@metal-brain saidI can read just fine, but I don't have to accept ZeroHedge's conclusions.
Special Counsel John Durham revealed in a court filing that the Hillary Clinton campaign plotted to infiltrate the Trump campaign along with White House computer servers in order to fabricate allegations of Russian collusion.
Learn to read.
14 Feb 22
@no1marauder saidSo facts don't matter?
I can read just fine, but I don't have to accept ZeroHedge's conclusions.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
14 Feb 22
@contenchess said= Sure, Iibs and MueIIer
Remember when you libtards kept screaming about Russian collusion? 😄
@metal-brain saidZeroHedge's claim that there was an attempt to "fabricate allegations of Russian collusion" isn't a "fact".
So facts don't matter?
Durham's filings show that there was an attempt to uncover evidence, not to fabricate, it (although he tries to minimize the evidence):
"The Government’s evidence at trial will establish that these additional allegations relied, in part, on the purported DNS traffic that Tech Executive-1 and others had assembled pertaining to Trump Tower, Donald Trump’s New York City apartment building, the EOP, and the aforementioned healthcare provider. In his meeting with Agency-2, the defendant provided data which he claimed reflected purportedly suspicious DNS lookups by these entities of internet protocol (“IP” ) addresses affiliated with a Russian mobile phone provider (“Russian Phone Provider-1” ). The defendant further claimed that these lookups demonstrated that Trump and/or his associates were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations. The Special Counsel’s Office has identified no support for these allegations. Indeed, more complete DNS data that the Special Counsel’s Office obtained from a company that assisted Tech Executive-1 in assembling these allegations reflects that such DNS lookups were far from rare in the United States. For example,the more complete data that Tech Executive-1 and his associates gathered – but did not provide toAgency-2 – reflected that between approximately 2014 and 2017, there were a total of more than 3 million lookups of Russian Phone-Provider-1 IP addresses that originated with U.S.-based IP addresses. Fewer than 1,000 of these lookups originated with IP addresses affiliated with Trump Tower. "
https://www.scribd.com/document/558443477/US-v-Sussmann-GOVERNMENT-S-MOTION-TO-INQUIRE-INTO-POTENTIAL-CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST
@no1marauder saidIt seems like a lot of scary sounding words like "infiltrate" and fabricate" and "spy" on Trump, but what were the alleged crimes committed?
ZeroHedge's claim that there was an attempt to "fabricate allegations of Russian collusion" isn't a "fact".
Durham's filings show that there was an attempt to uncover evidence, not to fabricate, it (although he tries to minimize the evidence):
"The Government’s evidence at trial will establish that these additional allegations relied, in part, on the purported DNS t ...[text shortened]... document/558443477/US-v-Sussmann-GOVERNMENT-S-MOTION-TO-INQUIRE-INTO-POTENTIAL-CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST
Also, the piece you quoted here shows Durham saying that Trump Tower servers were communicating with Russian IP banks 1,000 times?
14 Feb 22
1 edit
@contenchess saidAnd it turned out to be true.
Remember when you libtards kept screaming about Russian collusion? 😄
You can only run around with your fingers in your ears saying "nuh-uh, nuh-UH" for so long.
@metal-brain saidIt's called opposition research. Learn to read.
Special Counsel John Durham revealed in a court filing that the Hillary Clinton campaign plotted to infiltrate the Trump campaign along with White House computer servers in order to fabricate allegations of Russian collusion.
Learn to read.
In the end, they didn't have to fabricate anything, did they?
A Trump attack dog says they did.
Oh, well, that's convincing.
14 Feb 22
@no1marauder said"Durham's filings show that there was an attempt to uncover evidence, not to fabricate, it"
ZeroHedge's claim that there was an attempt to "fabricate allegations of Russian collusion" isn't a "fact".
Durham's filings show that there was an attempt to uncover evidence, not to fabricate, it (although he tries to minimize the evidence):
"The Government’s evidence at trial will establish that these additional allegations relied, in part, on the purported DNS t ...[text shortened]... document/558443477/US-v-Sussmann-GOVERNMENT-S-MOTION-TO-INQUIRE-INTO-POTENTIAL-CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST
None of what you posted indicates that. In other words, you are making it up.
@metal-brain saidBang on.
Special Counsel John Durham revealed in a court filing that the Hillary Clinton campaign plotted to infiltrate the Trump campaign along with White House computer servers in order to fabricate allegations of Russian collusion.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/bigger-watergate-trump-furious-after-durham-spy-scandal-bombshell-demands-prosecutions
It was a conspiracy ...[text shortened]... t people do when they don't have any evidence. They fabricate it to start a false conspiracy theory.
But as we all know, the criminal, HRC, is exempt from prosecution as we witnessed with
her being excused for crimes committed in her illegal mail server fiasco.
In other words, democrats, high-five each other now :HUGS: