Originally posted by TheBloopIt is an example to illustrate a point.
Obama is tying the unemployment situation to the creation of ATMs. So his "point" is NOT correct. The unemployment rate has not been over 9% for this long because of ATM machines and airport ticket kisoks, regardless of what you're being fed by Chris Matthews.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraSorry, I just edited the post you quoted, so I'll repost the last part:
It is an example to illustrate a point.
There are no technological breakthroughs during the past two and a half years that have caused unemployment to skyrocket.
Technology advancements are NOT the problem here.
Originally posted by TheBloopI agree. The main problems are the severe undertaxation of the rich, a horribly inefficient health care system, lacking education funding and bloated military spending. That is why redundant manufacturing jobs have not been replaced with services jobs even though they could very easily have been.
Sorry, I just edited the post you quoted, so I'll repost the last part:
There are no technological breakthroughs during the past two and a half years that have caused unemployment to skyrocket.
Technology advancements are NOT the problem here.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraThose are certainly factors that contribute but you ignored the primary factor, trade with China (and others) without protectionist policies to keep jobs here.
I agree. The main problems are the severe undertaxation of the rich, a horribly inefficient health care system, lacking education funding and bloated military spending. That is why redundant manufacturing jobs have not been replaced with services jobs even though they could very easily have been.
Originally posted by Metal BrainDo you think US states ought to be able to put tariffs on imported goods from other US states? By the way, the US does implement protectionist policies against China, as does the EU.
Those are certainly factors that contribute but you ignored the primary factor, trade with China (and others) without protectionist policies to keep jobs here.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraThe states can compete with each other without protectionist measures. We can't compete with Chinese labor without protectionism except with certain products that don't amount to much.
So if Texas and New Mexico would implement protectionist measures against each other, both states would benefit?
Can you compete with slave like wages?
Originally posted by Metal BrainEconomics is not about competing, it's about cooperating. The US can guarantee full employment with a few simple measures without having to depress consumer demand by increasing tariffs on Chinese goods.
The states can compete with each other without protectionist measures. We can't compete with Chinese labor without protectionism except with certain products that don't amount to much.
Can you compete with slave like wages?
Originally posted by KazetNagorraI don't thing you understand what is happening here, but since you live in Europe it does not surprise me.
Economics is not about competing, it's about cooperating. The US can guarantee full employment with a few simple measures without having to depress consumer demand by increasing tariffs on Chinese goods.
I'll ask what your simple solution is though.
How?
Originally posted by KazetNagorrawow you got all the answers and know everything you should go into politics.
Economics is not about competing, it's about cooperating. The US can guarantee full employment with a few simple measures without having to depress consumer demand by increasing tariffs on Chinese goods.
Have you ever been employed ?