Go back
Did They Lie?

Did They Lie?

Debates

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
05 May 22

@jimm619 said
''WE WILL RESPECT PRECEDENT....IT'S SETTLED LAW.''
https://news.yahoo.com/polling-on-abortion-helps-explain-uproar-over-supreme-court-leak-on-roe-v-wade-224101850.html
let me stop your lie before it gets too far along...

"https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/verify/scotus-verify/what-justices-gorsuch-barrett-kavanaugh-said-roe-v-wade-confirmation-hearings/536-cdc8cbaa-cf81-4db9-a861-05ea5fbcb05a

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26757
Clock
05 May 22

The post that was quoted here has been removed
States rights to what?

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37388
Clock
05 May 22

@mott-the-hoople said
let me stop your lie before it gets too far along...

"https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/verify/scotus-verify/what-justices-gorsuch-barrett-kavanaugh-said-roe-v-wade-confirmation-hearings/536-cdc8cbaa-cf81-4db9-a861-05ea5fbcb05a
So, basically, they all said, yeah, Roe v. Wade is a precedent of the Court, but F--- precedent.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
05 May 22

@jimm619 said
''WE WILL RESPECT PRECEDENT....IT'S SETTLED LAW.''
https://news.yahoo.com/polling-on-abortion-helps-explain-uproar-over-supreme-court-leak-on-roe-v-wade-224101850.html
''We decided that all previous statements were inoperable.''
........................Ron Ziegler, Richard Nixon's press secretary.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
05 May 22

@suzianne said
So, basically, they all said, yeah, Roe v. Wade is a precedent of the Court, but F--- precedent.
I still wonder if Kavanaugh will eventually sign on to Alito's opinion. I note that Roberts name wasn't on the draft, so it seems likely he's writing a separate opinion. An educated guess would be it's a concurrence upholding Arkansas ban on abortions after 15 weeks as not an "undue burden" under Casey (statistically rather few abortions occur after 15 weeks). I still think there's a chance Kavanaugh would join such an opinion and kick the can of overruling Roe and Casey down the road.

There's a plausible theory that the leak was from a conservative clerk hoping to lock in the 5 votes because if any change them now it will look like they caved to public pressure.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
05 May 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
I still wonder if Kavanaugh will eventually sign on to Alito's opinion. I note that Roberts name wasn't on the draft, so it seems likely he's writing a separate opinion. An educated guess would be it's a concurrence upholding Arkansas ban on abortions after 15 weeks as not an "undue burden" under Casey (statistically rather few abortions occur after 15 weeks). I still thi ...[text shortened]... lock in the 5 votes because if any change them now it will look like they caved to public pressure.
Heard that, conservative leaked theory, myself....Sounds very
plausible and nefarious enough to be GOP plotted.
Do you believe this, 'leaked overturn,' could backfire an The GOP
and really get out the vote for Dems and diminish these TRUMP stars chances?
........I believe Roberts will be one of the 4 too.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
05 May 22

@averagejoe1 said
It appears that Susie thinks Scotus should consider the will of the people when they make decisions. Unbelievable.
Everyone changing the topic to avoid the question. This thread regards whether or not these three justices, who clearly interviewed (recently) for the job saying one thing and now all miraculously are saying the opposite thing, committed perjury.

I think they did.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
05 May 22

@suzianne said
What days are numbered?

Putting up with men who are arrogant, violent, or too concerned with their own needs that they just can't be bothered with ours?

Good. A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.
woman and fish in the same sentence 😂😂😂

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54588
Clock
05 May 22

@no1marauder said
I still wonder if Kavanaugh will eventually sign on to Alito's opinion. I note that Roberts name wasn't on the draft, so it seems likely he's writing a separate opinion. An educated guess would be it's a concurrence upholding Arkansas ban on abortions after 15 weeks as not an "undue burden" under Casey (statistically rather few abortions occur after 15 weeks). I still thi ...[text shortened]... lock in the 5 votes because if any change them now it will look like they caved to public pressure.
A lib twit did it. Shall we wager?

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54588
Clock
05 May 22

@wildgrass said
Everyone changing the topic to avoid the question. This thread regards whether or not these three justices, who clearly interviewed (recently) for the job saying one thing and now all miraculously are saying the opposite thing, committed perjury.

I think they did.
Did Biden lie as well, when he promised to bring us all together at his inauguration? You have noted, I presume, his recent speeches, esp about abortion. He is as divisive as a man can be.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
05 May 22

@averagejoe1 said
Did Biden lie as well, when he promised to bring us all together at his inauguration? You have noted, I presume, his recent speeches, esp about abortion. He is as divisive as a man can be.
That's obviously an extremely broad and subjective statement by Biden. Moreover it doesn't approach answering the question. The judicial nominees all swore on the bible and then answered a very specific, actionable question under oath and are now doing the exact opposite of their answer. It seems they lied under oath.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
05 May 22

@averagejoe1 said
A lib twit did it. Shall we wager?
sounds cruzish...lol

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
05 May 22

@suzianne said
So, basically, they all said, yeah, Roe v. Wade is a precedent of the Court, but F--- precedent.
no, they said what they said...YOU want to make it out to something else...

tell libs they cant kill babies and they throw a hissy fit...next thing you know the will be teaching our kindergartners about sex, and perverted sex at that...oh...wait

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
05 May 22

@mott-the-hoople said
no, they said what they said...YOU want to make it out to something else...

tell libs they cant kill babies and they throw a hissy fit...next thing you know the will be teaching our kindergartners about sex, and perverted sex at that...oh...wait
They said what they said ( of course) but did they lie under oath?

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
05 May 22
1 edit

@suzianne said
So, I used to ask whodey this when he went off on this tangent:

So then are you in favor of making contraceptives available for every woman of child-bearing age? No? Then you can shove your anti-choice nonsense.
They're the first folks to be against the dispensation
of free condoms....even during The AIDS epidemic.
They always resist needle exchange programs
that are proven life savers as well....
Oh, pardon me, good Christians, love your neighbor,
and your gun............ yada, yada yada.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.