The post that was quoted here has been removedI'm not afraid of homosexuality, I am actively opposed to it. And besides, I'm not limiting or discriminating against homosexuals in this thread, I'm proposing that we protect marriage between one man and one woman and strengthen it since it's the bedrock of our society and civilization for the past 2,000+ years. Indeed, you should think of the children, since they're our future. When everyone has the right to do whatever they want, whenever they want with whomever they want, what kind of world will that be? You tolerance for anything, anytime, anywhere is appalling and you should think more about the society at large, which I will remind you that you're a part of. So stand up straight (pun intended, in case you didn't get it) and fly right.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterHow do you propose we strengthen marriage? I'm all ears.
I'm not afraid of homosexuality, I am actively opposed to it. And besides, I'm not limiting or discriminating against homosexuals in this thread, I'm proposing that we protect marriage between one man and one woman and strengthen it since it's the bedrock of our society and civilization for the past 2,000+ years. Indeed, you should think of the c ...[text shortened]... a part of. So stand up straight (pun intended, in case you didn't get it) and fly right.
The post that was quoted here has been removedJust because I really dislike you, I'm going to answer all your questions…then maybe you will understand that I'm serious and will never back down from heathens like you or the ones in government who support this kind of nonsense:
• DSR: I'm not afraid of homosexuality, I am actively opposed to it.
CFT: Why are you actively opposed to it?
DSR: As a Christian, my beliefs are resolute. The Bible states in Leviticus 18:22, "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."
• DSR: I'm not limiting or discriminating against homosexuals in this thread...
CFT: And yet you go on immediately to say: "I'm proposing that we protect marriage between one man and one woman..." So you would limit a citizen's choice to make a legally binding habitation/inheritance contract to only a person of the opposite sex? That sounds very much like you're discriminating against and limiting choice for those who prefer to formally, and legally, co-habit with someone of the same sex.
DSR: That's one way of looking at it; another is that homosexuals are not denied any rights all since they are also free to marry any single man (provided they are a woman) or single woman (provided they are a man) who will have them. Also, by seeking to redefine marriage, the term will lose any meaning at all because any combination of individuals or groups could then be considered married. For instance, one man and a woman, one woman and a woman, two men and two men, three women and one man, two brothers, three sisters and six men, etc. Polygamists, pedophiles and people who engage in beastiality are watching the progress of gay "marriage" very closely and are just as eager to declare their own "independence day."
• DSR: I'm proposing that we protect marriage between one man and one woman and strengthen it since it's the bedrock of our society and civilization for the past 2,000+ years.
CFT: Yet, society has changed enormously. In the West, women are no longer solely possessions of men for baby-making and house-keeping. Child mortality rates and education standards have improved dramatically. Your romantic view of the institution of marriage, which evolved around those two key facts - possession of women for the production and care of children, and the education of children - is as outdated as the idea of the institution itself.
DSR: If you haven't looked up lately, you'll notice that Europe is dying off because you're not producing enough replacements. This is partly due to the fact that you Europeans have a cultural of narcissism – you're more concerned with gratifying your own egos, satisfying every whim and exercising all your "rights" instead of embracing your responsibilities like having and rearing children. Is it any wonder then that Europe is being Islamicized?
• DSR: Your tolerance for anything, anytime, anywhere is appalling and you should think more about the society at large, which I will remind you that you're a part of. So stand up straight (pun intended, in case you didn't get it) and fly right.
CFT: I have no tolerance for bigots like yourself who deign to tell people what is best for them, based on vague, prejudiced notions of right and wrong. Society 'at large' is a diverse, ever-changing thing. This isn't about giving "everyone...the right to do whatever they want, whenever they want with whomever they want", it's about a legal contract between two consenting, mature citizens. Who gives YOU the right to take away that equality under the eyes of the law? God? Your own notions of right and wrong, based upon naive prejudices of a non-existent halcyon society?
DSR: Evidently you have no tolerance for religious people either. While it is true that our interactions with members of other cultures has increased significantly over the past 50 years, the things that brought us this far are still relevant today, including the wisdom contained in the Bible and a clearly defined notion of marriage (i.e., one man and one woman). Although you may want to enter into a brave new world of polymorphous perversity, I and others do not.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterDSR: As a Christian, my beliefs are resolute. The Bible states in Leviticus 18:22, "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."
DSR: As a Christian, my beliefs are resolute. The Bible states in Leviticus 18:22, "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."
DSR: That's one way of looking at it; another is that homosexuals are not denied any rights all since they are also free to marry any single man (provided they are a woman) or s and rearing children. Is it any wonder then that Europe is being Islamicized?
This says nothing about lesbians. Can womankind lie with womankind then?
DSR: Polygamists, pedophiles and people who engage in beastiality are watching the progress of gay "marriage" very closely and are just as eager to declare their own "independence day."
Horse S... Those things are against the LAW. Being gay isn't against the LAW you idiot.
DSR: If you haven't looked up lately, you'll notice that Europe is dying off because you're not producing enough replacements. This is partly due to the fact that you Europeans have a cultural of narcissism – you're more concerned with gratifying your own egos, satisfying every whim and exercising all your "rights" instead of embracing your responsibilities like having and rearing children. Is it any wonder then that Europe is being Islamicized?
More garbage. Virtually every species on earth eventually finds an equilibrium with its environment. Humans for centuries have not found this balance. In western societies we have finally reached a point where we are not producing as many offspring as we used to. It is the first step that we are on that will reduce our resource consumption and bring us into equilibrium. Non-western societies are still producing offspring at rates similar to what western rates USED to be. But this has nothing to do with responsibilities to produce offspring at the same rate we used to.
The christian, "GO FORTH AND MULITPLY" mantra was not an edict from God ffs, it was just a way to ensure an increase in the number of Christians around the world.
So please, shove your bible pumping vitrole up your ass, get your head out of your dark ages closet and see society for what it is.
Why I have to explain this stuff to people is a sad sad sad statement about the stupidity and sheer ignorance of the people in our society.