Go back
John Oliver: Australia's Gun Laws

John Oliver: Australia's Gun Laws

Debates

v

Joined
04 May 22
Moves
207
Clock
06 Jun 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder

I'm trying to remember way back, but didn't you post once (or more than once) about "left libertarians" like Locke -- who had a robust concept of "the commons" (contrary to more recent so-called "right libertarians" )?

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
07 Jun 22

@vivify said
As I also pointed out, there were 13 mass shootings in the 18 years up to the year the law was passed. Zero mass shootings afterward.
So break out your mass shootings graph then, but don't try to use homicides to justify your anti gun ranting. By your own stats there was a downward trend prior to the laws. A common trick of the stats liars to wangle and bend their hobby horse into something that was happening anyway.

Correlation does not equal causation.

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
07 Jun 22

@vistesd2 said
@no1marauder

I'm trying to remember way back, but didn't you post once (or more than once) about "left libertarians" like Locke -- who had a robust concept of "the commons" (contrary to more recent so-called "right libertarians" )?
"left libertarians", "right libertarians", "libertarian socialism" (from No1's spoodge site), all these things, these modifiers attached to the word libertarian mean the same thing i.e. not libertarian.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
07 Jun 22

@wajoma said
"left libertarians", "right libertarians", "libertarian socialism" (from No1's spoodge site), all these things, these modifiers attached to the word libertarian mean the same thing i.e. not libertarian.
"Not libertarian" is what you are.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
07 Jun 22

@vistesd2 said
@no1marauder

I'm trying to remember way back, but didn't you post once (or more than once) about "left libertarians" like Locke -- who had a robust concept of "the commons" (contrary to more recent so-called "right libertarians" )?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-libertarianism#:~:text=Left%2Dlibertarianism%2C%20also%20known%20as,individual%20freedom%20and%20social%20equality.

Unfortunately, Randian, extremist right wingers like Wajoma have done an effective job of hijacking the term, separating it from its classical meanings. But you can't be a "libertarian" and favor capitalism (which is based on private property, the greatest diminishment of liberty ever invented).

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
07 Jun 22

@wajoma said
So break out your mass shootings graph then, but don't try to use homicides to justify your anti gun ranting.
From the link in the OP:

"Total deaths from firearms were 521 in the country in 1996. In 2019, with the population up from about 18 million to 25 million, Australia had 219 deaths, official data showed."

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
07 Jun 22

@no1marauder said
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-libertarianism#:~:text=Left%2Dlibertarianism%2C%20also%20known%20as,individual%20freedom%20and%20social%20equality.

Unfortunately, Randian, extremist right wingers like Wajoma have done an effective job of hijacking the term, separating it from its classical meanings. But you can't be a "libertarian" and favor capitalism (which is based on private property, the greatest diminishment of liberty ever invented).
And on cue No1 posts a link to 'left libertarianism'. Why the word left? Why is it necessary to tack on that word? Because as state capitalism means not capitalism, so left libertarianism means not libertarianism.

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
07 Jun 22

@vivify said
From the link in the OP:

"Total deaths from firearms were 521 in the country in 1996. In 2019, with the population up from about 18 million to 25 million, Australia had 219 deaths, official data showed."
You're boring now. you learned your lesson about stats today, I should charge money, if you want to lie more effectively with stats you'll need to read the same book that those who don't want to be lied to have.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
07 Jun 22
2 edits

@wajoma said
You're boring now. you learned your lesson about stats today, I should charge money, if you want to lie more effectively with stats you'll need to read the same book that those who don't want to be lied to have.
Let's Review:

You saw three links, all of which showed a downward trend in a) homicides, b) gun homicides and c) mass shootings after the law was past, and all three links show those events were getting worse in the years leading up to the law being passed, including the worst mass shooting in Australia's history.

You have no argument here.

