Originally posted by Orange PeelGot no problem with that. Dosen't do much for me, but what ever blows your hair back.
What a load of rubbish, building up moral standards from animals.
I had a rottweiler a while ago, who tried to hump my leg a few times.
We as humans rule over the animals, so if you are going to justify the rights and wrongs of homosexuality through animals then you may find the downhill slide will next pertain to marrying them.
Originally posted by Orange Peelit's not a issue of morals (the animal part), it's when people say it's against nature. because it happens in NATURE, then it's not unnatural. moral is a different issue
What a load of rubbish, building up moral standards from animals.
I had a rottweiler a while ago, who tried to hump my leg a few times.
We as humans rule over the animals, so if you are going to justify the rights and wrongs of homosexuality through animals then you may find the downhill slide will next pertain to marrying them.
Originally posted by NemesioWithout Dictionary I wouldn't have been here !!, it is my closer friend now.
Originally posted by ahosyney
[b]Sorry, my English sometimes doesn't help me much. Some parts of your post I didn't get 100%.
Please don't let it discourage you; you will only get better with practice (and a dictionary!) 🙂
You can PM me if a word or phrase confuses you, and I will rephrase for you.
I really find it hard to disattach my ...[text shortened]... bad to eat desert just because it makes me uncomfortable).
Nemesio
Thank you for clarification , I can see your idea now.
Of course being unconforable with something is not enough to say it is bad , or wrong. But there is another point.
I keept my religous out of the way because I know not every one will accpet that. But of course religion beside being unconfortable with it is enough for me 🙂
Thank you again for your help.
Originally posted by slickhareYeah well, it should be stipulated that it isn't about moral standards, so people won't get foolishly led down wrong paths.
it's not a issue of morals (the animal part), it's when people say it's against nature. because it happens in NATURE, then it's not unnatural. moral is a different issue
Natural, is probably a lot to do with environment that animals are placed in.
If my dog had another female dog in the room with him, he would have humped the dog and not got a smack in the head.
Animals do a lot of sick things in the wild, which doesn't hold any ground on how we should live our lives.
Originally posted by Orange Peel"Homosexuality isn't natural"
Yeah well, it should be stipulated that it isn't about moral standards, so people won't get foolishly led down wrong paths.
Natural, is probably a lot to do with environment that animals are placed in.
If my dog had another female dog in the room with him, he would have humped the dog and not got a smack in the head.
Animals do a lot of sick things in the wild, which doesn't hold any ground on how we should live our lives.
"Here's a whole list of animals in nature and homosexuality"
"Well animals are just animals!"
😕
Originally posted by XanthosNZIt goes to reason that homosexuality common in humans will also be found in the wild. Maybe a more interesting way to look at it would be animals that don't resort to homosexuality behaviour, as then you would have something to work from as to why.
"Homosexuality isn't natural"
"Here's a whole list of animals in nature and homosexuality"
"Well animals are just animals!"
😕
Maybe a pair of love-birds who stay committed to their partner for life wouldn't turn to homosexuality.
Originally posted by NemesioInteresting point.
Do a web search on 'mirror neurons.' When we observe people doing a behavior, there is a
part of our brain which (internally) mimics it. That's why we feel revulsion when we see
people eating something that we ourselves don't like. It's a perfectly natural, biological reaction.
It's totally okay (and natural) for a straight person to get the heebie ...[text shortened]... an't engage in those
behaviors simply because of the heebie-jeebies, though.
Nemesio
Do those reactions resist exposure over large periods of time?
Originally posted by Orange PeelI'm really struggling to understand what the hell you're trying to say.
It goes to reason that homosexuality common in humans will also be found in the wild. Maybe a more interesting way to look at it would be animals that don't resort to homosexuality behaviour, as then you would have something to work from as to why.
Maybe a pair of love-birds who stay committed to their partner for life wouldn't turn to homosexuality.
Originally posted by slickhareNo. Your spelling is wrong.
see title
The thing is, right, is if you've never eaten salmon, how on earth do you know if you don't like it?
See.
So, what I propose you do is suck jizzim and have someone's hard-on stuffed up your anus and then once you've actually experienced something, come back and rephrase your question, sharing your experience with us, backed up by some paperwork.