They teamed up to make a vaccine. Guess what they both have in common.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/541165-merck-to-help-make-johnson-johnson-vaccine
I'll give you a hint. Vioxx and baby powder.
Should they be allowed to make vaccines and have immunity from lawsuits?
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/video/1986-the-act/
@metal-brain saidCan you find a drug manufacturer with no record of product recalls?
They teamed up to make a vaccine. Guess what they both have in common.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/541165-merck-to-help-make-johnson-johnson-vaccine
I'll give you a hint. Vioxx and baby powder.
Should they be allowed to make vaccines and have immunity from lawsuits?
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/video/1986-the-act/
@metal-brain saidWe’ve had this discussion, ultimately individual governments clear vaccines for use, ultimately they will have to foot the compensation bill.
They teamed up to make a vaccine. Guess what they both have in common.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/541165-merck-to-help-make-johnson-johnson-vaccine
I'll give you a hint. Vioxx and baby powder.
Should they be allowed to make vaccines and have immunity from lawsuits?
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/video/1986-the-act/
Threat of legal sanctions would result in no ground breaking innovations including vaccines, they would just stick to basic tried and tested symptom relief.
@Metal-Brain
Look, man...
Merck is not helping to design the product, they are only being asked to help J&J manufacture it, so there will be more of it.
President Biden will announce Tuesday that Merck will help make Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine, administration officials said, a partnership between rival companies that could help produce more doses.
😴 😴 😴 😴 😴
@divegeester saidRecalls? It is more than that.
Can you find a drug manufacturer with no record of product recalls?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-merck-vioxx-settlement-idUSL0929726620071109
https://nypost.com/2020/10/05/johnson-johnson-to-pay-more-than-100-million-over-baby-powder-lawsuits/
Think about all of the mothers that were putting cancer powder on their babies bottoms not knowing it was dangerous and J&J did. It should be offensive to all people, but especially to any mother who has a child.
@kevcvs57 saidTaxpayer money is used by the government to fund vaccine courts. American taxpayers pay it. You act like government is some money tree that gives without taxing people.
We’ve had this discussion, ultimately individual governments clear vaccines for use, ultimately they will have to foot the compensation bill.
Threat of legal sanctions would result in no ground breaking innovations including vaccines, they would just stick to basic tried and tested symptom relief.
"Threat of legal sanctions would result in no ground breaking innovations including vaccines"
Both of them were liable for the drugs and talcum powder and it didn't stop innovations. If vaccines are an exception then logic would dictate every vaccine manufacturer in the entire world has exemption from lawsuits. Is that the case? If not, prove innovation has been stifled in countries where vaccine makers are still liable.
@earl-of-trumps saidThat still leaves J&J and their cancer causing powder they let mothers but on their babies bottoms.....and people wonder why we have a cancer epidemic. Children were being primed for cancer later in life by early exposure.
@Metal-Brain
Look, man...
Merck is not helping to design the product, they are only being asked to help J&J manufacture it, so there will be more of it.
President Biden will announce Tuesday that Merck will help make Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine, administration officials said, a partnership between rival companies that could help produce more doses.
😴 😴 😴 😴 😴
@Metal-Brain
So that means Merk and J&J should not combine forces to manufacture the vaccine. Got it.
@metal-brain saidLol talcum powder is hardly a life saving innovation is it MB.
Taxpayer money is used by the government to fund vaccine courts. American taxpayers pay it. You act like government is some money tree that gives without taxing people.
"Threat of legal sanctions would result in no ground breaking innovations including vaccines"
Both of them were liable for the drugs and talcum powder and it didn't stop innovations. If vaccines are ...[text shortened]... case? If not, prove innovation has been stifled in countries where vaccine makers are still liable.
Yes if it takes tax payers money to facilitate the development of the life saving vaccine that I took the other day then I, as a taxpayer of about 48 years, am quite happy about that.
One solution would be to tax the crap out of big pharma whilst taking an honest assessment of their R & D costs into account.
@kevcvs57 saidTalcum powder is a cancer causing event to you fool. Try to convince women that hiding the cancer causing nature of talcum powder is not a big deal because babies are disposable. They put it on their babies bottoms. Do you think they would have done that if they knew it would cause cancer?
Lol talcum powder is hardly a life saving innovation is it MB.
Yes if it takes tax payers money to facilitate the development of the life saving vaccine that I took the other day then I, as a taxpayer of about 48 years, am quite happy about that.
One solution would be to tax the crap out of big pharma whilst taking an honest assessment of their R & D costs into account.
@Metal-Brain
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/talcum-powder-and-cancer.html
This report refutes what you claim. But OF COURSE that makes it fake news.
SOME talcum powder in the past contained a small amount of asbestos which is a known cancer cause but the risk for pure talcum powder is very low, you are making a mountain out of a mole hill.
But what else is new?
@metal-brain saidWell then, attack J&J. You complicate it dragging Merck into it.,
That still leaves J&J and their cancer causing powder they let mothers but on their babies bottoms.....and people wonder why we have a cancer epidemic. Children were being primed for cancer later in life by early exposure.
@earl-of-trumps saidMerck should not be making vaccines or having anything to do with making things while not being liable. They have demonstrated they cannot be trusted.
Well then, attack J&J. You complicate it dragging Merck into it.,
If you don't support repealing the 1986 act you should make exceptions for those that knowingly sold products they knew were unsafe. You have to draw the line somewhere. If the mafia made vaccines would that be okay?
@Metal-Brain
I don't know anything about the 1986 act. That is all up to the congress to repeal.
Shutting down J&J here is like cutting off your nose to spite your face. The country needs the vax.