Go back
democrats have become lawless

democrats have become lawless

Debates

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89770
Clock
04 Jul 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
a man trying to kill a scotus justice at his home is “peaceful”. you are an idiot in the worst degree
Oh, he tried to kill him now.

Anything, and I mean ANYTHING, to deflect from your insurrectionist bastards, trump and his cronies and the attempted coup.

Seriously. Your tongue is so far up trump's arse, you're nothing but a rimming and sucking cult member.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
04 Jul 22
1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
a man trying to kill a scotus justice at his home is “peaceful”. you are an idiot in the worst degree
Seriously, GFY.

That individual was arrested. No one claimed he shouldn't have been. And he was not participating in any demonstration but lurking outside the Justice's home at 1 AM. https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-brett-kavanaugh-district-of-columbia-maryland-government-and-politics-179d18e7f933b3decbaddb542ceb0b29

But what you right wing nuts want is mass arrests of people who have done nothing but what the First Amendment explicitly protects.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147482
Clock
04 Jul 22

@no1marauder said
Seriously, GFY.

That individual was arrested. No one claimed he shouldn't have been. And he was not participating in any demonstration but lurking outside the Justice's home at 1 AM. https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-brett-kavanaugh-district-of-columbia-maryland-government-and-politics-179d18e7f933b3decbaddb542ceb0b29

But what you right wing nuts want is mass arrests of people who have done nothing but what the First Amendment explicitly protects.
LOL the thinking of a liberal.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147482
Clock
04 Jul 22

@shavixmir said
Oh, he tried to kill him now.

Anything, and I mean ANYTHING, to deflect from your insurrectionist bastards, trump and his cronies and the attempted coup.

Seriously. Your tongue is so far up trump's arse, you're nothing but a rimming and sucking cult member.
people protesting an election is “insurrectionist”
people trying to kill a scotus justice is ok

gotcha

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
04 Jul 22
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Mott-The-Hoople
144 capitol cops injured and some dead is not a peaceful protest you POS.
It in ABSOLUTE fact was it was an insurrection. AND the head of the snake was Trump which has been shown without a shadow of a doubt.
But it doesn't matter WHAT criminal behavior Trump has done, like his TWO frauds already fining him 25 MILLION dollars, but none of that matters to you since you are one of his zombies. It is clear Trumpism is your RELIGION which is shown by the fact that religious people are trained to push back at any suggestion there is something wrong with that religion, EXACTLY how you are acting out.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54567
Clock
04 Jul 22

@mott-the-hoople said
LOL the thinking of a liberal.
Mott is killing you, Marauder. Just yesterday he was saying how you 'pick and choose' laws, and here in true form, you define this situation as follows: The attempted murder of Kavanaugh was carried out by a person who, according to you, was not within the confines of the assault on the neighborhood of Kavanaugh. You, in your self appointed esteemed position on the Forum, have decreed that the boundaries and the mission and focus of the assault, by all the losers on the street, was outside of the despicable operation of the felon trying to kill a SCOTUS Judge.
Pitiful. You try to distance the actions of the killer from the street losers, when, in fact, he is trying to kill a man inside the house that they are walking all over.
Throw in the towel, , and get some sun.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54567
Clock
04 Jul 22
1 edit

Liberals simply have it in their ravenous blood to defend the indefensible.
While I have you, Marauder, do y'all still have an active situation at Mr and Mrs Kavanaugh's home?

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
04 Jul 22

@averagejoe1 said
I would think just city ordinances would prohibit such activity. But I for one I’m not going to research it day in and day out like marauder does. Marauder, do you ever play golf?
Probably doesn't play,
any other idiotic games either.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
04 Jul 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
LOL the thinking of a liberal.
Yeah, after all, it was just like tourists seeing the sights.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
04 Jul 22

@mott-the-hoople said
people protesting an election is “insurrectionist”
people trying to kill a scotus justice is ok

gotcha
In only one of your scenarios was anyone actually killed.
Am I right or wrong, BIGMOUTH?'
..............GOTCHA'

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147482
Clock
04 Jul 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@jimm619 said
In only one of your scenarios was anyone actually killed.
Am I right or wrong, BIGMOUTH?'
..............GOTCHA'
yes, the cops shot and killed an UNARMED woman, she was white tho, no marches planned as of yet

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
04 Jul 22

@averagejoe1 said
Mott is killing you, Marauder. Just yesterday he was saying how you 'pick and choose' laws, and here in true form, you define this situation as follows: The attempted murder of Kavanaugh was carried out by a person who, according to you, was not within the confines of the assault on the neighborhood of Kavanaugh. You, in your self appointed esteemed position on the For ...[text shortened]... a man inside the house that they are walking all over.
Throw in the towel, , and get some sun.
I'm sorry that I deal with facts rather than the lurid lies you get fed on right wing media.

The facts are the person who was arrested for attempted murder of Kavanaugh wasn't involved in any of the peaceful protests outside his home. He came alone at 1 AM and was quickly arrested as he should have been.

How that one individual's actions is a sufficient excuse to deny the People rights enshrined in the First Amendment is hard to fathom to rational minds.

And neither you nor Mott will address the fact that the law as written means that police should break up any demonstration at the SCOTUS building itself. I can guess how both of you would have been told to respond if this law was enforced against the March for Life.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.