19 Jul 20
@philokalia saidLMAO! False whataboutisms don't change the fact that Trump is in blatant violation of Constitutional provisions. The "standard" he should be held to was written into the Supreme Law of the Land more than 230 years ago. He should not get an exemption just because right wing nationalists like yourself approve of his policies aimed at keeping the US as white as possible.
I understand how the emoluments clause works: the Clintons can solicit massive donations to their foundation while in the White House but Pres. Trump is held to a standard that exceeds anything previously existed.
It is on similar, spurious grounds that Pres. Trump is said to have done things warranting impeachment.
19 Jul 20
@no1marauder saidFalse whataboutisms don't change the fact that Trump is in blatant violation of Constitutional provisions. The "standard" he should be held to was written into the Supreme Law of the Land more than 230 years ago.
LMAO! False whataboutisms don't change the fact that Trump is in blatant violation of Constitutional provisions. The "standard" he should be held to was written into the Supreme Law of the Land more than 230 years ago. He should not get an exemption just because right wing nationalists like yourself approve of his policies aimed at keeping the US as white as possible.
And what's been done about it, besides probes, hearings, testimony and media coverage? Nothing! Our Constitution is little more than words written on a page.
19 Jul 20
@Philokalia
It just goes to show how low the average IQ is of Americans. Pretty sad when Trump uses gestapo tactics to stop peaceful protesters using 'cops' with no ID's and whisking away the victims in unmarked vehicles.
How anyone can support this would be dictator is beyond me.
His base takes weakness for strength, waffling as deal making.
THAT is the sad thing in America today.