Mark of the Beast

@jimm619 said
Aw' c'mon, rumble?.....Again......pleeeze
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE -----FAKE NEWS
Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, False Information, Lack of Transparency
Overall, we rate Rumble Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of right-wing propaganda and conspiracy theories and false information, use of poor sources, and a lack of transparency.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rumble/

@metal-brain said
You need to prove they are fake. You cannot do that with a fake fact checker with no credentials to check facts. Democrat biased opinion pieces do not represent facts.

Prove something false if you are capable, but attacking the source tactics are an overt failure on your part.

@jimm619 said
TRY THESE SITES FOR FACTUAL NEWS
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/center/

@metal-brain said
mediabiasfactcheck is a questionable source.

You have failed to prove anything from my source wrong. Citing an opinion piece doesn't prove anything. MIT is working on it and Bill Gates funded it. Those are facts you are in denial of. It must pain you to not be able to prove it wrong.

@jimm619 said
Do you actually believe,
that Bill Gates has been
injected with a 'satanic' microchip?

@metal-brain said
Kevin McHugh from MIT said so.

https://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218

What does mediabiasfactcheck say about MIT? Is MIT fake news too?

@jimm619 said
As I said, Media Bias/Fact Check is an impartial fact checker.
PRO-SCIENCE
These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and s ...[text shortened]... question.
Do you actually believe,
that Bill Gates has been
injected with a 'satanic' microchip?

@metal-brain said
So I take it you believe it now that MIT said so.

https://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218

@jimm619 said
Don't change the subject;
You want me to repeat my question?
Do you believe, personally, that,
Bill Gates has been injected with a
SATANIC MICROCHIP?

@metal-brain said
Don't change the subject;
Do you accept MIT is reporting facts about itself? Your own opinion piece says it is a good source. Do you believe it now?

Stop changing the subject to evade my question. Do you accept it now?

@jimm619 said
I accept MIT, NOT RUMBLE
Now a YES or NO answer,
stop evading the question.......
Do you actually believe,
that Bill Gates has been
injected with a 'satanic' microchip?

And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name.

I guess they could put it on the left hand instead. Then the prophecy would not be accurate. No one will be able to buy or to sell without the quantum dot tattoo. Complete control.

@metal-brain said
I never said anything about Bill Gates being injected.
So you accept MIT developed the quantum dot technology and Bill Gates funded it? Yes or no?

@jimm619 said
The only place that mentions
'MARK of the BEAST,' is your
FAKE NEWS SITE and YOU.
MIT never mentions 'MARK of the BEAST.'
https://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.aay7162

@metal-brain said
So you accept MIT developed the quantum dot technology and Bill Gates funded it? Yes or no?

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/01/benefits-cashless-society-mobile-payments/