07 Nov 06
Originally posted by howardgeetheres a difference between killing for food than killing just for the sake of killing. its ok to kill an animal and eat it isnt it?
...eating a fertilised chicken egg is the equivalent of devouring a live chicken.
Think about the ridiculous consequences of your beliefs, all of you
"pro-lifers" .
Then change your stance to the rational acceptance of abortion and embryonic stem cell research.
07 Nov 06
Originally posted by XanthosNZWhat, Xanthos, you don't have your "redwings" yet? What's wrong with these "millenium-generation" whipper-snappers?
Actually eating a chicken egg is the same as eating a woman's period. Eggs you eat are unfertilised.
Howard, I too am pro-choice (stupid label but whatever) but really, stop being an idiot. You're doing more harm than good.
07 Nov 06
Originally posted by EcstremeVenom"I'm bored. Let's abort something!"
theres a difference between killing for food than killing just for the sake of killing. its ok to kill an animal and eat it isnt it?
This might sound way out there, but is it possible that the women who have abortions do so because it would be beneficial to the child? If a woman can't afford to raise the child, would it not be easier on both the mother and the child to get rid of the child before it even becomes a child?
07 Nov 06
Originally posted by JRamboEvery child deserves to be loved.
"I'm bored. Let's abort something!"
This might sound way out there, but is it possible that the women who have abortions do so because it would be beneficial to the child? If a woman can't afford to raise the child, would it not be easier on both the mother and the child to get rid of the child before it even becomes a child?
07 Nov 06
Originally posted by whiteroseFirstly, the "child" in question has yet to be proven (at least, to my knowledge) to qualify as a child. That's like calling an "egg" a "chicken".
Every child deserves to be loved.
Now, as for the love thing. If a woman is prepared to kill the feotus, I fail to see how making her endure the remaining pregnancy will inspire any love for the child in the first place.
07 Nov 06
Originally posted by XanthosNZIf you were born in '86, yes, you are "generation-millenium"...mostly clueless, left-wing-tree-hugging, Converse All Star-wearing weenies, walking around with an i-Pod growing out the side of their heads, no morals, no manners, few ethics, purple hair, bathe twice weekly, mostly atheistic....I could go on, but you get the picture...if not, go look in the mirror. Now, mind you, not ALL "generation-milleniums" fit this catagory...just 70%
You make these statements again and again Chancre but you never actually do anything but state your opinion.
"Abortion is murder."
You state it like a fact when most people don't agree with you. Try providing some actual evidence.
PS. 1986 isn't really millenium-generation is it?
For example: You need proof that killing an innocent pre-born baby in murder....go figure 🙄
Do you need proof that the earth revolves around the sun?
07 Nov 06
Originally posted by JRamboFirstly, the "child" in question represents life! To end life is to kill....look it up in the dictionary...an egg represents a "living" unborn chicken.
Firstly, the "child" in question has yet to be proven (at least, to my knowledge) to qualify as a child. That's like calling an "egg" a "chicken".
Now, as for the love thing. If a woman is prepared to kill the feotus, I fail to see how making her endure the remaining pregnancy will inspire any love for the child in the first place.
07 Nov 06
Originally posted by chancremechanicOf course it's killing. So is shooting a horse with a broken leg.
Firstly, the "child" in question represents life! To end life is to kill....look it up in the dictionary...an egg represents a "living" unborn chicken.
I don't agree with killing arbitrarily, but if the child would grow to lead a crap life, then spare it the trouble and kill it. Not to mention the possibility of the birth worsening the mother's life...
07 Nov 06
Originally posted by chancremechanicAbortion is killing a living thing but then so is cutting off your finger or eating yogurt. Abortion is NOT murder or manslaughter because the law says it's not -- period.
Firstly, the "child" in question represents life! To end life is to kill....look it up in the dictionary...an egg represents a "living" unborn chicken.
07 Nov 06
Originally posted by JRamboI was not refering to a foetus, I was refering to an actual child. If you will not love the child you should not bring it into the world.
Firstly, the "child" in question has yet to be proven (at least, to my knowledge) to qualify as a child. That's like calling an "egg" a "chicken".
Now, as for the love thing. If a woman is prepared to kill the feotus, I fail to see how making her endure the remaining pregnancy will inspire any love for the child in the first place.
07 Nov 06
Originally posted by JRamboHow can one preconceive that said child would live a miserable life? He/she may invent a cure for stupidity...doubtful, but one never knows....screw the mother! She should have kept her legs unspread!
Of course it's killing. So is shooting a horse with a broken leg.
I don't agree with killing arbitrarily, but if the child would grow to lead a crap life, then spare it the trouble and kill it. Not to mention the possibility of the birth worsening the mother's life...