@dood111 saidI was hoping you'd describe what happens in the scene.
Go back four posts and look at the youtube video I posted. I'm sure there's a lot more scenes that are as bad or worse.
I refuse to watch any part of "Cuties". Not because of the content that it's the movie, but I hate when films become big due to "controversy". To me it feels like I'm being suckered into watching something I would've never paid attention to other wise.
@vivify saidIt's a two minute clip and you refuse to watch it but you want us to write a detailed description of what they are doing?
I was hoping you'd describe what happens in the scene.
I refuse to watch any part of "Cuties". Not because of the content that it's the movie, but I hate when films become big due to "controversy". To me it feels like I'm being suckered into watching something I would've never paid attention to other wise.
Anything else you want us to do for you?
@Dood111
That was way worse than I assumed it would be.
Many people to blame, especially hip hop musicians who scream about women's rights and equality and then they dance like that which gives young girls the impression that it is ok to be a sex object.
Netflix is not to blame.
They are a service that provides movies. They didn't make the movie and they can't pre-screen movies to eliminate offensive material or all movies would be removed.
Movies and producers and the parents of the children are to blame.
Movies always show too much.
For example...
Why do we need to see a rape scene in a movie when it can easily be implied and the story/movie can continue without the actual visual rape scene.
The same for "cuties"
Provacative dance moves could have been implied by showing the audience's reactions instead of showing the girls dance moves.
https://codes.findlaw.com/tx/penal-code/penal-sect-43-25.html
Texas Penal Code § 43.25. Sexual Performance by a Child
(1) “Sexual performance” means any performance or part thereof that includes sexual conduct by a child younger than 18 years of age.
(2) “Sexual conduct” means sexual contact, actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sado-masochistic abuse, or lewd exhibition of the genitals, the anus, or any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola.
(3) “Performance” means any play, motion picture, photograph, dance, or other visual representation that can be exhibited before an audience of one or more persons.
(4) “Produce” with respect to a sexual performance includes any conduct that directly contributes to the creation or manufacture of the sexual performance.
(5) “Promote” means to procure, manufacture, issue, sell, give, provide, lend, mail, deliver, transfer, transmit, publish, distribute, circulate, disseminate, present, exhibit, or advertise or to offer or agree to do any of the above.
(6) “Simulated” means the explicit depiction of sexual conduct that creates the appearance of actual sexual conduct and during which a person engaging in the conduct exhibits any uncovered portion of the breasts, genitals, or buttocks.
Does the movie meet any of these points? If not, Texas has no case against "Cuties".
@dood111 saidSee the above post. If the video doesn't match what's laid out in Texas' penal code, they have no case against the movie. That's why I wanted to compare a written description of the movie to Texas' penal code.
It's a two minute clip and you refuse to watch it but you want us to write a detailed description of what they are doing?
Anything else you want us to do for you?
@vivify saidJebus just watch the video it's 120 seconds long then you can judge for yourself w/o depending on someone's description.
See the above post. If the video doesn't match what's laid out in Texas' penal code, they have no case against the movie. That's why I wanted to compare a written description of the movie to Texas' penal code.
OK here's the description....it's a bunch of 10 and 11 year old grils writhing around on stage like strippers twerking and feeling their private parts.
happy?
@vivify
11 year old girls using vulgar dance moves and presenting their bodies in sexual positions during a dance routine.
The lead dancer and 11 year old girl spreads her legs and the camera angle focuses on her junk and her arm comes down and hits her junk.
Many other scenes too but just to give you an idea since you won't watch it.
@cheesemaster saidWhen you say "her junk", are they actually showing genitalia or merely zooming in on that area? If it's the latter, according to Texas' penal code, there is no case.
@vivify
11 year old girls using vulgar dance moves and presenting their bodies in sexual positions during a dance routine.
The lead dancer and 11 year old girl spreads her legs and the camera angle focuses on her junk and her arm comes down and hits her junk.
Many other scenes too but just to give you an idea since you won't watch it.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@AverageJoe1...Does this offend you, LESS THAN AVERAGE MOE? Hey,I have an idea,.....DON'T WATCH IT ....DUH....Or is it only your
'PROUD BOYS' that are entitled to 1st Amendment protections?.
.You people are a joke'
@cheesemaster saidSummed up perfectly.
No exposure of any kind.
Sex is implied the whole time.
Texas has no case.
It's the principles really.
@cheesemaster saidNetflix made it available to the public and broadcast it , so I disagree, they certainly are to blame.
@Dood111
That was way worse than I assumed it would be.
Many people to blame, especially hip hop musicians who scream about women's rights and equality and then they dance like that which gives young girls the impression that it is ok to be a sex object.
Netflix is not to blame.
They are a service that provides movies. They didn't make the movie and they can't pre-screen movies to eliminate offensive material or all movies would be removed.
Years ago the same thing happened to a lot of video stores that had Traci Lords tapes for rent, they didn't know she was only 14, but they got prosecuted for having child porn anyway.