15 Jul 23
How much the lawsuit will actually end up costing Fox is unclear because there are ways it can defray some of the expense, primarily through insurance and the use of tax deductions.
https://apnews.com/article/fox-dominion-lawsuit-settlement-election-6a729ece4b4f351a6334be13b49d4869
I created this thread to prevent so many democrats from falsely claiming Fox paid Dominion $787.5M. It never happened and probably never will. So please stop spreading misinformation.
@metal-brain saidThe only thing this thread is going to stop is people thinking you are anything but a 14 year old, monkey spanking, incel.
How much the lawsuit will actually end up costing Fox is unclear because there are ways it can defray some of the expense, primarily through insurance and the use of tax deductions.
https://apnews.com/article/fox-dominion-lawsuit-settlement-election-6a729ece4b4f351a6334be13b49d4869
I created this thread to prevent so many democrats from falsely claiming Fox paid Dominion $787.5M. It never happened and probably never will. So please stop spreading misinformation.
Actually, this thread has little to do with that, that’s already the image you ooze.
@metal-brain saidYou're a pathetic moron. Nowhere in the article does it says that Dominion won't get paid the full amount of the settlement made by it and Fox because of the lies on the network regarding the company. That Fox might be able to deduct the payment from its taxes doesn't mean it isn't paying Dominion the full amount; it merely means it will be able to defray part of the cost of that payment. Find a dictionary and look up the word "defray" for further information.
How much the lawsuit will actually end up costing Fox is unclear because there are ways it can defray some of the expense, primarily through insurance and the use of tax deductions.
https://apnews.com/article/fox-dominion-lawsuit-settlement-election-6a729ece4b4f351a6334be13b49d4869
I created this thread to prevent so many democrats from falsely claiming Fox paid Dominion $787.5M. It never happened and probably never will. So please stop spreading misinformation.
So "Fox will pay Dominion $787.5 million" is true.
@no1marauder
Do you really think the troll MB cares a whit about TRUTH?
Truth is a variable to a troll like MB.
@sonhouse saidHe's too stupid to be a troll; he actually believes everything zerohedge, global research, Tucker Carlson and the rest tell him.
@no1marauder
Do you really think the troll MB cares a whit about TRUTH?
Truth is a variable to a troll like MB.
@no1marauder saidOnce again, what lies?
You're a pathetic moron. Nowhere in the article does it says that Dominion won't get paid the full amount of the settlement made by it and Fox because of the lies on the network regarding the company. That Fox might be able to deduct the payment from its taxes doesn't mean it isn't paying Dominion the full amount; it merely means it will be able to defray part of the cos ...[text shortened]... up the word "defray" for further information.
So "Fox will pay Dominion $787.5 million" is true.
You keep evading this important question. Everyone knows why. Tucker did not lie about Dominion. There is no evidence Fox will have to pay the full amount and that is a fact.
"So "Fox will pay Dominion $787.5 million" is true."
That is a lie and you know it. You are a pathetic liar!
@metal-brain saidLMAO! "No evidence" but a settlement agreement filed in court.
Once again, what lies?
You keep evading this important question. Everyone knows why. Tucker did not lie about Dominion. There is no evidence Fox will have to pay the full amount and that is a fact.
"So "Fox will pay Dominion $787.5 million" is true."
That is a lie and you know it. You are a pathetic liar!
You also might want to check out p. 43 of that court's decision regarding an attempt by Fox to dismiss the case, to wit:
"The evidence developed in this civil proceeding demonstrates that is CRYSTAL clear that none of the Statements relating to Dominion about the 2020 election are true."
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23736885-dominion-v-fox-summary-judgment
You really are a pathetic fool.
EDIT: "The wild allegations in the statements fell into four broad categories: that Dominion conducted election fraud, that it used algorithms to flip votes, that it had ties to Venezuela and that politicians received kickbacks to use the company."
https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/17/media/dominion-fox-news-allegations/index.html
The judge found every one of those claims, which you have mindlessly repeated here many times, to be false.
15 Jul 23
@no1marauder saidYou are the pathetic fool. A settlement does not prove anything, especially when it is a propaganda outlet that was looking for an excuse to get rid of Carlson.
LMAO! "No evidence" but a settlement agreement filed in court.
You also might want to check out p. 43 of that court's decision regarding an attempt by Fox to dismiss the case, to wit:
"The evidence developed in this civil proceeding demonstrates that is CRYSTAL clear that none of the Statements relating to Dominion about the 2020 election are true."
https://www.d ...[text shortened]... umentcloud.org/documents/23736885-dominion-v-fox-summary-judgment
You really are a pathetic fool.
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/forensic-analysis-of-dominion-voting-machines.196847
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/14/michigan-judge-allows-release-report-antrim-county-voting/6537394002/
From the link above:
"The report, authored by Russell James Ramsland, Jr., who is part of Allied Security Operations Group's (ASOG) management team, says the group found an "error rate" of 68% when examining "the tabulation log" of the server for Antrim County. It's also unclear what the "error rate" data refers to specifically and how it impacts the results.
"The results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable," Ramsland wrote. "This is a result of machine and/or software error, not human error."