You also showed piss-poor reading compression earlier in your post. Game over, buddy.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
07 Jun 22

@wajoma said
And on cue No1 posts a link to 'left libertarianism'. Why the word left? Why is it necessary to tack on that word? Because as state capitalism means not capitalism, so left libertarianism means not libertarianism.
It's necessary because idiots like you have hijacked the meaning of the word "libertarian" and most people think of it as meaning ardent defenders of the biggest reduction of liberty ever conceived by Man: private property and later capitalism.

This has been explained to you many times, so why don't you stop using a term "libertarian" who's original meaning included opposition to hierarchal, repressive systems like capitalism and just admit what you are: a Randian who is trying to bastardize a political and economic philosophy which finds her views intolerable.

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
07 Jun 22

@no1marauder said
It's necessary because idiots like you have hijacked the meaning of the word "libertarian" and most people think of it as meaning ardent defenders of the biggest reduction of liberty ever conceived by Man: private property and later capitalism.

This has been explained to you many times, so why don't you stop using a term "libertarian" who's original meaning included op ...[text shortened]... n who is trying to bastardize a political and economic philosophy which finds her views intolerable.
You keep using left-libertarian, and socialist libertarian and communist libertarian, you're welcome to them all.

In a libertarian society you're free to get together on your commune and to create your 'free' healthcare and 'free' education dream feelings. And they would be free in real terms because you wouldn't be able to force them on anyone, all participants would be voluntary. You wouldn't be able to hold the threat of force over anyone, and the word 'free' would be un-hijacked from the closet control freaks.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
07 Jun 22

@wajoma said
You keep using left-libertarian, and socialist libertarian and communist libertarian, you're welcome to them all.

In a libertarian society you're free to get together on your commune and to create your 'free' healthcare and 'free' education dream feelings. And they would be free in real terms because you wouldn't be able to force them on anyone, all participants would be v ...[text shortened]... hreat of force over anyone, and the word 'free' would be un-hijacked from the closet control freaks.
Private property and capitalism have always been based on government force, without which they could not exist. Anyone who laughably considers either a source of "liberty" is uneducated and/or delusional. No society based on libertarian principles would tolerate such repressive, hierarchal systems.

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
07 Jun 22
4 edits

@no1marauder said
Private property and capitalism have always been based on government force, without which they could not exist. Anyone who laughably considers either a source of "liberty" is uneducated and/or delusional. No society based on libertarian principles would tolerate such repressive, hierarchal systems.
Ahh that's clarified the root of your confusion, libertarians believe there is a role for the state but it is limited to police, justice and defence. You're all mixed up on some kind of whacky anarchism trip.

edit: Perhaps we need another term that distinguishes No1s idea from actual Libertarianism, something along the lines: left socialist libertarian anarchist communist libertarianism. That clears that up then.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89790
Clock
07 Jun 22

@wajoma said
Ahh that's clarified the root of your confusion, libertarians believe there is a role for the state but it is limited to police, justice and defence. You're all mixed up on some kind of whacky anarchism trip.

edit: Perhaps we need another term that distinguishes No1s idea from actual Libertarianism, something along the lines: left socialist libertarian anarchist communist libertarianism. That clears that up then.
You’ve lost multiple debates in one thread.
Bugger off and weep.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
07 Jun 22

@wajoma said
Ahh that's clarified the root of your confusion, libertarians believe there is a role for the state but it is limited to police, justice and defence. You're all mixed up on some kind of whacky anarchism trip.
Randians like yourself want the State to use the police to enforce existing divisions of property created by use of force. What you consider "justice" is a myriad of laws and practices which protect the wealth of the few and keep the State's boot on the neck of the worker.

The State is an apparatus to serve the ruling elite, generally by creating or maintaining certain economic monopolies - like:

(1) the power to issue credit and currency, the basis of capitalist banking;
(2) land and buildings, the basis of landlordism;
(3) productive tools and equipment, the basis of industrial capitalism;
(4) ideas and inventions, the basis of copyright and patent ("intellectual property"😉 royalties.

http://www.spunk.org/library/intro/faq/sp001547/secB3.html#secb32

No Libertarian can support the existence of a centralized State who's raison d'etre is the protection of the powerful and the subjugation of the rest.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.