the relative scarcity of trepanning in US hospitals.
So once the system is "fixed", would you support providing treatment to said patient regardless of the financial situation of the kid's family?
Originally posted by no1marauderLOL. This forum is more fun lately.
Given Freaky's umm "unorthodox" views, it is possible his criticism of the "system" as regards present day health care is based on the failure of barbers to use sufficient amounts of leeches for bloodletting and/or the relative scarcity of trepanning in US hospitals.
Originally posted by no1marauderI guess it would save a lot of money (in terms of cost of treatment) if vaccines were abolished and medicine replaced by homeopathy.
Given Freaky's umm "unorthodox" views, it is possible his criticism of the "system" as regards present day health care is based on the failure of barbers to use sufficient amounts of leeches for bloodletting and/or the relative scarcity of trepanning in US hospitals.