Go back
DC Bill bans firing staff won fail weed tests.

DC Bill bans firing staff won fail weed tests.

Debates

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
09 Jun 22

@averagejoe1 said
Meant 'who' fail weed tests. If I were an employer, I think I have a right to fire staff who have weed evidence of any nature. The arguments about this will probably be along the lines of the baker who would not bake a gay wedding cake. It is my enterprise, I built it, and here again your govt wants to tell me how to run it.
That's odd....
You have told us, many times,
that YOU ARE AN EMPLOYER.
When we choose to prevaricate,
we should have a good memory. 😛

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
09 Jun 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
Meant 'who' fail weed tests. If I were an employer, I think I have a right to fire staff who have weed evidence of any nature. The arguments about this will probably be along the lines of the baker who would not bake a gay wedding cake. It is my enterprise, I built it, and here again your govt wants to tell me how to run it.
Weed is legal in DC. So why should anyone get fired for it?

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
09 Jun 22

@techsouth said
Would a private employer have the right to fire someone for using the "N-word" on social media?
Yes, discriminatory, racist conduct...I believe so.
If the employer didn't fire the offending employee,
he would be opening himself up to a lawsuit.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26753
Clock
09 Jun 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@vivify said
Weed is legal in DC. So why should anyone get fired for it?
It's illegal by Federal law.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
09 Jun 22

@vivify said
Weed is legal in DC. So why should anyone get fired for it?
That's how I see it, too.
Seems as these people are
really, 'on board,' with small government.
Tell me, 'small govt. spokespeople,'
am I allowed to drink a beer when I get off work?

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
09 Jun 22

@athousandyoung said
It's illegal by Federal law.
Didn't mention FED EMPLOYEES, just went on
about baking a cake, or some such idiocy.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54546
Clock
09 Jun 22

@jimm619 said
That's odd....
You have told us, many times,
that YOU ARE AN EMPLOYER.
When we choose to prevaricate,
we should have a good memory. 😛
?

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54546
Clock
09 Jun 22

@vivify said
Weed is legal in DC. So why should anyone get fired for it?
Because the employer has a right to decide who works for him. Nose rings and tongue rings are crap, so he should not have to look at that crap all day. Is it a violation of constitutional rights of the employee to fire them? Tell us. Of course, nose rings are legal, but not protected by the constitution as is race, color sex religion you get my drift. Maybe you should rephrase, I think as usual that you are not getting the premise of that which I have presented? Whew.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54546
Clock
09 Jun 22

All of you are not going to prevail with my simple point. I can fire a guy who smells like coconut if I dont like coconut. Lets move on to the the 6th!!!! I think it is on tonight according to my Uber driver. He and I are not thinking about watching this crap. I am going to stream Secrets of the Dimbbsrton on HBO!

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
09 Jun 22

@averagejoe1 said
Because the employer has a right to decide who works for him. Nose rings and tongue rings are crap, so he should not have to look at that crap all day. Is it a violation of constitutional rights of the employee to fire them? Tell us. Of course, nose rings are legal, but not protected by the constitution as is race, color sex religion you get my drift. Maybe you shoul ...[text shortened]... hrase, I think as usual that you are not getting the premise of that which I have presented? Whew.
What do nose rings have to do with smoking weed?
I'm assuming, of course, that the weed smoker would be off duty.
You're correct, NO ONE GETS THE PREMISE YOU HAVE PRESENTED.
........WHEW........is right

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
10 Jun 22

@averagejoe1 said
?
Here you go, Jo.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prevaricate

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
10 Jun 22
1 edit

@AverageJoe1
There was an employee at a Jewish restaurant, where they are not allowed to push buttons on shabot. So this one shabot day, hotter then hell, he goes, SCREW IT and turns on the air conditioner.
He got fired because of the rules established by that restaurant.
And lost in court, who sided with the restaurant, they can make their own rules.
Now the same thing goes with grass.
I myself used medical marijuana for a while from a very sore shoulder, and it helped the pain and the pain went away and I stopped smoking even though it was legal for me here in Pennsylvania.

Recently applied for a job as a repair technician, I have a lot of skills in that area, but failed the drug test and they dropped me like a hot rock, ZERO tolerance is what they said, no matter I had not smoked in three months but still positive.

I can bitch and moan about that decision but they have the absolute right to set standards of employment, whether I liked it or not, I have to live with it and like the Jewish restaurant case they set their own standards and could do the same with impunity in Colorado where it is fully legal.
And BTW, now after near four months I got another job offer, took the same test and passed and now looks like I will be working full time again.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54546
Clock
10 Jun 22

@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
There was an employee at a Jewish restaurant, where they are not allowed to push buttons on shabot. So this one shabot day, hotter then hell, he goes, SCREW IT and turns on the air conditioner.
He got fired because of the rules established by that restaurant.
And lost in court, who sided with the restaurant, they can make their own rules.
Now the same thing ...[text shortened]... other job offer, took the same test and passed and now looks like I will be working full time again.
Sonhouse and I slowly see eye to eye. A very honest response to my issue. I think that many folks here have a knee-jerk reaction to anything that doesn't feel right or isn't 'fair'. But a bit of thinking is usually the best cure for off-the-wall unfounded narratives. Thanks for the highlights, Sonhouse.

t

Garner, NC

Joined
04 Nov 05
Moves
31225
Clock
10 Jun 22

@jimm619 said
Yes, discriminatory, racist conduct...I believe so.
If the employer didn't fire the offending employee,
he would be opening himself up to a lawsuit.
Okay, what if the employee stated publicly that a man cannot become a woman in spite of any surgery he may get?

That, too, could lead to lawsuits. Is it okay to fire someone who says that?

On the other hand, what about a surgeon who smoke marijuana on his break when he is at work only for administrative duties?

Is there any room in America for employers who make decisions different than what you approve of?

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
10 Jun 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@jj-adams said
The new Biden admin wanted to fire anyone that admitted to smoking weed, wonder if that would also apply to Barry Obama if he wanted to work there?
LINK?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.