Fabricating allegations of Russian collusion

@metal-brain said
They did not damage HRC's campaign. It was damaging to DWS and despite Shultz's being damaged goods after resigning from the DNC in disgrace HRC still hired DWS to work on her campaign.

HRC damaged herself by hiring DWS to work on her campaign. That was a self inflicted wound. It is pretty lame of you to blame foreign actors for HRC rewarding the loyalty of DWS knowi ...[text shortened]... have not presented a single damaging e-mail to HRC except illegal stuff you seem to want to condone.

@no1marauder said
To repeat:

if you can't see the difference between a person working for the DNC Committee "meddling" in a US election and the Russian government doing so, then you are truly stupider than I thought possible.

Your uniformed political analysis aside, the stolen e-mails revealed information that was detrimental to HRC's campaign and were meant to damage it by those who ...[text shortened]... t) and those who released them (Wikileaks). Just like George Papadopoulos was told in April of 2016.

@metal-brain said
What difference does it make who is election meddling? Is there good election meddling? That must be it. You think DWS was a good election meddler. Furthermore, you are offended that someone snitched on a good election meddler like DWS. Good election meddling must be covered up and hidden. That is what you believe, isn't it?

"On or about April 26, 2016, defendant PAPADOPOULOS met the Professor for breakfast at a London hotel. During this meeting, the Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS that he had just returned from a trip to Moscow where he had met with high level Russian government officials. The Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS that on that trip he (the Professor) learned that the Russians had obtained "dirt" on then-candidate
Clinton. The Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS, as defendant PAPADOPOULOS

later described to the FBI, that "They [the Russians] have dirt on her"; "the Russians had emails of Clinton"; "they have thousands of emails."

https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download pp. 6-7

So Mifsud got his info from " high level Russian government officials." And by some amazing coincidence, thousands of DNC and HRC Campaign e-mails were released!

@no1marauder said
I don't think that what DWS did was "meddling" at all. But even assuming it was, the law doesn't ban a member of the DNC Committee having a preference for one candidate over the other.
However, it surely bans foreign governments from interfering in our elections by stealing materials from one of our political parties.

You really can't grasp the difference?

I am off ...[text shortened]... for HRC as somehow equal to a foreign government's blatant interference with a US election is loony.

@no1marauder said
"On or about April 26, 2016, defendant PAPADOPOULOS met the Professor for breakfast at a London hotel. During this meeting, the Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS that he had just returned from a trip to Moscow where he had met with high level Russian government officials. The Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS that on that trip he (the Professor) learned tha ...[text shortened]... fficials." And by some amazing coincidence, thousands of DNC and HRC Campaign e-mails were released!

@metal-brain said
Stop being paranoid. You are creeping me out.

Russia never made it a secret they didn't like HRC. That proves nothing. She is a war monger who wanted to shoot down Russian planes over Syria. Of course Russia had no love for her.
I don't like her either. Don't like Bill. Don't like Trump either, but there is no evidence he colluded with Russia. The DNC had ties to that Russian lawyer too.

@kevin-eleven said
And here I thought I was winnowing you out.

Nobody here likes the Clintons. I feel sorry for their unfortunate daughter.

But here is the problem with Russia, and please feel free to report this back to your handlers: At the moment it has only one single point of failure, and that is Putin. J/K, that isn't the problem.

"Russia" -- which currently means the so-cal ...[text shortened]... various territories could live their own lives in their own ways, perhaps to the benefit of others.

@metal-brain said
There were no emails that had dirt on HRC.
You still have not provided a single example.

@wildgrass said
What would be the motivation for taking a pile of official government documents and shoving them down the toilet?

@sleepyguy said
Being pursued by an group of deep state traitors involved in a criminal conspiracy to undermine a duly elected President?

@kevin-eleven said
It's clear that you are part of the Russian disinformation campaign against the West.

Good thing Mr. Putin only pays you with a free subscription to his tea-club membership, because you are not very good at what you seem to attempt.

Furthermore, as a former Michigander (the cuff of the Mitten, not the Upper Peninsula), I am as disappointed for Michigan as I am for Russia.

@no1marauder said
Jesus Christ, what Papadopoulos heard has been established to have been true and it doesn't matter how many times you lie and call it a "false rumor".

Numerous Trump campaign officials and associates lied about their contacts with Russians (including Papadopoulos). Some were convicted of doing so, some were given pardons by Trump for doing so.

@Metal-Brain
FACTS NEVER matter to the likes of you, your brain really is made of metal, and silicon just does not make good brains.

@Sleepyguy
You mean the duly elected BIDEN.
Trump FUKKING LOST BY MILLIONS OF VOTES so don't pull the OBVIOUS FRAUD BULLSHYTE.