Go back
bombshell witness

bombshell witness

Debates

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
29 Jun 22

was lying…meant to fool their base, sonhouse and vivfly fell for it…pitiful fools

Secret Service agents willing to testify that Trump didn't lunge at steering wheel during Capitol riot: source

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/secret-service-agents-testify-trump-lunge-steering-wheel-capitol-riot

JJ Adams

Joined
23 Feb 22
Moves
1798
Clock
29 Jun 22

@mott-the-hoople said
was lying…meant to fool their base, sonhouse and vivfly fell for it…pitiful fools

Secret Service agents willing to testify that Trump didn't lunge at steering wheel during Capitol riot: source

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/secret-service-agents-testify-trump-lunge-steering-wheel-capitol-riot
The person who made the claim admitted that she got the story second-hand....from someone else who wasn't there either.
Her statement shouldn't even have been admitted as "evidence."

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
29 Jun 22

@jj-adams said
The person who made the claim admitted that she got the story second-hand....from someone else who wasn't there either.
Her statement shouldn't even have been admitted as "evidence."
this is not a serious hearing…dems are putting on a production trying to stay in power, meanwhile the people cant afford groceries or fuel.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Jun 22

@mott-the-hoople said
was lying…meant to fool their base, sonhouse and vivfly fell for it…pitiful fools

Secret Service agents willing to testify that Trump didn't lunge at steering wheel during Capitol riot: source

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/secret-service-agents-testify-trump-lunge-steering-wheel-capitol-riot
Put them on the stand then, don't rely on an "anonymous" source rather than a witness under oath.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Jun 22

@jj-adams said
The person who made the claim admitted that she got the story second-hand....from someone else who wasn't there either.
Her statement shouldn't even have been admitted as "evidence."
There's no hearsay rule in Committee hearings.

JJ Adams

Joined
23 Feb 22
Moves
1798
Clock
29 Jun 22

@no1marauder said
Put them on the stand then, don't rely on an "anonymous" source rather than a witness under oath.
A witness who wasn't there and was just passing along some gossip from someone else that wasn't there.

JJ Adams

Joined
23 Feb 22
Moves
1798
Clock
29 Jun 22

@no1marauder said
There's no hearsay rule in Committee hearings.
So they can just accept gossip as fact if they want to?

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54590
Clock
29 Jun 22
1 edit

@jj-adams said
The person who made the claim admitted that she got the story second-hand....from someone else who wasn't there either.
Her statement shouldn't even have been admitted as "evidence."
There is no evidence. That is why I don’t care, why we should not care. These horrible Trump haters are spending SO much money. If there were evidence, the faairey Schiff would have presented it.
We have found someone worse than Sonhouse!!!

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54590
Clock
29 Jun 22

@jj-adams said
So they can just accept gossip as fact if they want to?
Yes, it seems that Marauder thinks that. Holy Smokes. The forum is entertaining, Marauder can be the funnest to watch squirm on occasion.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
29 Jun 22

@no1marauder said
There's no hearsay rule in Committee hearings.
there is no make anything up rule either…you lib fools are about at the end of your rope. credibility was lost long ago, even you used to have a half way valid argument. now all you can do is post frivolous quips disparaging polls and links like jimmi

JJ Adams

Joined
23 Feb 22
Moves
1798
Clock
29 Jun 22
1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
Yes, it seems that Marauder thinks that. Holy Smokes. The forum is entertaining, Marauder can be the funnest to watch squirm on occasion.
The libbies here are always claiming that news stories are unreliable if they don't fit their agenda, but they'll accept as fact any silly claim Democrats come up with, no matter how implausible.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
29 Jun 22

@mott-the-hoople said
was lying…meant to fool their base, sonhouse and vivfly fell for it…pitiful fools

Secret Service agents willing to testify that Trump didn't lunge at steering wheel during Capitol riot: source

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/secret-service-agents-testify-trump-lunge-steering-wheel-capitol-riot
A faceless, nameless "source close to the Secret Service" is telling Fox that faceless nameless "agents" are willing to testify. This article contains no quotes, no names, and no details. If they're willing to testify, then why are they speaking off the record anonymously through another anonymous source?

When these agents give sworn testimony, then this is a debate question as to who is committing perjury. Until then, it seems like a stretch.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89784
Clock
29 Jun 22

@mott-the-hoople said
was lying…meant to fool their base, sonhouse and vivfly fell for it…pitiful fools

Secret Service agents willing to testify that Trump didn't lunge at steering wheel during Capitol riot: source

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/secret-service-agents-testify-trump-lunge-steering-wheel-capitol-riot
HahahahHha

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89784
Clock
29 Jun 22

@wildgrass said
A faceless, nameless "source close to the Secret Service" is telling Fox that faceless nameless "agents" are willing to testify. This article contains no quotes, no names, and no details. If they're willing to testify, then why are they speaking off the record anonymously through another anonymous source?

When these agents give sworn testimony, then this is a debate question as to who is committing perjury. Until then, it seems like a stretch.
Exactly.

And even Barr, Ivanka and God knows how many first hand witnesses have testified to what was going on. It’s clear cut.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54590
Clock
29 Jun 22

@shavixmir said
Exactly.

And even Barr, Ivanka and God knows how many first hand witnesses have testified to what was going on. It’s clear cut.
So, Shav, it is clear cut. So at the end of all this, pray tell, what will be the final outcome??????
This should be good. You might want to work your answer up with proof-reading by Sonhouse.
Can't wait!!!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.