Biden busy, does away with female sports?

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Oh, I see. The Liar-in-Chief of RHP, Duchess64 now accuses EoT of being a sexist.

When the Liar-in-chief and libeler, Duchess64 accused EoT of being a "blatant" racist,
I challenged her to show me ONE example of such blatant racism.

Haven't heard from the Great Lair on that one. And it will be the same here. But here goes...

Say, Duchess64... Can you get an example of EoT being sexist? Don't run off now.

And now y'all know why I call Duchess64 the Liar-in-Chief... because she IS

@dood111 said
First day in office Biden signed executive orders making it mandatory that in our public schools male transsexuals can use female bathrooms and compete against girls in all girl sports and people here support that?

Link please the angel is usually in the details.

@kevcvs57 said
Link please the angel is usually in the details.

Yeah, let's see the text of the EO.

Edit: Nevermind, here it is.



The White House

Briefing Room
Executive Order on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation

January 20, 2021 • Presidential Actions

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Policy. Every person should be treated with respect and dignity and should be able to live without fear, no matter who they are or whom they love. Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room, or school sports. Adults should be able to earn a living and pursue a vocation knowing that they will not be fired, demoted, or mistreated because of whom they go home to or because how they dress does not conform to sex-based stereotypes. People should be able to access healthcare and secure a roof over their heads without being subjected to sex discrimination. All persons should receive equal treatment under the law, no matter their gender identity or sexual orientation.

These principles are reflected in the Constitution, which promises equal protection of the laws. These principles are also enshrined in our Nation’s anti-discrimination laws, among them Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.). In Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), the Supreme Court held that Title VII’s prohibition on discrimination “because of . . . sex” covers discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation. Under Bostock‘s reasoning, laws that prohibit sex discrimination — including Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.), the Fair Housing Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), and section 412 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1522), along with their respective implementing regulations — prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation, so long as the laws do not contain sufficient indications to the contrary.

Discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation manifests differently for different individuals, and it often overlaps with other forms of prohibited discrimination, including discrimination on the basis of race or disability. For example, transgender Black Americans face unconscionably high levels of workplace discrimination, homelessness, and violence, including fatal violence.

It is the policy of my Administration to prevent and combat discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation, and to fully enforce Title VII and other laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation. It is also the policy of my Administration to address overlapping forms of discrimination.

Sec. 2. Enforcing Prohibitions on Sex Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation. (a) The head of each agency shall, as soon as practicable and in consultation with the Attorney General, as appropriate, review all existing orders, regulations, guidance documents, policies, programs, or other agency actions (“agency actions&rdquo😉 that:

(i) were promulgated or are administered by the agency under Title VII or any other statute or regulation that prohibits sex discrimination, including any that relate to the agency’s own compliance with such statutes or regulations; and

(ii) are or may be inconsistent with the policy set forth in section 1 of this order.

(b) The head of each agency shall, as soon as practicable and as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, including the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.), consider whether to revise, suspend, or rescind such agency actions, or promulgate new agency actions, as necessary to fully implement statutes that prohibit sex discrimination and the policy set forth in section 1 of this order.

(c) The head of each agency shall, as soon as practicable, also consider whether there are additional actions that the agency should take to ensure that it is fully implementing the policy set forth in section 1 of this order. If an agency takes an action described in this subsection or subsection (b) of this section, it shall seek to ensure that it is accounting for, and taking appropriate steps to combat, overlapping forms of discrimination, such as discrimination on the basis of race or disability.

(d) Within 100 days of the date of this order, the head of each agency shall develop, in consultation with the Attorney General, as appropriate, a plan to carry out actions that the agency has identified pursuant to subsections (b) and (c) of this section, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law.

Sec. 3. Definition. “Agency” means any authority of the United States that is an “agency” under 44 U.S.C. 3502(1), other than those considered to be independent regulatory agencies, as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5).

Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR.

THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 20, 2021.

@jinxdawson said
I am all for most BLTQ issues, but I am opposed to gay men competing against women in sports.

Good thing that's not what this is about then.

Btw, it's LGBTQ.

@jinxdawson said
@Suzianne - Well little lady any man who has his Johnson whacked off then takes chemicals to grows hooters is as gay as you are going to get. Lot of that in the BLTQ community. Gay stuff. I researched this in great detail from links at Breibert.

Breitbart. Of course.

Why are you so afraid?

@suzianne said
Yeah, let's see the text of the EO.

Edit: Nevermind, here it is.



The White House

Briefing Room
Executive Order on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation

January 20, 2021 • Presidential Actions

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, ...[text shortened]... oyees, or agents, or any other person.

JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR.

THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 20, 2021.

Equal treatment under the law. THAT is what this is about.

Nothing more, nothing less. Is that why you rednecks are against it?

@suzianne said
Breitbart. Of course.

Why are you so afraid?

I’m pretty sure this particular halfwit is a wind up.
No one is this stupid, not even a conservative Republican

The post that was quoted here has been removed

The Republicans think so, given that they are the party of discrimination.

Uh oh, Auto-mod strikes again.

@suzianne said
The Republicans think so, given that they are the party of discrimination.

Well ol' Jinx Dawson ain't one to associate with homo sapiens!

@kevcvs57 said
I’m pretty sure this particular halfwit is a wind up.
No one is this stupid, not even a conservative Republican

Depends on the flavor.

An Eisenhower Republican, or even a Goldwater Republican, hell, even a George W. Bush Republican, no.

A Trump Republican, hell yes.