Dems Turn On Democracy

@no1marauder said
It was fine with you in 2020, wasn't it?

Trump is disqualified from the office of President.

But aside from that, I really don't care how political parties pick their candidates. In NY, we have requirements to get on the ballot more strenuous than Massachusetts and our primaries are "closed" i.e. only members of the party can vote in them. I suppose you think that's not "democracy" either.

@no1marauder
I asked you a question. I did not ask myself a question. Why are you evading the question?
What doesn't make sense? Be specific. I am not a mind reader.

@metal-brain said
I was fine with what?

So you are fine with Trump being the only candidate on the primary ballot if the GOP decides that is fair. Good to know if it happens you will never complain about it.
So Iran banning candidates from running is fair game to you. That is also good to know you accept rules that are anti democratic.

@metal-brain said
@no1marauder
Perhaps you should stop using CNN as a source for anything. They lie too much.

@metal-brain said
@no1marauder
I asked you a question. I did not ask myself a question. Why are you evading the question?
What doesn't make sense? Be specific. I am not a mind reader.

@no1marauder said
Iran banned candidates and parties from running in the general election, generally on ideological and/or religious grounds.

That's a far cry from a political party not letting every Tom, Dick and Sally on a primary ballot.

@no1marauder said
No, it doesn't make sense except to an idiot.

Laws restricting Natural Rights are void and have no validity.

Party rules regarding how they decide on which candidates they run are their business (assuming that person meets legal qualifications), not the States.

That you can't comprehend the difference is rather mind-blowing.

@no1marauder said
Yes. It's an unnecessary regulation of political parties' decision making.

Would that apply to every political party? Would the State be required to have primaries for every single one of them? With as many people on the ballot as the State deemed desirable?

@metal-brain said
What doesn't make sense? I have no idea what you are talking about.
Be specific.

@metal-brain said
I disagree.

Are you suggesting that ballot access has nothing to do with having a chance to win an election? Yes or no?

You did not answer my question. STOP LYING!

@metal-brain said
So if the GOP makes sure only Trump appears on the ballot in every state that is fine with you? Is that what you are saying?

@no1marauder said
Then I'm sorry you're so stupid, but I've explained it in language even an average 5th Grader would understand.

@no1marauder said
I answered this on the last page; how many times do I have to do so?

@metal-brain said
So you are fine with it? I don't believe you.
If the GOP banned everyone from being on the ballot except Trump you would be furious and allege election meddling and you know it. So does everyone else on this forum and you know it. Liar liar pants on fire.

@metal-brain said
STOP LYING!
You are evading my question and it is obvious. I detect a serious weakness so I will ask the same question over and over again until you stop lying and answer my question.