Pfizer Documents Confirm Graphene Oxide In COVID Vaccines

@wajoma said
Can you tell me which of these statements is not true without crybabying my post to the censors?

1/ Didn't stop you from catcing wuflu.
2/ Didn't stop you from passing wuflu on.
3/ Didn't stop you from getting extremely sick from the wuflu
4/ In some cases was more harmful than wuflu
5/ Was actually fatal for some people

Shag doody can't, soothfast can't, show you're more man than either of them by making a coherent point.

All 5 of those statements are untrue for me, Owl-boy.

@soothfast said
Oh this is pathetic.

That first link to sh​itplan.com or whatever presents not a shred of evidence that graphene oxide is "in" the Covid vaccines. It's used in the manufacture of the vaccine, which is no secret.

The first picture in the "article" puts a red circle around a blob, kind of "suggesting" it must be a graphene oxide molecule found in a blood sample, but. ...[text shortened]... my wallet, I'm ready to trade in my tin foil tricorn for a full-body Faraday cage!

WHOO!

"That first link to sh​itplan.com or whatever presents not a shred of evidence that graphene oxide is "in" the Covid vaccines. It's used in the manufacture of the vaccine, which is no secret."

No secret? This is the first time I have heard it.
What is your source of information?

@soothfast said
Oh this is pathetic.

That first link to sh​itplan.com or whatever presents not a shred of evidence that graphene oxide is "in" the Covid vaccines. It's used in the manufacture of the vaccine, which is no secret.

The first picture in the "article" puts a red circle around a blob, kind of "suggesting" it must be a graphene oxide molecule found in a blood sample, but. ...[text shortened]... my wallet, I'm ready to trade in my tin foil tricorn for a full-body Faraday cage!

WHOO!

You're a true believer happy clapper state worshipper.

Who is this 'cure' being marketed to?

1/ People that refused to take the juice?
2/ People that did take the juice, that believed the snake oil salesmen, are now having second thoughts and trying any whacky remedy they can get their hands on to get the poison out of their body. You see you can't make fun of people that take these cures because they already believed in the seizure syrup, that's why they're in this position.

Well played.

(Not you)

@divegeester said
There are dozens and dozens of studies and reports showing that the covid vaccines reduced symptoms and death rates and that the risk associated with having the vaccines were extremely small.

I really don’t know what you are up a pole about.

If they are so safe why don't they give up the limited liability so they can be sued?

https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546

If they are so safe why doesn't Pfizer make the FDA approved Comirnaty available to the public? They will only make EUA vaccine available for the limited liability. Why are they going through so much trouble to make sure they cannot be sued if they are really safe?

The answer is they are NOT safe. All of their actions point to that.

@suzianne said
All 5 of those statements are untrue for me, Owl-boy.

The sky is blue and I've got a big ass dick.

Suzi stays on form and says...

...nothing.

@wajoma said
The sky is blue and I've got a big ass dick.

Suzi stays on form and says...

...nothing.

Rachel Maddow told her that so she believes. She believes the liars because she wants to believe.

@metal-brain said
If they are so safe why don't they give up the limited liability so they can be sued?

All pharma and medical device companies protect themselves with limited liability, so do millions of other companies, it’s standard practice and doesn’t mean they are all in cohorts to cripple the human race with vaccines containing genetic altering substances in order to destabilise the global economies and bring in the new world order of lizard people.

Wake up man ffs

@divegeester said
All pharma and medical device companies protect themselves with limited liability, so do millions of other companies, it’s standard practice and doesn’t mean they are all in cohorts to cripple the human race with vaccines containing genetic altering substances in order to destabilise the global economies and bring in the new world order of lizard people.

Wake up man ffs

Stop being stupid. Nobody is claiming genetic altering crap but you.

Why did congress give them immunity from lawsuits? If vaccines were always so safe why did this bill pass if it was not corruption from big pharma? Either they are safe and it was never needed or they were unsafe and that is why they needed it passed by corrupt influence of congress.

Which is it? It cannot be both.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546

@wajoma said
1/ Didn't stop you from catcing wuflu.
2/ Didn't stop you from passing wuflu on.
3/ Didn't stop you from getting extremely sick from the wuflu
4/ In some cases was more harmful than wuflu
5/ Was actually fatal for some people

scurry away and find a definition for snakeoil salesman dolt boy.

All 5 of those statements are actually inarguably true, but it's also a good example of how one can mislead with mathematically true statements.

The reason for that is #3. The vaccine didn't "stop" people from getting extremely sick. but it dramatically decreased the likelihood that one would get extremely sick.

And that's really all that matters. Once covid isn't deadly (which it isn't for vaccinated people 99.99% of the time), nobody cares about 1 and 2.

