Debates
12 Dec 23
@mott-the-hoople said"If the security of the population" or imperative military reasons so demand.
why did you only post PART of article 49 of the fourth geveva convention?
Here it is in its entirety'''
Nevertheless, the Occupying Power may undertake total or
partial evacuation of a given area if the security of the population or
imperative military reasons so demand.
Israel isn't evicting Palestinians for their security
And palestinians are not a state...none of the conventions apply to them
So war crimes don't apply if they're committed against Taiwan? Or Guam?
What an unintelligent comment.
14 Dec 23
@vivify saidIsrael has advised palestinians to leave the areas in advance...dont lie.
"If the security of the population" or imperative military reasons so demand.
Israel isn't evicting Palestinians for their security
And palestinians are not a state...none of the conventions apply to them
So war crimes don't apply if they're committed against Taiwan? Or Guam?
What an unintelligent comment.
Guam was ceded to the US so yes they are protected. Taiwan is up in the air, even they are unsure...
"
Protected Persons -- any individuals legally able to invoke the Laws of War for their protection, which in general includes two main groups:
"enemy nationals" within the national territory of each of the parties to the conflict and
"the whole population" of occupied territories (excluding nationals of the occupying power), but more specifically also includes stateless persons, refugees, POWs, criminal detainees, non-repatriated persons, neutral aliens, nationals of Allied Powers without diplomatic relations, etc.
Normally, a protected person must be a national of a signatory country in order to invoke the GC protections but extensions can be provided through relationships with co-belligerents (aka "allies"😉.
Application to Taiwan
In terms of legal authority which can be cited to justify the U.S. Dept. of State's authorization for the TCG to issue ID cards (and, in the future, passports) to native Taiwanese people, the TCG believes that there are some very sound arguments based on military jurisdiction under the U.S. Constitution. (See the EBOOK, Chapter 11.)
Moreover, in Taiwan, USMG is the protecting power. Hence, the legal authority for the issuance of Taiwan ID cards and passports can also be based on Article 4 of the Geneva Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Aug. 12, 1949), which defines "protected persons." This is explained above. "
https://www.civil-taiwan.org/protected-ps.htm
You are in over your head, your ignorance is showing.
15 Dec 23
@mott-the-hoople saidYou suggesting that anyone is in over there head on any subject is like Dr. Doofenschmirtz pointing out the flaws in the enigma code breaking machine to Alan Turing.
Israel has advised palestinians to leave the areas in advance...dont lie.
Guam was ceded to the US so yes they are protected. Taiwan is up in the air, even they are unsure...
"
Protected Persons -- any individuals legally able to invoke the Laws of War for their protection, which in general includes two main groups:
"enemy nationals" within the national ...[text shortened]... tps://www.civil-taiwan.org/protected-ps.htm
You are in over your head, your ignorance is showing.
@shavixmir saidwhat? no koalas masturbating with my grandmother?
You suggesting that anyone is in over there head on any subject is like Dr. Doofenschmirtz pointing out the flaws in the enigma code breaking machine to Alan Turing.
365d
@mott-the-hoople saidHe is a multiple-personality schizophrenic
what? no koalas masturbating with my grandmother?
364d
@AverageJoe1
I must confess you don't know SHYTE about what you are talking about. I and my family LIVED in Jerusalem for several years and had friends on both sides the tweed.
@sonhouse saidno one on this thread knows what you are talking about
@AverageJoe1
I must confess you don't know SHYTE about what you are talking about. I and my family LIVED in Jerusalem for several years and had friends on both sides the tweed.
learn to use the quote feature and you want appear so backwards
363d
@Mott-The-Hoople
Yeah, it is obvious there needs to be SOME kind of brain activity to suss out what I said. You with your poor excuse of an education would not know what I meant by 'both sides the tweed'. Try THINKING for yourself sometime rather than relying on Trump to do your thinking for you.
363d
@sonhouse saidWhat post is Sonhouse responding to? I figure he is possibly talking to himself.
@Mott-The-Hoople
Yeah, it is obvious there needs to be SOME kind of brain activity to suss out what I said. You with your poor excuse of an education would not know what I meant by 'both sides the tweed'. Try THINKING for yourself sometime rather than relying on Trump to do your thinking for you.
@Mott-The-Hoople
Now THAT is hilarious, Mott saying Vivify is in over his head. Talk about the kettle calling the pot black......
@sonhouse saidYou could be mis-gendering. better to use his/hers.
@Mott-The-Hoople
Now THAT is hilarious, Mott saying Vivify is in over his head. Talk about the kettle calling the pot black......