was lying…meant to fool their base, sonhouse and vivfly fell for it…pitiful fools
Secret Service agents willing to testify that Trump didn't lunge at steering wheel during Capitol riot: source
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/secret-service-agents-testify-trump-lunge-steering-wheel-capitol-riot
@mott-the-hoople saidThe person who made the claim admitted that she got the story second-hand....from someone else who wasn't there either.
was lying…meant to fool their base, sonhouse and vivfly fell for it…pitiful fools
Secret Service agents willing to testify that Trump didn't lunge at steering wheel during Capitol riot: source
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/secret-service-agents-testify-trump-lunge-steering-wheel-capitol-riot
Her statement shouldn't even have been admitted as "evidence."
@jj-adams saidthis is not a serious hearing…dems are putting on a production trying to stay in power, meanwhile the people cant afford groceries or fuel.
The person who made the claim admitted that she got the story second-hand....from someone else who wasn't there either.
Her statement shouldn't even have been admitted as "evidence."
@mott-the-hoople saidPut them on the stand then, don't rely on an "anonymous" source rather than a witness under oath.
was lying…meant to fool their base, sonhouse and vivfly fell for it…pitiful fools
Secret Service agents willing to testify that Trump didn't lunge at steering wheel during Capitol riot: source
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/secret-service-agents-testify-trump-lunge-steering-wheel-capitol-riot
@no1marauder saidA witness who wasn't there and was just passing along some gossip from someone else that wasn't there.
Put them on the stand then, don't rely on an "anonymous" source rather than a witness under oath.
@no1marauder saidSo they can just accept gossip as fact if they want to?
There's no hearsay rule in Committee hearings.
@jj-adams saidThere is no evidence. That is why I don’t care, why we should not care. These horrible Trump haters are spending SO much money. If there were evidence, the faairey Schiff would have presented it.
The person who made the claim admitted that she got the story second-hand....from someone else who wasn't there either.
Her statement shouldn't even have been admitted as "evidence."
We have found someone worse than Sonhouse!!!
@no1marauder saidthere is no make anything up rule either…you lib fools are about at the end of your rope. credibility was lost long ago, even you used to have a half way valid argument. now all you can do is post frivolous quips disparaging polls and links like jimmi
There's no hearsay rule in Committee hearings.
@averagejoe1 saidThe libbies here are always claiming that news stories are unreliable if they don't fit their agenda, but they'll accept as fact any silly claim Democrats come up with, no matter how implausible.
Yes, it seems that Marauder thinks that. Holy Smokes. The forum is entertaining, Marauder can be the funnest to watch squirm on occasion.
@mott-the-hoople saidA faceless, nameless "source close to the Secret Service" is telling Fox that faceless nameless "agents" are willing to testify. This article contains no quotes, no names, and no details. If they're willing to testify, then why are they speaking off the record anonymously through another anonymous source?
was lying…meant to fool their base, sonhouse and vivfly fell for it…pitiful fools
Secret Service agents willing to testify that Trump didn't lunge at steering wheel during Capitol riot: source
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/secret-service-agents-testify-trump-lunge-steering-wheel-capitol-riot
When these agents give sworn testimony, then this is a debate question as to who is committing perjury. Until then, it seems like a stretch.
@mott-the-hoople saidHahahahHha
was lying…meant to fool their base, sonhouse and vivfly fell for it…pitiful fools
Secret Service agents willing to testify that Trump didn't lunge at steering wheel during Capitol riot: source
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/secret-service-agents-testify-trump-lunge-steering-wheel-capitol-riot
@wildgrass saidExactly.
A faceless, nameless "source close to the Secret Service" is telling Fox that faceless nameless "agents" are willing to testify. This article contains no quotes, no names, and no details. If they're willing to testify, then why are they speaking off the record anonymously through another anonymous source?
When these agents give sworn testimony, then this is a debate question as to who is committing perjury. Until then, it seems like a stretch.
And even Barr, Ivanka and God knows how many first hand witnesses have testified to what was going on. It’s clear cut.
@shavixmir saidSo, Shav, it is clear cut. So at the end of all this, pray tell, what will be the final outcome??????
Exactly.
And even Barr, Ivanka and God knows how many first hand witnesses have testified to what was going on. It’s clear cut.
This should be good. You might want to work your answer up with proof-reading by Sonhouse.
Can't wait!!!