Fox News attacks Alexander Vindman

@no1marauder said
A) The "transcript" wasn't a transcript (it says so right on it) and it has now been shown that words and phrases were omitted from it (though Trump has repeatedly lied and said it was an exact transcript);

B) Vindman gave first hand testimony about various meetings where Sondland made it clear that a "quid pro quo" was presented to the Ukrainians.

What allegedly was omitted?

@sonhouse said
@Sleepyguy
So you figure if Trump *god forbid* wins in 2020 BECAUSE of dirt gotten by pressuring a foreign government by withholding military aid to the tune of 400 million dollars is not a thing of value? Tell me again what planet you are from?

A planet where dirty people lose elections. Do you even realize what you are saying? You are saying that finding out a democrat is corrupt is something that should be hidden. Why do you want to sweep corruption under the rug just because it is a corrupt democrat?
It is only of value if it reveals he is corrupt. Wouldn't you prefer that whoever wins the nomination is free of corruption? Apparently not. You are condoning corruption.