Originally posted by belgianfreakJust ban him.
Sambo69,
I've not hurried to answer your questions as I am reluctant to be beholden to someone on a subject that has a long history who has either:
1)been at the for under a month, so is unaware of that history
2)has been at the site a lot longer than his current user ID suggests, and is therefore hiding his previous ID for a reason
Instead o ...[text shortened]...
Thanks to all those who posted supportively on my behalf.
Regards
BF
Originally posted by NargagunaSo, because the community wants to ostracize a member means that BF should ban him?
Just ban him.
That's a stupid idea.
How about this amazing idea that I did not come up with: ignore him if you don't like him
Saying "Just ban him" adds nothing to the conversation and is nothing but an inflammatory and immature remark.
Originally posted by DraxusPeople are claiming that I spam and pushing to have me banned.
So, because the community wants to ostracize a member means that BF should ban him?
That's a stupid idea.
How about this amazing idea that I did not come up with: ignore him if you don't like him
Saying "Just ban him" adds nothing to the conversation and is nothing but an inflammatory and immature remark.
I haven't spammed.
I also didn't see STANG spamming after his ban was lifted, only to be banned again.
It appears that your arguement is so weak that you need to have someone else (a so called "moderator"😉 remove your opposition.
The conclusion is that there is no arguement supporting the deaths of innocent people.
Originally posted by Sambo69No one I know seriously supports the intentional killing of innocent people, Sambo. Do you think your mission in life is to convince us not to support the intentional killing of innocent people?
People are claiming that I spam and pushing to have me banned.
I haven't spammed.
I also didn't see STANG spamming after his ban was lifted, only to be banned again.
It appears that your arguement is so weak that you need to have someone else (a so called "moderator"😉 remove your opposition.
The conclusion is that there is no arguement supporting the deaths of innocent people.
Originally posted by DelmerMaybe not you personally, though I would encourage you to object rather than simply not support.
No one I know seriously supports the intentional killing of innocent people, Sambo. Do you think your mission in life is to convince us not to support the intentional killing of innocent people?
Originally posted by Sambo69I think it is ridiculous when people use baseless accusations to try and win an argument. That is especially true while I am defending your right to post and not arguing against you.
It appears that your arguement is so weak that you need to have someone else (a so called "moderator"😉 remove your opposition.
For that, you are an idiot.
I still don't think you should be banned because of it though.