gone

The post that was quoted here has been removed

This new improved forum feels a lot like the last one. Why bother?

If the mods want to improve the forum in a hurry I can think of one easy move.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

"Wolfe63's latest pose of "Gens una Sumus" is most unconvincing."
- Duchess64

I don't care. Your opinion means nada.

But I do care about new and improved writing: Try one of my "edits" for size.
(Maybe one day I'll beat Duchess64's record of 8 edits for one post...but today's not that day.)
----------------------------------------

"White people", "black people", "brown people" or "oriental people"...it's all the same to me.

What gets my goat are "stupid people".

And so now we can witness the brittle sensitivities of Duchess64's contrarian excuse-machine as they flake off and drop faster than sun-dried paint on a tin shanty.

No "fragilian" she.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Of course not.

But I will doubt your judgement of who is or isn't a white-supremacist, racist, whatever, because you find those things wherever you look, and level the charge relentlessly. I find it hateful and abusive.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Duchess64 mentions repetition in derogatory terms even as she is mindlessly repeating herself.
My Lord! This person can't possibly be for real.

This lady provides us a comedy playground!

@wolfe63 said
Duchess64 mentions repetition in derogatory terms even as she is mindlessly repeating herself.
My Lord! This person can't possibly be for real.

This lady provides us a comedy playground!

Wolfy,
Like I said it appears you like to jump all over the person(s) you consider to be the under dog. Just the opposite of what you claimed.

-VR

@sleepyguy said
Fewer than you do, I'd imagine. The question though, given the recent Great Purge, is how does throwing around that label further reasoned debate?

It obviously doesn't, but complaining about it seems rather fragile snowflaky to me. An overtly racist party has support from 40% of the population, that's obviously only possible if there are a lot of racists in America. I realize it's uncomfortable to talk about, but it's the reality of the situation.

@very-rusty said
Wolfy,
Like I said it appears you like to jump all over the person(s) you consider to be the under dog. Just the opposite of what you claimed.

-VR

Yeah, I've been hard on you Rusty. I'm sorry.

Maybe you shouldn't have called Suzianne a man. I dunno.
What do you think?

@kazetnagorra said
It obviously doesn't, but complaining about it seems rather fragile snowflaky to me. An overtly racist party has support from 40% of the population, that's obviously only possible if there are a lot of racists in America. I realize it's uncomfortable to talk about, but it's the reality of the situation.

Well I disagree with your opinion about who is overtly racist in America, or RHP, but that is not reconcilable and beside the point.

You have conceded that blathering on about who is a racist adds nothing to reasoned debate. We agree.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

I bet most deleted racist posts were yours.