13 Feb 06
1 edit
I enjoy the irony of fundamentalist Christians, many of whom categorically reject Darwinism, arguing against homosexuality on the grounds that gays cannot procreate.
Incidentally - as Darv says - why does this matter? I do plenty of things that aren't aimed at procreation (playing chess, for example).
And what's so great about the "natural" world? What's wrong with the internet, aeroplanes, etc?
Chimpanzees don't play football, either, but that doesn't make it a morally bankrupt activity (unless you support Chelsea).
Homophobes of the world, stop trying to rationalise your hatred.
13 Feb 06
1 edit
Originally posted by chancremechanicAs much as I love arguing with you...
The only point I made was that the bunghole is soley intended as an out-hole, i.e., feces exiting the body, not someone inserting a penis into it. What you're talking about, the mouth, is another hole that people use to insert others' penises into, but I wouldn't know about that routine because I'm not gay. Since you brought it up, care to elaborate? What was YOUR point?.......😲
Originally posted by Conrau K
We dont know if homosexuality is caused by genes anyway, so what exactly is wrong with them?
Originally yammered by ChankDick
Well besides inserting their penis into a hole specifically designed to excrete feces, I'd say not much.....
Brilliantly rebutted by darvlay
Heterosexuals do that too. Heterosexual males also put their penises into another hole not specifically designed from procreation. So what exactly is your point?
Knee-jerk reactionby chancremechanic
The only point I made was that the bunghole is soley intended as an out-hole, i.e., feces exiting the body, not someone inserting a penis into it. What you're talking about, the mouth, is another hole that people use to insert others' penises into, but I wouldn't know about that routine because I'm not gay. Since you brought it up, care to elaborate? What was YOUR point?.......😲
So, to elaborate:
Many heterosexual males also commit sodomy (anal and oral sex)with their female partners. You state the only point you made was that anal sex is unnatural. Not true, of course. You also made a point to mention that this is what is mainly wrong with Homosexuality, however sodomy is a part of Heterosexuality as well. So my point is that your argument against Homosexuality is baseless and ridiculous unless you abstain and denounce all forms of sodomy. i.e. receiving fellatio from a woman, performing cunnilingus on a female, etc. Where do you stand on Heterosexual sodomy? Is it unnatural and filthy? Does it repulse you as much as two women making out with each other?
13 Feb 06
Originally posted by dottewellWell put, funny and recced.
I enjoy the irony of fundamentalist Christians, many of whom categorically reject Darwinism, arguing against homosexuality on the grounds that gays cannot procreate.
Incidentally - as Darv says - why does this matter? I do plenty of things that aren't aimed at procreation (playing chess, for example).
And what's so great about the "natural" world? Wh ...[text shortened]... you support Chelsea).
Homophobes of the world, stop trying to rationalise your hatred.
13 Feb 06
Originally posted by chancremechanicBy your own account even "normal" heterosexual sex is crazy, because the girly-hole is an out-hole for pee.
The only point I made was that the bunghole is soley intended as an out-hole, i.e., feces exiting the body, not someone inserting a penis into it.
13 Feb 06
Originally posted by Conrau KYes, there's a difference in the matter of consentual sex there. For good reasons we tend to react with anger and disgust when people unable to defend themselves are abused sexually. So rapists, pedophiles, necrophiles and so on are not accepted by most legal definitions. Whereas homosexuality is a different matter entirely. It may disgust us on a personal level because we ourselves can't imagine being physically intimate with another person of the same sex, but if the people involved; the two or more homosexuals are in consent, then we must learn to accept that. It's not anyone's business if Jack and Joe wants to have a go.
Consider pedophiles. I honestly do not believe one chooses to be attracted to young people. But whether one actually commits pedophilia is different. Some sexual actions are of course taboo and I can understand (and damn well agree) why people object to such relationships.