05 May 22
@jimm619 saidlet me stop your lie before it gets too far along...
''WE WILL RESPECT PRECEDENT....IT'S SETTLED LAW.''
https://news.yahoo.com/polling-on-abortion-helps-explain-uproar-over-supreme-court-leak-on-roe-v-wade-224101850.html
"https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/verify/scotus-verify/what-justices-gorsuch-barrett-kavanaugh-said-roe-v-wade-confirmation-hearings/536-cdc8cbaa-cf81-4db9-a861-05ea5fbcb05a
05 May 22
@mott-the-hoople saidSo, basically, they all said, yeah, Roe v. Wade is a precedent of the Court, but F--- precedent.
let me stop your lie before it gets too far along...
"https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/verify/scotus-verify/what-justices-gorsuch-barrett-kavanaugh-said-roe-v-wade-confirmation-hearings/536-cdc8cbaa-cf81-4db9-a861-05ea5fbcb05a
05 May 22
@jimm619 said''We decided that all previous statements were inoperable.''
''WE WILL RESPECT PRECEDENT....IT'S SETTLED LAW.''
https://news.yahoo.com/polling-on-abortion-helps-explain-uproar-over-supreme-court-leak-on-roe-v-wade-224101850.html
........................Ron Ziegler, Richard Nixon's press secretary.
05 May 22
@suzianne saidI still wonder if Kavanaugh will eventually sign on to Alito's opinion. I note that Roberts name wasn't on the draft, so it seems likely he's writing a separate opinion. An educated guess would be it's a concurrence upholding Arkansas ban on abortions after 15 weeks as not an "undue burden" under Casey (statistically rather few abortions occur after 15 weeks). I still think there's a chance Kavanaugh would join such an opinion and kick the can of overruling Roe and Casey down the road.
So, basically, they all said, yeah, Roe v. Wade is a precedent of the Court, but F--- precedent.
There's a plausible theory that the leak was from a conservative clerk hoping to lock in the 5 votes because if any change them now it will look like they caved to public pressure.
@no1marauder saidHeard that, conservative leaked theory, myself....Sounds very
I still wonder if Kavanaugh will eventually sign on to Alito's opinion. I note that Roberts name wasn't on the draft, so it seems likely he's writing a separate opinion. An educated guess would be it's a concurrence upholding Arkansas ban on abortions after 15 weeks as not an "undue burden" under Casey (statistically rather few abortions occur after 15 weeks). I still thi ...[text shortened]... lock in the 5 votes because if any change them now it will look like they caved to public pressure.
plausible and nefarious enough to be GOP plotted.
Do you believe this, 'leaked overturn,' could backfire an The GOP
and really get out the vote for Dems and diminish these TRUMP stars chances?
........I believe Roberts will be one of the 4 too.
05 May 22
@averagejoe1 saidEveryone changing the topic to avoid the question. This thread regards whether or not these three justices, who clearly interviewed (recently) for the job saying one thing and now all miraculously are saying the opposite thing, committed perjury.
It appears that Susie thinks Scotus should consider the will of the people when they make decisions. Unbelievable.
I think they did.
05 May 22
@no1marauder saidA lib twit did it. Shall we wager?
I still wonder if Kavanaugh will eventually sign on to Alito's opinion. I note that Roberts name wasn't on the draft, so it seems likely he's writing a separate opinion. An educated guess would be it's a concurrence upholding Arkansas ban on abortions after 15 weeks as not an "undue burden" under Casey (statistically rather few abortions occur after 15 weeks). I still thi ...[text shortened]... lock in the 5 votes because if any change them now it will look like they caved to public pressure.
05 May 22
@wildgrass saidDid Biden lie as well, when he promised to bring us all together at his inauguration? You have noted, I presume, his recent speeches, esp about abortion. He is as divisive as a man can be.
Everyone changing the topic to avoid the question. This thread regards whether or not these three justices, who clearly interviewed (recently) for the job saying one thing and now all miraculously are saying the opposite thing, committed perjury.
I think they did.
05 May 22
@averagejoe1 saidThat's obviously an extremely broad and subjective statement by Biden. Moreover it doesn't approach answering the question. The judicial nominees all swore on the bible and then answered a very specific, actionable question under oath and are now doing the exact opposite of their answer. It seems they lied under oath.
Did Biden lie as well, when he promised to bring us all together at his inauguration? You have noted, I presume, his recent speeches, esp about abortion. He is as divisive as a man can be.
05 May 22
@suzianne saidno, they said what they said...YOU want to make it out to something else...
So, basically, they all said, yeah, Roe v. Wade is a precedent of the Court, but F--- precedent.
tell libs they cant kill babies and they throw a hissy fit...next thing you know the will be teaching our kindergartners about sex, and perverted sex at that...oh...wait
05 May 22
@mott-the-hoople saidThey said what they said ( of course) but did they lie under oath?
no, they said what they said...YOU want to make it out to something else...
tell libs they cant kill babies and they throw a hissy fit...next thing you know the will be teaching our kindergartners about sex, and perverted sex at that...oh...wait
@suzianne saidThey're the first folks to be against the dispensation
So, I used to ask whodey this when he went off on this tangent:
So then are you in favor of making contraceptives available for every woman of child-bearing age? No? Then you can shove your anti-choice nonsense.
of free condoms....even during The AIDS epidemic.
They always resist needle exchange programs
that are proven life savers as well....
Oh, pardon me, good Christians, love your neighbor,
and your gun............ yada, yada yada.