Go back
Obama v. Gingrich - good for the country?

Obama v. Gingrich - good for the country?

Debates

U

Joined
10 May 09
Moves
13341
Clock
20 Dec 11

Originally posted by utherpendragon
He is a bumbler and a stumbler. A stutterer and a stammerer. Its a fact. GW was ridiculous too. He said some of the stupidest things. GW is history though. You all need to get over him.
We are talking about Obama and Newt. Newt will tare him to pieces in Lincoln/Douglass style debates. Obama knows this and would never do it if Newt gets the nomination.
I've rebutted your 1 minute worth of cropped film with 2 1/2 hours worth of unedited film proving he's an eloquent speaker.

You need to break away from the carefully selected, edited soundbites from your Conservative rags and start thinking for yourself. Just because someone like Rush Limbaugh or Glen Beck grabs the back of your head and sticks something in your mouth doesn't mean you have to swallow.

utherpendragon

Hy-Brasil

Joined
24 Feb 09
Moves
175970
Clock
20 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
I've rebutted your 1 minute worth of cropped film with 2 1/2 hours worth of unedited film proving he's an eloquent speaker.

You need to break away from the carefully selected, edited soundbites from your Conservative rags and start thinking for yourself. Just because someone like Rush Limbaugh or Glen Beck grabs the back of your head and sticks something in your mouth doesn't mean you have to swallow.
Thats actually pretty funny.

TerrierJack

Joined
07 Mar 09
Moves
28919
Clock
20 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Newt Gingrich couldn't win election as a dogcatcher in a no-dog town. He has already lost his so-called lead because he did the one thing that always spoils his chances, he opened his mouth and proved he is about as personally likable as a baby-rapist in general pop. Only the fake human-cardboard cutout known as Mitt made Newt seem attractive.

(Of course, Newt was only running so he could afford to buy trinkets for his gold-digging adulteress and the rubes (Republican voters) have swallowed enough of his crap so he can bankroll a tidy profit on this whole deal. Look for Sarah to make some waves in the coming months 'cause she has a taste for easy-money now.)

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
20 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TerrierJack
Newt Gingrich couldn't win election as a dogcatcher in a no-dog town. He has already lost his so-called lead because he did the one thing that always spoils his chances, he opened his mouth and proved he is about as personally likable as a baby-rapist in general pop. Only the fake human-cardboard cutout known as Mitt made Newt seem attractive.

(Of c ...[text shortened]... for Sarah to make some waves in the coming months 'cause she has a taste for easy-money now.)
Why would a no dog town be interested in hiring a dog catcher?

Sleepyguy
Reepy Rastardly Guy

Dustbin of history

Joined
13 Apr 07
Moves
12835
Clock
20 Dec 11

Originally posted by sh76
Why would a no dog town be interested in hiring a dog catcher?
So they could claim a "created" job.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
20 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sleepyguy
So they could claim a "created" job.
😀

Kunsoo

Joined
03 Feb 07
Moves
199181
Clock
21 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
He is a bumbler and a stumbler. A stutterer and a stammerer. Its a fact. GW was ridiculous too. He said some of the stupidest things. GW is history though. You all need to get over him.
We are talking about Obama and Newt. Newt will tare him to pieces in Lincoln/Douglass style debates. Obama knows this and would never do it if Newt gets the nomination.
Newt doesn't do well under pressure. Today he told a voter that he should vote for Obama.

TerrierJack

Joined
07 Mar 09
Moves
28919
Clock
22 Dec 11

Originally posted by sh76
Why would a no dog town be interested in hiring a dog catcher?
Why would Freddie Mac hire Newt?

Answer: He'll do anything for easy money from government institutions. Republicans - keeping the welfare-queen tradition alive by crawling on their bellies like reptiles!

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
25 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Newt Gingrich has failed to qualify for the primary ballot in his home state.

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
25 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kunsoo
This editorial suggests that the match-up would force debates of a more stimulating and substantive character than debates of the past. I posted a few paragraphs. You have to take the link for the rest.

http://www.dissentmagazine.org/atw.php?id=630

I sincerely hope Newt Gingrich wins the Republican nomination for president: It could bring a healthy ...[text shortened]... y plan gives you free prescription drugs on weekends and holidays.”

More through the link
It's like asking what is better for ya, is it drinking liquid draino or lye?

Hmm? I'll go with the lyers. 😛

s

Joined
06 Aug 05
Moves
11712
Clock
25 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Newt is just a pure politician. He could not give a rats ass about the lower and middle classes or the military. A good example: About 5 years ago the Secretary of the Air Force, I forget the general's name, went up before the appropriations committee and testified that the V-22 Osprey was a poorly designed aircraft that had an inordinate number of accidents and deaths for US servicemen and that the program was too cost prohibitive. This General went out on a limb and risked his career but it was that important to him to scrap the V22 Osprey program.

Newt was instrumental in getting the committee to not scrap the program and to continue funding for it. Why you might ask? Because all of the defense contractors working on that contract, like McDonnell Douglas and Lockheed Martin, were located in Newt's home state of Georgia. He couldn't care less about the troops dying in these V22s. In return, of course, he was promised a 6 figure a year salary as a "consultant" for those same defense contractors after he retires from government. Between that and him receiving monies from Freddie Mac, its all about using your position to make the $$ for you or your district....with him as president I could not imagine things getting any better. I say vote ALL incumbents out of office.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26754
Clock
25 Dec 11
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by steve645
Newt is just a pure politician. He could not give a rats ass about the lower and middle classes or the military. A good example: About 5 years ago the Secretary of the Air Force, I forget the general's name, went up before the appropriations committee and testified that the V-22 Osprey was a poorly designed aircraft that had an inordinate number of accide ent I could not imagine things getting any better. I say vote ALL incumbents out of office.
The Osprey is a fantastic aircraft. It is not poorly designed. However as with all VTOL airplanes, it is complex and does have many accidents. The Harrier is the same way, but the Marines love these types of aircraft anyway.

finnegan
GENS UNA SUMUS

Joined
25 Jun 06
Moves
64930
Clock
25 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
The Osprey is a fantastic aircraft. It is not poorly designed. However as with all VTOL airplanes, it is complex and does have many accidents. The Harrier is the same way, but the Marines love these types of aircraft anyway.
Ah those good ol' marines like to go with a bang! What a great bunch. Let them have their Ospreys.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26754
Clock
25 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://www.lexingtoninstitute.org/v-22-is-the-safest-most-survivable-rotorcraft-the-marines-have?a=1&c=1171

TerrierJack

Joined
07 Mar 09
Moves
28919
Clock
25 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
http://www.lexingtoninstitute.org/v-22-is-the-safest-most-survivable-rotorcraft-the-marines-have?a=1&c=1171
I'm sure the 'Lexington Institute' is a completely non-biased observer that yearly releases all their sources of funding and none of them are ever from defense contractors (and Newt would never cheat on his wife.)

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.