- Joined
- 09 Jan 22
- Moves
- 1139
19 Jan 22
@jimm619 saidOh, you mean the links that you and your friends refuse to look at when we post them, because they are "biased"?
They have a thing called, 'the internet,'
try sending LINKS sometime......
You know, FACTS not OPINIONS
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/opinion
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fact
..........hello? ...........are you there?
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
19 Jan 22
3 edits
@cliff-mashburn saidI ALWAYS LOOK AT THEM~!
Oh, you mean the links that you and your friends refuse to look at when we post them, because they are "biased"?
Why don't you send one about
CRT in American Schools?
Please..........It's not difficult 😛
No fake news\
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_race_theory
https://abcnews.go.com/US/critical-race-theory-classroom-understanding-debate/story?id=77627465
19 Jan 22
@cliff-mashburn saidThere are lots of reputable sources out there. You can't find one to support your claims?
Oh, you mean the links that you and your friends refuse to look at when we post them, because they are "biased"?
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
19 Jan 22
1 edit
@cliff-mashburn saidWHERE?
I've seen how you people operate.
No matter WHAT source is linked, you will always claim it is biased or unreliable.
WHEN?
Talk is cheap. 😛
19 Jan 22
@cliff-mashburn saidClearly not true, and I doubt you actually believe that.
I've seen how you people operate.
No matter WHAT source is linked, you will always claim it is biased or unreliable.
Let me help you out then. Here's a list of reputable sources:
BBC
Al Jazeera
Washington Post
NYT
Times
People
NBC News
Business Insider
Wall Street Journal
Politico
LA Times
PolitiFact
CNBC
The Hill
Reuters
The Independent
The Guardian
ABC News
NewsWeek
Forbes
Associated Press
Bloomberg
The New Yorker
The Atlantic
NPR
NBC News
USA Today
The Economist
Statista
Pretty much any .gov site
Is this not enough for you? You still can't back your points with any of these sites?
26 Jan 22
@earl-of-trumps saidYes, it was wrong.
it is divisive, I agree. the purpose to showing the students is to show what they did WRONG.
the kids can learn by this
160 years ago, these were prominent politicians actively and openly discussing political policies that maintain a hierarchy of race in America. While this is not CRT as taught in college, the subject matter of the debates support the premise of CRT. It should still be taught in school.