@no1marauder
I'm trying to remember way back, but didn't you post once (or more than once) about "left libertarians" like Locke -- who had a robust concept of "the commons" (contrary to more recent so-called "right libertarians" )?
07 Jun 22
@vivify saidSo break out your mass shootings graph then, but don't try to use homicides to justify your anti gun ranting. By your own stats there was a downward trend prior to the laws. A common trick of the stats liars to wangle and bend their hobby horse into something that was happening anyway.
As I also pointed out, there were 13 mass shootings in the 18 years up to the year the law was passed. Zero mass shootings afterward.
Correlation does not equal causation.
07 Jun 22
@vistesd2 said"left libertarians", "right libertarians", "libertarian socialism" (from No1's spoodge site), all these things, these modifiers attached to the word libertarian mean the same thing i.e. not libertarian.
@no1marauder
I'm trying to remember way back, but didn't you post once (or more than once) about "left libertarians" like Locke -- who had a robust concept of "the commons" (contrary to more recent so-called "right libertarians" )?
@vistesd2 saidhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-libertarianism#:~:text=Left%2Dlibertarianism%2C%20also%20known%20as,individual%20freedom%20and%20social%20equality.
@no1marauder
I'm trying to remember way back, but didn't you post once (or more than once) about "left libertarians" like Locke -- who had a robust concept of "the commons" (contrary to more recent so-called "right libertarians" )?
Unfortunately, Randian, extremist right wingers like Wajoma have done an effective job of hijacking the term, separating it from its classical meanings. But you can't be a "libertarian" and favor capitalism (which is based on private property, the greatest diminishment of liberty ever invented).
07 Jun 22
@wajoma saidFrom the link in the OP:
So break out your mass shootings graph then, but don't try to use homicides to justify your anti gun ranting.
"Total deaths from firearms were 521 in the country in 1996. In 2019, with the population up from about 18 million to 25 million, Australia had 219 deaths, official data showed."
07 Jun 22
@no1marauder saidAnd on cue No1 posts a link to 'left libertarianism'. Why the word left? Why is it necessary to tack on that word? Because as state capitalism means not capitalism, so left libertarianism means not libertarianism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-libertarianism#:~:text=Left%2Dlibertarianism%2C%20also%20known%20as,individual%20freedom%20and%20social%20equality.
Unfortunately, Randian, extremist right wingers like Wajoma have done an effective job of hijacking the term, separating it from its classical meanings. But you can't be a "libertarian" and favor capitalism (which is based on private property, the greatest diminishment of liberty ever invented).
07 Jun 22
@vivify saidYou're boring now. you learned your lesson about stats today, I should charge money, if you want to lie more effectively with stats you'll need to read the same book that those who don't want to be lied to have.
From the link in the OP:
"Total deaths from firearms were 521 in the country in 1996. In 2019, with the population up from about 18 million to 25 million, Australia had 219 deaths, official data showed."
@wajoma saidLet's Review:
You're boring now. you learned your lesson about stats today, I should charge money, if you want to lie more effectively with stats you'll need to read the same book that those who don't want to be lied to have.
You saw three links, all of which showed a downward trend in a) homicides, b) gun homicides and c) mass shootings after the law was past, and all three links show those events were getting worse in the years leading up to the law being passed, including the worst mass shooting in Australia's history.
You have no argument here.
You also showed piss-poor reading compression earlier in your post. Game over, buddy.
@wajoma saidIt's necessary because idiots like you have hijacked the meaning of the word "libertarian" and most people think of it as meaning ardent defenders of the biggest reduction of liberty ever conceived by Man: private property and later capitalism.
And on cue No1 posts a link to 'left libertarianism'. Why the word left? Why is it necessary to tack on that word? Because as state capitalism means not capitalism, so left libertarianism means not libertarianism.
This has been explained to you many times, so why don't you stop using a term "libertarian" who's original meaning included opposition to hierarchal, repressive systems like capitalism and just admit what you are: a Randian who is trying to bastardize a political and economic philosophy which finds her views intolerable.
07 Jun 22
@no1marauder saidYou keep using left-libertarian, and socialist libertarian and communist libertarian, you're welcome to them all.
It's necessary because idiots like you have hijacked the meaning of the word "libertarian" and most people think of it as meaning ardent defenders of the biggest reduction of liberty ever conceived by Man: private property and later capitalism.
This has been explained to you many times, so why don't you stop using a term "libertarian" who's original meaning included op ...[text shortened]... n who is trying to bastardize a political and economic philosophy which finds her views intolerable.
In a libertarian society you're free to get together on your commune and to create your 'free' healthcare and 'free' education dream feelings. And they would be free in real terms because you wouldn't be able to force them on anyone, all participants would be voluntary. You wouldn't be able to hold the threat of force over anyone, and the word 'free' would be un-hijacked from the closet control freaks.
@wajoma saidPrivate property and capitalism have always been based on government force, without which they could not exist. Anyone who laughably considers either a source of "liberty" is uneducated and/or delusional. No society based on libertarian principles would tolerate such repressive, hierarchal systems.
You keep using left-libertarian, and socialist libertarian and communist libertarian, you're welcome to them all.
In a libertarian society you're free to get together on your commune and to create your 'free' healthcare and 'free' education dream feelings. And they would be free in real terms because you wouldn't be able to force them on anyone, all participants would be v ...[text shortened]... hreat of force over anyone, and the word 'free' would be un-hijacked from the closet control freaks.
@no1marauder saidAhh that's clarified the root of your confusion, libertarians believe there is a role for the state but it is limited to police, justice and defence. You're all mixed up on some kind of whacky anarchism trip.
Private property and capitalism have always been based on government force, without which they could not exist. Anyone who laughably considers either a source of "liberty" is uneducated and/or delusional. No society based on libertarian principles would tolerate such repressive, hierarchal systems.
edit: Perhaps we need another term that distinguishes No1s idea from actual Libertarianism, something along the lines: left socialist libertarian anarchist communist libertarianism. That clears that up then.
07 Jun 22
@wajoma saidYou’ve lost multiple debates in one thread.
Ahh that's clarified the root of your confusion, libertarians believe there is a role for the state but it is limited to police, justice and defence. You're all mixed up on some kind of whacky anarchism trip.
edit: Perhaps we need another term that distinguishes No1s idea from actual Libertarianism, something along the lines: left socialist libertarian anarchist communist libertarianism. That clears that up then.
Bugger off and weep.
07 Jun 22
@wajoma saidRandians like yourself want the State to use the police to enforce existing divisions of property created by use of force. What you consider "justice" is a myriad of laws and practices which protect the wealth of the few and keep the State's boot on the neck of the worker.
Ahh that's clarified the root of your confusion, libertarians believe there is a role for the state but it is limited to police, justice and defence. You're all mixed up on some kind of whacky anarchism trip.
The State is an apparatus to serve the ruling elite, generally by creating or maintaining certain economic monopolies - like:
(1) the power to issue credit and currency, the basis of capitalist banking;
(2) land and buildings, the basis of landlordism;
(3) productive tools and equipment, the basis of industrial capitalism;
(4) ideas and inventions, the basis of copyright and patent ("intellectual property"😉 royalties.
http://www.spunk.org/library/intro/faq/sp001547/secB3.html#secb32
No Libertarian can support the existence of a centralized State who's raison d'etre is the protection of the powerful and the subjugation of the rest.