Go back
Homoseuxality: Is it wrong?

Homoseuxality: Is it wrong?

Debates

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Orange Peel
What a load of rubbish, building up moral standards from animals.

I had a rottweiler a while ago, who tried to hump my leg a few times.

We as humans rule over the animals, so if you are going to justify the rights and wrongs of homosexuality through animals then you may find the downhill slide will next pertain to marrying them.
Got no problem with that. Dosen't do much for me, but what ever blows your hair back.

slickhare
...

Santa Clara, CA

Joined
02 Oct 06
Moves
9225
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Orange Peel
What a load of rubbish, building up moral standards from animals.

I had a rottweiler a while ago, who tried to hump my leg a few times.

We as humans rule over the animals, so if you are going to justify the rights and wrongs of homosexuality through animals then you may find the downhill slide will next pertain to marrying them.
it's not a issue of morals (the animal part), it's when people say it's against nature. because it happens in NATURE, then it's not unnatural. moral is a different issue

a

Joined
03 Sep 06
Moves
9895
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nemesio
Originally posted by ahosyney
[b]Sorry, my English sometimes doesn't help me much. Some parts of your post I didn't get 100%.


Please don't let it discourage you; you will only get better with practice (and a dictionary!) 🙂
You can PM me if a word or phrase confuses you, and I will rephrase for you.

I really find it hard to disattach my ...[text shortened]... bad to eat desert just because it makes me uncomfortable).

Nemesio
Without Dictionary I wouldn't have been here !!, it is my closer friend now.

Thank you for clarification , I can see your idea now.

Of course being unconforable with something is not enough to say it is bad , or wrong. But there is another point.

I keept my religous out of the way because I know not every one will accpet that. But of course religion beside being unconfortable with it is enough for me 🙂

Thank you again for your help.

OP

liar.

Joined
08 Nov 06
Moves
392
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by slickhare
it's not a issue of morals (the animal part), it's when people say it's against nature. because it happens in NATURE, then it's not unnatural. moral is a different issue
Yeah well, it should be stipulated that it isn't about moral standards, so people won't get foolishly led down wrong paths.

Natural, is probably a lot to do with environment that animals are placed in.

If my dog had another female dog in the room with him, he would have humped the dog and not got a smack in the head.

Animals do a lot of sick things in the wild, which doesn't hold any ground on how we should live our lives.

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Orange Peel
Yeah well, it should be stipulated that it isn't about moral standards, so people won't get foolishly led down wrong paths.

Natural, is probably a lot to do with environment that animals are placed in.

If my dog had another female dog in the room with him, he would have humped the dog and not got a smack in the head.

Animals do a lot of sick things in the wild, which doesn't hold any ground on how we should live our lives.
"Homosexuality isn't natural"
"Here's a whole list of animals in nature and homosexuality"
"Well animals are just animals!"

😕

OP

liar.

Joined
08 Nov 06
Moves
392
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
"Homosexuality isn't natural"
"Here's a whole list of animals in nature and homosexuality"
"Well animals are just animals!"

😕
It goes to reason that homosexuality common in humans will also be found in the wild. Maybe a more interesting way to look at it would be animals that don't resort to homosexuality behaviour, as then you would have something to work from as to why.

Maybe a pair of love-birds who stay committed to their partner for life wouldn't turn to homosexuality.

P
Upward Spiral

Halfway

Joined
02 Aug 04
Moves
8702
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nemesio
Do a web search on 'mirror neurons.' When we observe people doing a behavior, there is a
part of our brain which (internally) mimics it. That's why we feel revulsion when we see
people eating something that we ourselves don't like. It's a perfectly natural, biological reaction.

It's totally okay (and natural) for a straight person to get the heebie ...[text shortened]... an't engage in those
behaviors simply because of the heebie-jeebies, though.

Nemesio
Interesting point.

Do those reactions resist exposure over large periods of time?

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Orange Peel
It goes to reason that homosexuality common in humans will also be found in the wild. Maybe a more interesting way to look at it would be animals that don't resort to homosexuality behaviour, as then you would have something to work from as to why.

Maybe a pair of love-birds who stay committed to their partner for life wouldn't turn to homosexuality.
I'm really struggling to understand what the hell you're trying to say.

OP

liar.

Joined
08 Nov 06
Moves
392
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
"Homosexuality isn't natural"
"Here's a whole list of animals in nature and homosexuality"
"Well animals are just animals!"

😕
Bulls seem to do it naturally enough. They just like robots. Hump, hump, hump, eat, eat, eat... and then they get killed.

OP

liar.

Joined
08 Nov 06
Moves
392
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
I'm really struggling to understand what the hell you're trying to say.
What is your point about nature, as the topic started was is it wrong../.

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Orange Peel
What is your point about nature, as the topic started was is it wrong../.
Try again, you aren't making sense.

OP

liar.

Joined
08 Nov 06
Moves
392
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ahosyney
[b]Do you say that there is no phychological problems facing homosexuals?
Of course there is psychological problems. If they lived in a world where everyone was gay, those problems would most likely disappear.

OP

liar.

Joined
08 Nov 06
Moves
392
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Try again, you aren't making sense.
Exactly.

slickhare
...

Santa Clara, CA

Joined
02 Oct 06
Moves
9225
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Orange Peel
Yeah well, it should be stipulated that it isn't about moral standards, so people won't get foolishly led down wrong paths.

no, people should be smart enough to discern that themselves.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89784
Clock
26 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by slickhare
see title
No. Your spelling is wrong.

The thing is, right, is if you've never eaten salmon, how on earth do you know if you don't like it?

See.

So, what I propose you do is suck jizzim and have someone's hard-on stuffed up your anus and then once you've actually experienced something, come back and rephrase your question, sharing your experience with us, backed up by some paperwork.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.