18 Apr 06
Originally posted by EsotericThe world is much safer with Hussein out of power. He started two wars in that region and used chemical weapons both on his people and his enemies. If you disagree, then say so. Otherwise, start a petition to get him back into power.
The war on Iraq was brought onto you? I VERY strongly doubt that. The USA can take over the world?? I also doubt very strongly. I think you might have to re-assess the USA's capacity and realise that the USA is not as mighty as you think. If the USA cannot finish what was started in Iraq, how on earth can they take over the world?
If you don't think the US could take over the world, then you are sadly misguided. The technology the we currently use today for war was developed back in the 70's and 80's. Our fighter jets are the best in the world and they were developed in the 60's. I'd imagine we've developed other things in the past 25 years that would make what we show seem like garbage. When WW III is finally brought to frution, God help who ever is on the receiving.
18 Apr 06
Originally posted by chancremechanicNah i think they should of been ousted for sure. The Taliban were evil. I just don't agree with the method thats all.
We like to share....one big nuke picnic....he, he.....you still are shameful for not appreciating the ousting of such an evil regime as the Taliban......
18 Apr 06
Originally posted by slappy115Yes but you need more than just a d*ck to have you way with a woman.
The world is much safer with Hussein out of power. He started two wars in that region and used chemical weapons both on his people and his enemies. If you disagree, then say so. Otherwise, start a petition to get him back into power.
If you don't think the US could take over the world, then you are sadly misguided. The technology the we currently us ...[text shortened]... arbage. When WW III is finally brought to frution, God help who ever is on the receiving.
18 Apr 06
Originally posted by RingtailhunterYou clearly do have a problem with immigrants. And you seem to think that people fleeing (for their lives) from lets say, oh............IRAQ, or ............AFGHANISTAN which your corrupt country bombed to the ground is unacceptable. You call people running for their lives "inavading". They "invade" to stay alive, you "invade" for oil.
Yep, it’s kind of like drugs...no demand no supply. I have no problem with immigrants at all, but they should do it legally. My family came in through Ellis Island, New York as did most of the people who lived here before us. This is ridiculous and should be stopped immediately with deadly force if necessary. They are not citizens; they are not in ...[text shortened]... etter their own lives and that of their families, but they are doing it at our expense.
RTh
18 Apr 06
Originally posted by slappy115Except your mistaken, you didn't go to war with Iraq to get rid of Husein. You and your corrupt president went to war for the oil.
The world is much safer with Hussein out of power. He started two wars in that region and used chemical weapons both on his people and his enemies. If you disagree, then say so. Otherwise, start a petition to get him back into power.
If you don't think the US could take over the world, then you are sadly misguided. The technology the we currently us ...[text shortened]... arbage. When WW III is finally brought to frution, God help who ever is on the receiving.
And why are you so keen on entering WWIII. I think that people like you are very power hungry. You think that if we drop the odd nuke their, drop the odd nuke their that everything will be fine. You can't bomb your way to peace. Nukes will be the end of us.
18 Apr 06
Originally posted by RedjoeI am well aware of the fact that no one wins a nuclear war. By the way, to the victors go the spoils. But we will find a new alternative and hopefully reenter isolationism. The las time we did that, WW I happened.
Except your mistaken, you didn't go to war with Iraq to get rid of Husein. You and your corrupt president went to war for the oil.
And why are you so keen on entering WWIII. I think that people like you are very power hungry. You think that if we drop the odd nuke their, drop the odd nuke their that everything will be fine. You can't bomb your way to peace. Nukes will be the end of us.
18 Apr 06
1 edit
Originally posted by RingtailhunterSuper sharp shooter sharp shooter super sharp!
3. Set up guard towers every half mile or less at the borders with sharp shooters to shoot anyone who invades our country illegally.
Wouldn't mind shooting you actually. Pretty sharp.
18 Apr 06
Originally posted by orfeoThat would lead to extreme underpopulation. Not that this would necessarily be bad. What do we do with all those who are not allowed back in?
Judging by this thread, the simplest way to solve any overpopulation in the USA would be to order EVERYONE out, and then only let those back in who can pass a spelling bee.