Go back
Public Works May Bear Bush's Name

Public Works May Bear Bush's Name

Debates

t

Joined
21 Feb 04
Moves
20783
Clock
09 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Any problems with naming a sewage plant after Bush?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/san-francisco-to-vote-on-naming-sewer-after-george-bush-855433.html

h

Cosmos

Joined
21 Jan 04
Moves
11184
Clock
10 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by treetalk
Any problems with naming a sewage plant after Bush?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/san-francisco-to-vote-on-naming-sewer-after-george-bush-855433.html
Well, he is certainly full of it.

W

Joined
03 Jun 08
Moves
401
Clock
10 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

LOL

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
10 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by treetalk
Any problems with naming a sewage plant after Bush?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/san-francisco-to-vote-on-naming-sewer-after-george-bush-855433.html
This is another example of Bush Derangement Syndrome that all liberals seem to suffer under. They may think they are being cute, but it's pretty obnoxious and childish.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
Clock
10 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
This is another example of Bush Derangement Syndrome that all liberals seem to suffer under. They may think they are being cute, but it's pretty obnoxious and childish.
yes, it is pretty childish


whew, i agreed with him and it hurt less than i thought. 😀

kmax87
Republicant Retiree

Blade Runner

Joined
09 Oct 04
Moves
107144
Clock
10 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
yes, it is pretty childish


whew, i agreed with him and it hurt less than i thought. 😀
uh oh! .... you've just had your first gateway post experience and soon you'll be sucked into a vortex of finding everything the ritt says vaguely sensible gosh darn it even a tad common sense. But like most gateway experiences the effects eventually wear off and you'll be left shaking your head thinking that you had anything in common.

t

Joined
21 Feb 04
Moves
20783
Clock
10 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
This is another example of Bush Derangement Syndrome that all liberals seem to suffer under. They may think they are being cute, but it's pretty obnoxious and childish.
So when the weight of evidence stacks up so much that - gasp! - it is patently obvious that Bush is a terrible president and people express this ... they are suffering from a derangement syndrome?

Is it only for Republican presidents that this exists? No cases of Clinton Derangement Syndrome existed 10 years ago?

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
10 Jul 08

Originally posted by treetalk
So when the weight of evidence stacks up so much that - gasp! - it is patently obvious that Bush is a terrible president and people express this ... they are suffering from a derangement syndrome?

Is it only for Republican presidents that this exists? No cases of Clinton Derangement Syndrome existed 10 years ago?
That's because the majority of Republicans are nice, polite people.

B

Joined
06 Aug 06
Moves
1945
Clock
10 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
That's because the majority of Republicans are nice, polite people.
I wholeheartedly agree, too bad that kind is hardly represented on rhp.

t

Joined
21 Feb 04
Moves
20783
Clock
10 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
That's because the majority of Republicans are nice, polite people.
So these nice, polite Republicans never indulge in childish attacks on their president (Clinton) or hysterical lies against presidential candidates (Gore, Kerry, Clinton, Obama)?

Do the nice and polite Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Coulter etc speak for them?

t

Joined
21 Feb 04
Moves
20783
Clock
10 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Barts
I wholeheartedly agree, too bad that kind is hardly represented on rhp.
Or on the airwaves, tv or in Congress ...

s
Slappy slap slap

Under your bed...

Joined
22 Oct 05
Moves
70042
Clock
10 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by treetalk
in Congress ...
They become elected so that they can speak for the people.

t

Joined
21 Feb 04
Moves
20783
Clock
10 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by slappy115
They become elected so that they can speak for the people.
Aren't the people speaking about getting out of Iraq?

Any notion of 'speaking for the people' is a bit of a myth - it's how it's supposedly meant to work, though.

n

Joined
11 Jul 08
Moves
79
Clock
11 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I agree with der schwarze Ritter if you were president during 9-11 what would you have done?

t

Joined
21 Feb 04
Moves
20783
Clock
11 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by nfms
I agree with der schwarze Ritter if you were president during 9-11 what would you have done?
Tracked down those responsible for it instead of invading a country that had nothing to do with it?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.