15 Jul 23
@Metal-Brain
no1 wants you to believe Allied Security Operations Group's official forensic audit should be disregarded because some democrats from Michigan have a differing opinion after trying to block the release of the official forensic audit claiming it would compromise election integrity, which was a lie. The real reason is they did not want people to know the findings of the official forensic audit because they did not like the result of that audit.
So no1 thinks you should believe the liars over the official forensic audit results.
He also wants you to believe Tucker accepting the official forensic audit over the democrat liars makes Tucker a liar. Like Tucker, I do not believe Dominion vote flipping affected the result of the election in Michigan or the nation. Does that contradict asserting their was vote flipping? NO!
Vote flipping happened. That does not mean it changed the result of the election. The two are completely compatible.
@metal-brain saidThat fraudulent "audit" was laughed out of court.
You are the pathetic fool. A settlement does not prove anything, especially when it is a propaganda outlet that was looking for an excuse to get rid of Carlson.
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/forensic-analysis-of-dominion-voting-machines.196847
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/14/michigan-judge-allows-release-report-antrim-county-vo ...[text shortened]... certifiable," Ramsland wrote. "This is a result of machine and/or software error, not human error."
That you cite to it a thousand times doesn't make it any less laughable; it just shows again what a pathetic, gullible fool you are.
That Fox News would agree to pay Dominion $787.5 million just to have an excuse to fire Carlson is ridiculous idiocy.
15 Jul 23
@no1marauder saidYou are lying. Prove it was " laughed out of court".
That fraudulent "audit" was laughed out of court.
That you cite to it a thousand times doesn't make it any less laughable; it just shows again what a pathetic, gullible fool you are.
That Fox News would agree to pay Dominion $787.5 million just to have an excuse to fire Carlson is ridiculous idiocy.
Opinions are like buttholes, everyone has one. You want us to believe Tucker not believing the right opinions made him a liar. There was only one forensic audit of dominion voting machines and democrats did not seek another........because they knew the result would not change. Otherwise they would have sought a second forensic audit, which they failed to do.
15 Jul 23
1 edit
@metal-brain saidLMAO! A real statewide audit was done in Michigan:
You are lying. Prove it was " laughed out of court".
Opinions are like buttholes, everyone has one. You want us to believe Tucker not believing the right opinions made him a liar. There was only one forensic audit of dominion voting machines and democrats did not seek another........because they knew the result would not change. Otherwise they would have sought a second forensic audit, which they failed to do.
"Determining that Bailey’s claims were moot, the judge noted the audit had already been conducted.
“I am saying that, as pled, the plaintiff’s request for an audit is not available,” Elsenheimer said. “[An audit] did occur and it appears to have been done so pursuant to authority.”
“Granting judgment to the plaintiff on its claims would have no practical legal effect as the audit available under article 2 section 4 1H has already been done,” the judge added. “There is no reason to do it twice as the plaintiff has no additional relief available there is no need to review the remaining counts it has brought.”
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/[WORD TOO LONG]/
Judge Elsenheimer is the one who allowed the public release of the report pursuant to the case he dismissed above. https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/14/michigan-judge-allows-release-report-antrim-county-voting/6537394002/
Tucker didn't believe the crap he was putting on the air:
"In a text on November 9, Carlson referenced Powell’s Dominion claims, commenting, “The software s*** is absurd.” (Carlson then said on television that night, “We don’t know anything about the software that many say was rigged. We don’t know. We ought to find out.&rdquo😉
Per Slate, around November 16, Carlson texted a producer that “Sidney Powell is lying. [expletive deleted] bitch.” He also called Powell an “unguided missile,” “dangerous as hell,” and a “crazy person.”
“Sidney Powell is lying by the way. I caught her. It’s insane,” Carlson texted Ingraham on November 18.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/05/all-the-texts-fox-news-didnt-want-you-to-read.html
16 Jul 23
@no1marauder saidSidney Powell probably did tell lies, but that does not prove Tucker lied. What does Powell have to do with Tucker?
LMAO! A real statewide audit was done in Michigan:
"Determining that Bailey’s claims were moot, the judge noted the audit had already been conducted.
“I am saying that, as pled, the plaintiff’s request for an audit is not available,” Elsenheimer said. “[An audit] did occur and it appears to have been done so pursuant to authority.”
“Granting judgment to th ...[text shortened]... er 18.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/05/all-the-texts-fox-news-didnt-want-you-to-read.html
You have proven nothing. You have not even proved Fox has paid Dominion anything yet. Can you do that? I doubt it. It is likely pending appeal.
16 Jul 23
@metal-brain saidYou can't appeal a civil settlement, idiot.
Sidney Powell probably did tell lies, but that does not prove Tucker lied. What does Powell have to do with Tucker?
You have proven nothing. You have not even proved Fox has paid Dominion anything yet. Can you do that? I doubt it. It is likely pending appeal.
16 Jul 23
@Metal-Brain
The fantasy is in your commie brain, you are ONLY interested in causing chaos, you have ZERO interest in actual truth. The more you post the more you prove you are an absolute MORON. And that is not a pejorative, THAT is the truth.