- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
03 Jul 22
Refusing to enforce the law should result in removal from office.
But lets get on with the j6 show right?
Maryland, Virginia govs respond to letter from Supreme Court marshal calling on them to protect justices
https://www.foxnews.com/us/maryland-virginia-respond-supreme-court-letter
Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at http://www.foxnews.com/apps-products/index.html.
midterms hurry up while will still have a country
@mott-the-hoople saidThe law is unconstitutional and shouldn't be enforced. IF the letter of the law was followed, every single demonstrator outside the SCOTUS building (including the yearly Right to Life ones) should have been arrested.
Refusing to enforce the law should result in removal from office.
But lets get on with the j6 show right?
Maryland, Virginia govs respond to letter from Supreme Court marshal calling on them to protect justices
https://www.foxnews.com/us/maryland-virginia-respond-supreme-court-letter
Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at http://www.foxnews.com/apps-products/index.html.
midterms hurry up while will still have a country
03 Jul 22
@earl-of-trumps saidWhat is LBGTQ? What does flying such a flag mean? Should It be something of concern to me?
I bet if the justices flew the LBGTQ flag in front of their house, they'd get the United States Marines to protect them
😳 😳 😳
03 Jul 22
@no1marauder saidTell us what should be done about the protestors at homes of the justices.
The law is unconstitutional and shouldn't be enforced. IF the letter of the law was followed, every single demonstrator outside the SCOTUS building (including the yearly Right to Life ones) should have been arrested.
03 Jul 22
@averagejoe1 saidNothing:
Tell us what should be done about the protestors at homes of the justices.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
As long as they are obeying reasonable noise and other neutral regulations, they should be allowed to exercise their Rights.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
03 Jul 22
@no1marauder saidForming an angry mob outside someone's home and putting them in fear doesn't fall under peaceful assembly.
Nothing:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
As long as they are obeying reasonable noise and other neutral regulations, they should be allowed to exercise their Rights.
03 Jul 22
@jj-adams saidI would think just city ordinances would prohibit such activity. But I for one I’m not going to research it day in and day out like marauder does. Marauder, do you ever play golf?
Forming an angry mob outside someone's home and putting them in fear doesn't fall under peaceful assembly.
03 Jul 22
@AverageJoe1
Do YOU ever get serious? Do you really give a rats ass if we actually lose our democracy?
03 Jul 22
@no1marauder said“State Force”? STATE force??? You speak quite creepily Marx like. Lenin like, if you will. The State! Creepy.
I imagine you think any group protesting against right wing policies is an "angry mob" and should be disrupted with State force.
Tell us, has any politician , or judge, or reporter, president, senator, congressman et al ever used that phrase int the USA?
Are you a person of the USA?
03 Jul 22
@sonhouse saidMarauder, in liberal-exe, cherry picks facts, ignored desth threat on Kavanaugh , guy was arrested. He will say where is the evidence while the evidence is laying on a table. “Why, that is no more believable than Hunter’s laptop.!!!!”
@JJ-Adams
Kinda like this?:
https://www.kalw.org/show/your-call/2022-06-22/election-officials-describe-death-threats-mob-violence
When everyone reads marauder’s prose on the forum, he makes it real flowerdy so that you will overlook very basic facts.
That’s why you have AvJoe! 🎓
03 Jul 22
@sonhouse saidI respect your question, and impressed that you care about democracy. Our problem is that we have different definitions of democracy. I have asked you your def , and you write 12 paragraphs throwing in the name of Trump. If it has the name of Trump in it, I really cannot get beyond that and thus never get to your definition. What is it, anyway.
@AverageJoe1
Do YOU ever get serious? Do you really give a rats ass if we actually lose our democracy?