31 Jan 09
Originally posted by bill718well, that doesn't mean that sort of behavior should be encouraged.
Why not? I had my nose buried in porn mag's since I was 13, and it did not damage me. Besides kids will see it anyway, it's all around us.😏
and if they do make it legal, I think it should be regulated.
02 Feb 09
Originally posted by generalissimoI agree. We don't want this sending it out willy-nilly business to increase.
well, that doesn't mean that sort of behavior should be encouraged.
and if they do make it legal, I think it should be regulated.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7864733.stm
02 Feb 09
3 edits
Originally posted by generalissimoIf they lower the age at which porn can be legally made, it will only mean that the hold that blackmailers have on many politicians will simply vanish which could only mean that a sicker form of paedophilia will be trafficked in order for the power elite to maintain and control their hold over those in power. So no, if anything the legal age of porn participation should be increased to say 21, like the way public drinking is enforced in the US.
well, that doesn't mean that sort of behavior should be encouraged.
and if they do make it legal, I think it should be regulated.
02 Feb 09
Originally posted by kmax87well, I don't think it should be increased, I think its fine as it is now (18).
If they lower the age at which porn can be legally made, it will only mean that the hold that blackmailers have on many politicians will simply vanish which could only mean that a sicker form of paedophilia will be trafficked in order for the power elite to maintain and control their hold over those in power. So no, if anything the legal age of porn participation should be increased to say 21, like the way public drinking is enforced in the US.
and as I have said before, Im against lowering the age because it would sexualise teenagers even more than they already are.