4 and 5 are true, but the "some" is so small that the benefits outweigh the risks on balance. For the average person, the covid vaccine probably had about a 2 in 1,000 chance of saving your like and maybe a 1 in 100,000 chance of killing you. That's pretty good in the risk/benefit department.

@sh76 said
All 5 of those statements are actually inarguably true, but it's also a good example of how one can mislead with mathematically true statements.

The reason for that is #3. The vaccine didn't "stop" people from getting extremely sick. but it dramatically decreased the likelihood that one would get extremely sick.

And that's really all that matters. Once covid isn't deadly ( ...[text shortened]... e and maybe a 1 in 100,000 chance of killing you. That's pretty good in the risk/benefit department.

"For the average person, the covid vaccine probably had about a 2 in 1,000 chance of saving your like and maybe a 1 in 100,000 chance of killing you. That's pretty good in the risk/benefit department."

VAERS data collection proves you wrong.

"And that's really all that matters. Once covid isn't deadly (which it isn't for vaccinated people 99.99% of the time), nobody cares about 1 and 2"

That is not true. Anybody who supported the gene vaccine mandates cared because they thought the gene vaccines stopped the spread. no1 proved he cared even after the CDC admitted to 1 and 2 by falsely claiming they slowed the spread. He cared because he was lied to and wanted to believe the lies.

Did you support gene vaccine mandates at any time in the past? Yes or no?

@sh76 said
All 5 of those statements are actually inarguably true, but it's also a good example of how one can mislead with mathematically true statements.

The reason for that is #3. The vaccine didn't "stop" people from getting extremely sick. but it dramatically decreased the likelihood that one would get extremely sick.

And that's really all that matters. Once covid isn't deadly ( ...[text shortened]... e and maybe a 1 in 100,000 chance of killing you. That's pretty good in the risk/benefit department.

We could get into a stats battle, excess deaths, why are they happening, but all that is besides the point, and that point being there should have been zero coercion.

In NZ people have had careers and businesses destroyed, maybe it was different in the States, people in NZ couldn't eat in a restaurant or get a haircut without a vax passport.

Edit: NZhorsefacePrimeMinister

Asked by a journalist from the New Zealand Herald who asked: ‘You’ve basically said, and you probably don’t see it like this, but two different classes of people if you’re vaccinated or unvaccinated. If you’re vaccinated you have all these rights’ Ardern responded enthusiastically, nodding along as she replied: ‘That is what it is.’

Edit 2: The vid. YouTube

The US still requires the juice to travel there, (ending mid May) that is coercion when there should be none. This effects families and (in my case) employment, I could weather it, others have mortgages or business to attend to.

You don't get to set the risk/benefit threshold for other people. I don't think your stats are correct, first and second hand I know of 3 sudden deaths, 6 vax injuries and zero covid deaths. I know, I know, anecdotal, maybe you know of a bunch of covid deaths, I'll stick with what I see with my own two eyes thanks.

We still do not know what the long term effects are = experimental. That's indisputable. The state does not get to perform medical experiments on unwilling citizens.

I'm not suggesting a conspiracy, I don't credit them with that much ability, but ask yourself what would a cover up look like.

NZ Deaths

2015-2019 Average Deaths 32722 Base for calcing Excess deaths
2020 Total Deaths 32613 Excess deaths -109
2021 Total Deaths 34932 Excess deaths +2210
2022 Total Deaths 38574 Excess Deaths +5852

Up until 2023 the goobermint reports 3500 covid deaths, there's a discrepancy there

@metal-brain said
"For the average person, the covid vaccine probably had about a 2 in 1,000 chance of saving your like and maybe a 1 in 100,000 chance of killing you. That's pretty good in the risk/benefit department."

VAERS data collection proves you wrong.

"And that's really all that matters. Once covid isn't deadly (which it isn't for vaccinated people 99.99% of the time), nobody ...[text shortened]... d to believe the lies.

Did you support gene vaccine mandates at any time in the past? Yes or no?

===Did you support gene vaccine mandates at any time in the past? Yes or no?===

Never ever. Not once. Ever. I never supported a covid vaccine mandate.

@wajoma said
there should have been zero coercion.

In NZ people have had careers and businesses destroyed

That's better than lives being lost. Businesses and careers can be revived, dead bodies can't.

@sh76 said
===Did you support gene vaccine mandates at any time in the past? Yes or no?===

Never ever. Not once. Ever. I never supported a covid vaccine mandate.

Good.

The CDC said VAERS is only a fraction of adverse events that are reported.
That means take the VAERS data number and at least double it.

@vivify said
That's better than lives being lost. Businesses and careers can be revived, dead bodies can't.

Why do you only care about deaths from covid?
You can save lives by reducing the speed limit for driving on roads but those lives lost seem to mean less to you. Why?