12 Sep 23
@mott-the-hoople saidTell Z I that have a gun to protect myself and my family. That, the controlling leaders here want to take my gun away. While the constitution clearly says I have a right to have my gun.
yes EVERY felon is banned from owing a gun dumbass
Ask him who is right, and a bonus question …..does he have a personal independent constitutionally-protected right to carry a gun. ? Mine is a 380. Ask him what his gun of choice is?
13 Sep 23
@averagejoe1 saidBecause nationalism is oh so cool.
Does Norway have any TV worth watching? What DO y'all do,, anyway, except ice skate and monitor your contacts with Nanny government?
13 Sep 23
@averagejoe1 said9mm, of course.
Tell Z I that have a gun to protect myself and my family. That, the controlling leaders here want to take my gun away. While the constitution clearly says I have a right to have my gun.
Ask him who is right, and a bonus question …..does he have a personal independent constitutionally-protected right to carry a gun. ? Mine is a 380. Ask him what his gun of choice is?
13 Sep 23
@earl-of-trumps saidYou have heard of law enforcement, right?
most of your suggestions are already LAW
Or are you against that, too?
13 Sep 23
@suzianne saidBoy I really left that out.....right!?!? Geez.
What was your damned point, anyways?
OK, the gov of N Mexico (the 'N' stands for New) has issued an executive order about guns, which issuance is a violation of the Constitution. That's all I need to tell you, anything else would be lost. It is enough for you to ponder.
14 Sep 23
@averagejoe1 saidIs it about guns, or the Second Amendment, or is it about public safety?
Boy I really left that out.....right!?!? Geez.
OK, the gov of N Mexico (the 'N' stands for New) has issued an executive order about guns, which issuance is a violation of the Constitution. That's all I need to tell you, anything else would be lost. It is enough for you to ponder.
Do you disagree that "Enough is enough"?
14 Sep 23
@suzianne saidI'll answer.
Is it about guns, or the Second Amendment, or is it about public safety?
Do you disagree that "Enough is enough"?
There are no guns in the room, just you and me and the N Mexico governor, and sitting on the table is a copy of the Constitution, with the 2nd amendment underlined. She says I do not agree with that sentence, and will issue an order in writing violating it.
It is that simple, little feller. It is not about guns or public safety.
Whew. We need new blood on the Forum
@averagejoe1 saidDo you disagree that "Enough is enough"?
I'll answer.
There are no guns in the room, just you and me and the N Mexico governor, and sitting on the table is a copy of the Constitution, with the 2nd amendment underlined. She says I do not agree with that sentence, and will issue an order in writing violating it.
It is that simple, little feller. It is not about guns or public safety.
Whew. We need new blood on the Forum
So does the NRA. They won't be happy until we return to the wild west and people are routinely shot dead in the street over a parking dispute.
And in case you've been living under a rock, I'm not a "little feller".
@Mott-The-Hoople
One tiny change: Make the purchase of guns at 21 not 18.
That stops HS kids from getting ahold of 3K bucks and buying an AR15 or some such and shoot up a kindergarten class. I guess that is too much to ask.
Or close the loophole where a proven nut case can just go to a gun show and get a gun no questions asked.
WAY too much to ask for I guess.
@AverageJoe1
Tell me who is trying to ban all guns? Funny, I THOUGHT there was this constitutional amendment about that. You know good and well the legislators, the SANE ones, are trying to get ASSAULT RIFLES out of the hands of bad folks.
AND YOU KNOW THAT so don't even GO THERE with 'they are trying to take away MY gun'' BULLSHYTE.
Tell me why an average Joe would need an assault rifle? Is he that bad an aim when he goes deer hunting he has to let loose 34 rounds before he can actually hit a deer? Tell me of laws trying to take away hunting rifles. You know, the REAL ones, not assault rifles.
15 Sep 23
@suzianne saidTwo things. You libs say it is OK to refer to people with off-the-wall monikers, like it is OK for us to call male swimmers girls. So AvJoe can call you a feller.
Do you disagree that "Enough is enough"?
So does the NRA. They won't be happy until we return to the wild west and people are routinely shot dead in the street over a parking dispute.
And in case you've been living under a rock, I'm not a "little feller".
Secondly, I never did agree or disagree with your funny little question ‘is enough enough’. It would be nice if you would write a normal question because I don’t even understand what you wrote now that I looked at it.
I may have understood it better if you had said, ‘enough is enough, right?’ Except unfortunately, I still would not understand what you mean.
15 Sep 23
@averagejoe1 saidSuzianne, I am asking you nicely to respond to this post. It is very simple, what do you think about the governor ignoring the second amendment. Why can you not answer a question. If you think you might say something funny, do you think someone reading your post laughs, and then, is that worth it to you, especially if you don’t know whether they laughed or not?
I'll answer.
There are no guns in the room, just you and me and the N Mexico governor, and sitting on the table is a copy of the Constitution, with the 2nd amendment underlined. She says I do not agree with that sentence, and will issue an order in writing violating it.
It is that simple, little feller. It is not about guns or public safety.
Whew. We need new blood on the Forum