19 Sep 17
Originally posted by @eladarI tried to take it but it would not accept my answers in the comments box, tried several different ways to describe but came back each time. I gave up.
Intuitive people vs Sensory people.
https://personalityhacker.com/how-are-sensors-and-intuitives-different/
70 percent of people are sensory but most smart people are intuitive. When they say smart, many times it is how well do you see patterns.
Sensory people deal well with reality. Sensory people have common sense. Intuitive people do not have c ...[text shortened]... e here.
It also links to politics I think. Sensors can see how intuitive theories won't work.
Originally posted by @eladarI'm a strong N in that dimension. I'm probably a Briggs-Myers INTP (though perhaps INTJ).
Intuitive people vs Sensory people.
https://personalityhacker.com/how-are-sensors-and-intuitives-different/
70 percent of people are sensory but most smart people are intuitive. When they say smart, many times it is how well do you see patterns.
Sensory people deal well with reality. Sensory people have common sense. Intuitive people do not have c ...[text shortened]... e here.
It also links to politics I think. Sensors can see how intuitive theories won't work.
The statement "Intuitive people do not have common sense" is silly. The whole point of using the Briggs-Myers classification system is to avoid those sorts of summary value judgments to better understand others.
20 Sep 17
Originally posted by @sh76Of course generalities are not true for all individuals. For some reason you seem to miss that point.
I'm a strong N in that dimension. I'm probably a Briggs-Myers INTP (though perhaps INTJ).
The statement "Intuitive people do not have common sense" is silly. The whole point of using the Briggs-Myers classification system is to avoid those sorts of summary value judgments to better understand others.
20 Sep 17
Originally posted by @shavixmirNotice I was talking about types not where the test places you.
I'm shocked that the tool is riddled with holes.
Didn't see that one coming...
Oh. Wait. Yes. OP... yup.
Do you do better with step by step or by pattern fron the hole? Do you need concrete or can you handle only theoretical?
Of course personality is not the only factor.
Originally posted by @eladarI'm a very "smart" N with an IQ of around 120 (not great but above average); I'm super perceptive and see (accurate) patterns and connections in people data and processes.
Intuitive people vs Sensory people.
https://personalityhacker.com/how-are-sensors-and-intuitives-different/
70 percent of people are sensory but most smart people are intuitive. When they say smart, many times it is how well do you see patterns.
Sensory people deal well with reality. Sensory people have common sense. Intuitive people do not have c ...[text shortened]... e here.
It also links to politics I think. Sensors can see how intuitive theories won't work.
But I'm absolutley crap at chess.
Edit: I'm ENTP bordering J
20 Sep 17
Originally posted by @divegeesterHave you had good training?
I'm a very "smart" N with an IQ of around 120 (not great but above average); I'm super perceptive and see (accurate) patterns and connections in people data and processes.
But I'm absolutley crap at chess.
Edit: I'm ENTP bordering J
Have memorized good master's games?
21 Sep 17
If the brain is the engine and personality is the transmition, then those with intutive skills would have an easier time on IQ tests. In other words, N could be described as automatic and S would be stick.
In any case this is an explanation as to why people think differently. It seems to me that people should be taught to play to their strengths. Intuitive people intuitive methods while sensory should be taught by sensory methods.