26 Oct 21
@shavixmir saidI guess we all ignore the Metalic
Nearly a beach boys’ song!
I guess we all ignore the Metalic
I guess we all ignore the Metal B-r-a-i-n.
26 Oct 21
@contenchess saidWas that in the maximum security bakery? The Bulls bitch, who knew.
I was a baker.
Second best job ever.
Number 1 was working at a marina.
26 Oct 21
@kmax87 saidIt’s a slippery slope, and Western nations are already well down it. The UK for example has surveillance cameras in a large number of residential areas, not only at secure facilities such as police stations and airports, and legislation to control AI face recognition technology is woefully behind.
Who is THEY?
Everyone from the NSA to Big Tech. Big Techs not so bad it just helps them with their algorithm to target your wallet more effectively. But all your data packets get sniffed whether you can read through the lines or not and because of the sheer volume of data out there, AI is increasingly being used to sift through the haystack, looking for needles(you know sh ...[text shortened]... ys when all the Patriot Act asked of you was to remove your shoes and have a TSA agent pat you down?
26 Oct 21
@contenchess saidThey wouldn’t last ten minutes with him in there.
Put sonhouse in the mental hospital.
The Rage Unit 🤭
26 Oct 21
@contenchess saidScrubbing barnacles off rich men’s yachts?
I was a baker.
Second best job ever.
Number 1 was working at a marina.
26 Oct 21
@moonbus saidI wonder too about the rise of deep fake technology and the potential to stitch innocent people up with crimes caught on camera, "proving" they did it
It’s a slippery slope, and Western nations are already well down it. The UK for example has surveillance cameras in a large number of residential areas, not only at secure facilities such as police stations and airports, and legislation to control AI face recognition technology is woefully behind.
26 Oct 21
1 edit
@kmax87 saidIt's technically feasible.
I wonder too about the rise of deep fake technology and the potential to stitch innocent people up with crimes caught on camera, "proving" they did it
Political opponents' smartphones can be hacked and compromising photos planted there in places where the end user can't find them; the people are arrested by the secret police, charged with harbouring kiddie porn or whatever, and disppeared. It happens. Pegasus is one software package which can do this, but there are certainly others as well. There is virtually no regulation of this type of software.
@moonbus saidSo using Q Anon logic, only those truly compromised by the elites on film performing despicable deviant acts get to ascend the slippery pole of power, but the true honest representatives of the people who actually do care and would make a huge difference in the life of the average joe, are the ones more likely to have "evidence" of disgusting material found on their devices. All to keep the cesspool clean.....
It's technically feasible.
Political opponents' smartphones can be hacked and compromising photos planted there in places where the end user can't find them; the people are arrested by the secret police, charged with harbouring kiddie porn or whatever, and disppeared. It happens. Pegasus is one software package which can do this, but there are certainly others as well. There is virtually no regulation of this type of software.
26 Oct 21
@kmax87 saidMakes you wonder what draining the swamp was really all about???
So using Q Anon logic, only those truly compromised by the elites on film performing despicable deviant acts get to ascend the slippery pole of power, but the true honest representatives of the people who actually do care and would make a huge difference in the life of the average joe, are the ones more likely to have "evidence" of disgusting material found on their devices. All to keep the cesspool clean.....