111d
@KellyJay saidNo, she was vilified for one reason. She dared to run against Trump.
When governments treat one side one way and the other another you get politics in the jurisprudence, lawfare happens all the time around the world.
If you think Hillary was treated the same way as Trump then nothing I can say will change your mind you have been indoctrinated!
Trump is vilified because that is who he is. BIG difference. If convictions don't bother you, it says more about you than us. Those who see who he is cannot let him continue to use and confuse his base. I'm sure you are familiar with what "doing the right thing" means. To him, "doing the right thing" only means letting him victimize whomever he wants. You would give him a throne to make that entirely legal.
"In the village of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."
We can see who he is, even if you cannot.
@Mott-The-Hoople
Oh? I thought being called black or the N word was true for whitey if that person had only 1/10th black in him or her.
So now 50% is not enough. So I guess she is not Asian either, since it also is 50%.
Don't worry, we know you hate them all, Whitey is by your definition WAY more advanced in every way over those subhuman dark skinned 'people'.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidExcept your "facts" are always, ALWAYS masked racism.
you are a racist that likes to accuse others of racism when they comment on facts, not race
And a lot of times, you don't even bother to mask them.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidThanks for that ignorant answer.
she is not black, neither is barry sorento...they are mixed race
If one is half black, half Asian, they are black AND Asian.
Thinking that one must have a certain percentage of a race before they are considered that race is a throwback to your spiritual ancestors, the southern democrat slave-owners. Yes, a racist idea.
What truck did you just fall off of again? Turnips, was it?
111d
@sonhouse saidThey got this thinking from their Orange Jesus.
@Mott-The-Hoople
Oh? I thought being called black or the N word was true for whitey if that person had only 1/10th black in him or her.
So now 50% is not enough. So I guess she is not Asian either, since it also is 50%.
Don't worry, we know you hate them all, Whitey is by your definition WAY more advanced in every way over those subhuman dark skinned 'people'.
"I'm always right, no matter what."
111d
@Suzianne saidSo all of the things the FBI lied about what she did?
No, she was vilified for one reason. She dared to run against Trump.
Trump is vilified because that is who he is. BIG difference. If convictions don't bother you, it says more about you than us. Those who see who he is cannot let him continue to use and confuse his base. I'm sure you are familiar with what "doing the right thing" means. To him, "doing the right thin ...[text shortened]... In the village of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."
We can see who he is, even if you cannot.
111d
@sonhouse saidYou don’t recall the when the FBI gave a news conference and outlined all the things she did. From destroying evidence and a host of other things and saying after the list of infractions, not charging her?
@KellyJay
Give me the report where the FBI claims she lied, what agent said that, what department and such.
Why is it you are incapable of even acknowledge or believe Trump lies?
111d
@Suzianne saidSo anyone can be from any race towards any other.
"A person who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized."
I don't like anything about them and I dislike everything about them. There is no room for them in any civilized society. If one mistreats his brother, he has no claim to any preferential treatment.
Given the definition, I think it is clear what makes one a racist.
@KellyJay saidActually, the FBI specifically said she didn't destroy evidence as I have shown on this board at least a hundred times:
You don’t recall the when the FBI gave a news conference and outlined all the things she did. From destroying evidence and a host of other things and saying after the list of infractions, not charging her?
"I should add here that we found no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them."
"In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."
https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
You can give up on this fairy tale now.