Go back
gas vs. diesel

gas vs. diesel

Debates

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
09 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

i don't get it. gas is $4.005 a gallon, and diesel is $4.762. shouldn't gas cost more? it should cost more to refine it. and i thought it would contain more energy by weight.

j
Some guy

Joined
22 Jan 07
Moves
12299
Clock
09 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Diesel is still refined from petroleum. It's cheaper to produce, yes, but demand is higher because it's used more in industry, so the price is higher at the moment.

You might be confusing with it with biodiesel?

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
09 Jun 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by joneschr
Diesel is still refined from petroleum. It's cheaper to produce, yes, but demand is higher because it's used more in industry, so the price is higher at the moment.

You might be confusing with it with biodiesel?
In NZ diesel is cheaper, try looking into the tax component. As the price of fuel rises the guvamint is laughing - tax is a percentage of the price of fuel.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26754
Clock
09 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wajoma
In NZ diesel is cheaper, try looking into the tax component. As the price of fuel rises the guvamint is laughing - tax is a percentage of the price of fuel.
I'd think you'd know that higher prices due to lower supply do not increase revenue.

kmax87
Republicant Retiree

Blade Runner

Joined
09 Oct 04
Moves
107144
Clock
09 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
I'd think you'd know that higher prices due to lower supply do not increase revenue.
But at least it might maintain existing levels of revenue, as the increase in pump price will generate more revenue if the tax is a percentage of the price and not a flat rate per volume sold.

twhitehead

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
Clock
09 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
I'd think you'd know that higher prices due to lower supply do not increase revenue.
But the higher price is not necessarily due to lower supply. In fact it is probably mostly due to increased demand - globally. Even if there is lower supply globally that does not mean that a given government will not benefit from the taxes.
In South Africa, a large percentage of our fuel is made locally from Coal but the price is set based on international fuel prices. So whoever is making that fuel is getting increased profits.

kmax87
Republicant Retiree

Blade Runner

Joined
09 Oct 04
Moves
107144
Clock
09 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by twhitehead

In South Africa, a large percentage of our fuel is made locally from Coal but the price is set based on international fuel prices. So whoever is making that fuel is getting increased profits.
A similar scam operates in Australia where we have enough oil to look after ourselves, but we still end up paying a price at the pump that reflects the international oil price. I suppose if it were not for our own oil we would probably pay more. At AU$1.70/litre that makes our fuel about AU$ 7.65 / gallon which with our Australian dollar trading at 96.2 US cents we would be paying $7.36 US for our fuel per gallon. That surely puts into perspective the bargain basement price Americans pay for their fuel.

kmax87
Republicant Retiree

Blade Runner

Joined
09 Oct 04
Moves
107144
Clock
09 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

A quick comparison from the CIA World Fact Book.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2173.html
Australia produces 572,400 bbl/day (2005 est.), consumes 903,200 bbl/day (2005 est.), exports 333,200 bbl/day (2004) and imports 611,400 bbl/day (2004) of oil.
America produces 8.322 million bbl/day (2005 est.) consumes 20.8 million bbl/day (2005 est.) exports 1.048 million bbl/day (2004) and imports 13.15 million bbl/day (2004) of oil.

If we normalize these results to our respective nations production, then Australia consumes 1.57 times more oil than it produces. It exports 0. 58 (slightly over half) of what it produces and imports 1.068 times as much oil as it produces.

The US on the other hand consumes 2.49 times as much oil as it produces, exporting 0.1259( a sliver over an eighth ) of its production while it imports 1.58 times as much oil as it produces, yet pays a pump price of (4.00/7.36) 0.5434 or 54% of the pump price that Australians would pay for the same gallon of oil. Can anyone tell me if this reality satisfies the dictionary definition of being fleeced.

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
09 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

well, you're living in a democracy. throw the bums out!

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26754
Clock
11 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kmax87
A similar scam operates in Australia where we have enough oil to look after ourselves, but we still end up paying a price at the pump that reflects the international oil price. I suppose if it were not for our own oil we would probably pay more. At AU$1.70/litre that makes our fuel about AU$ 7.65 / gallon which with our Australian dollar trading at 96.2 US ...[text shortened]... llon. That surely puts into perspective the bargain basement price Americans pay for their fuel.
Someone has to process Australian oil. Why should they sell it to you for cheap when so many other people are willing to pay more?

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
11 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
i don't get it. gas is $4.005 a gallon, and diesel is $4.762. shouldn't gas cost more? it should cost more to refine it. and i thought it would contain more energy by weight.
I say the liberals are behind it. It stands to reason that if they don't want SUV's on the road burning up all that fuel they don't want semi tractor trailors on the road either. Soon we will be reduced to horse and carriage and all will be right with the world.

u
The So Fist

Voice of Reason

Joined
28 Mar 06
Moves
9908
Clock
11 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
I say the liberals are behind it. It stands to reason that if they don't want SUV's on the road burning up all that fuel they don't want semi tractor trailors on the road either. Soon we will be reduced to horse and carriage and all will be right with the world.
LOL...ya, the liberals are lining the pockets of the Oil industry. Exxon made 40 Billion last year. All due to the damned liberals!!

I've heard some doozies, but man, you take the cake with this one.

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
11 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/06/voters_say_drill.html

"
June 10, 2008
Voters Say 'Drill'
By Lawrence Kudlow

The recent spike in oil prices and unemployment is dramatically changing this presidential campaign -- virtually overnight. The near $20 jump in oil to $140 a barrel, the unexpected half-point increase in the jobless rate to 5.5 percent (the biggest monthly increase in twenty years), and the resulting 400-point plunge in stocks has created a new campaign issue right before our eyes.

..."

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89770
Clock
11 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
i don't get it. gas is $4.005 a gallon, and diesel is $4.762. shouldn't gas cost more? it should cost more to refine it. and i thought it would contain more energy by weight.
Gas? You mean petrol?

twhitehead

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
Clock
11 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kmax87
Can anyone tell me if this reality satisfies the dictionary definition of being fleeced.
It depends on a lot of factors.
1. Cost to import. In Zambia we must pipe our fuel from Tanzania, which adds to the cost. Maybe Australia, having a low population for the area has a less economically efficient distribution system than the US.
2. Taxation structure. In Zambia, the govt adds a 100 percent tax on fuel. Maybe the US gets its tax from elsewhere (sales tax on other products or income tax). European countries also tax the fuel heavily to discourage unnecessarily large cars and other forms of fuel wastage. If the US moved their tax over to the fuel, it would result in a major shift towards more efficient cars in the US.

But at the end of the day, the US has convinced enough people that the dollar is valuable and thus can support their economy simply by printing and selling dollars. That does mean that the rest of us are getting fleeced.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.