Or so it seems in some parts of the U.S.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6743303.stm
Mr Wilson, a former high school honours student and star athlete, was found guilty by a jury of aggravated child molestation for having oral sex with a 15-year-old girl at a New Year's Eve party in 2003.
Under Georgia law, if Mr Wilson had engaged in sexual intercourse with the girl he would have only been charged with a misdemeanour and would have received a much lighter sentence.
Originally posted by SeitseReligion making it's mark on politics...I wish religious people would stop trying to legislate their silly religious rules.
Or so it seems in some parts of the U.S.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6743303.stm
Mr Wilson, a former high school honours student and star athlete, was found guilty by a jury of aggravated child molestation for having [b]oral sex with a 15-year-old girl at a New Year's Eve party in 2003.
Under Georgia law, if Mr Wilson had engag ...[text shortened]... have only been charged with a misdemeanour and would have received a much lighter sentence.[/b]
Originally posted by SeitseThat's some pretty screwed up logic if I ever saw it.
Or so it seems in some parts of the U.S.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6743303.stm
Mr Wilson, a former high school honours student and star athlete, was found guilty by a jury of aggravated child molestation for having [b]oral sex with a 15-year-old girl at a New Year's Eve party in 2003.
Under Georgia law, if Mr Wilson had engag ...[text shortened]... have only been charged with a misdemeanour and would have received a much lighter sentence.[/b]
Originally posted by SeitseI wonder who gave it to who, and would this have any bearing on the sentence.
Or so it seems in some parts of the U.S.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6743303.stm
Mr Wilson, a former high school honours student and star athlete, was found guilty by a jury of aggravated child molestation for having [b]oral sex with a 15-year-old girl at a New Year's Eve party in 2003.
Under Georgia law, if Mr Wilson had engag ...[text shortened]... have only been charged with a misdemeanour and would have received a much lighter sentence.[/b]
Originally posted by twiceaknightMost likely the girl brushed her teeth with the guys' brush.
I wonder who gave it to who, and would this have any bearing on the sentence.
If it was the other way, and I was the guy, I would have killed myself already... Just imagine that! going to prison to go down on a chick? gosh! 😲
Originally posted by SeitseHope the poor guy didn't glaze that doughnut for nothin' .. that's like the massage without the happy ending.
Most likely the girl brushed her teeth with the guys' brush.
If it was the other way, and I was the guy, I would have killed myself already... Just imagine that! going to prison to go down on a chick? gosh! 😲
Yeah ... put 'er in jail!
Originally posted by jammerYou disgust me, in another thread you mention how the brutal killing of a girl will bring the muslim birthrate down and here you're talking about giving blowjobs to 15 year old girls. What is wrong with you?
BJ's don't count in the USA .. by Presidential decree .. not really sex .. depending on what "is" means.
Originally posted by StarrmanWhadaya talking about? She passed the final exam. It's a great career move. Go straight into politics, move to DC .. go for the big bucks .. Monica style.
It's not about what they did, or whether it's consensual it's about how you're talking about an underage girl giving a blow job.
Imagine the proud parents.
So? What's wrong about it?
Ever since when the choice of words is supervised in this forums?
Tell you what. If you want to be the thought police or the Royal
Academy of How-to-Speak-About-Sex, in the general forums your
friend Hand of Hecate is once again kicking hard with his usual gay-
bashing, women-depreciating, sexually-charged posts.
That's a much more worth goal in life than poor ol' jammer and poor
ol' seitse, me thinks.
We're just sad, lonely people speaking about how a teenager had
sexual contact with another teenager.