04 Feb 13
The post that was quoted here has been removedOf course I do. But I also think the membership should get to decide what and when to change. To their credit, apparently that's happening.
What kind of reception do you think I, a 40-year-old white male Republican, would receive if I tried to join the Black Panthers?
04 Feb 13
Originally posted by sasquatch672Yep. In the same way the KKK has standards.
It's a private club. Private clubs are allowed to set standards. The members of that club may choose to adjust the conditions of membership. It certainly appears as if that's happening with the Boy Scouts.
I'm sure part of the motivation was to prevent a Jerry Sandusky situation.
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperYep, that's pretty much sums up your position, if you think that homosexuality is wrong and evil, then you are just a KKK member.
No, just pointing out that "having standards" isn't necessarily a positive thing.
Neither the the KKK nor the Boy Scouts accept gay people - for the same exact reasons.
Nice.
04 Feb 13
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperNah, certainly right. If someone thinks that homosexuality is evil based on Biblical reasons, then that person is equivalent to a member of the KKK, at least in your book. Same applies to pretty much all Christianphobes.
Certainly wrong, although the concept of "evil" is a bit simplistic.
Originally posted by wolfgang59No. It was like the military. You could be gay and keep it to yourself, or you could come "out" and reveal yourself. If you did the later, then you got booted out.
LOL
So in the US prospective boy scouts have to declare
themselves as heterosexual? ... Unbelievable!
As for the Boy Scouts, it may be that parents, especially those of faith who don't agree with the gay lifestyle, don't want the lifestyle talked about in Boy Scouts whatsoever.
Originally posted by EladarSome would say that sex between two people who love each other is also OK even though the Bible tells Christians to marry before engaging in sex. I suppose you think this to be insane as well.
Nah, certainly right. If someone thinks that homosexuality is evil based on Biblical reasons, then that person is equivalent to a member of the KKK, at least in your book. Same applies to pretty much all Christianphobes.
Whatever.
I say if the Boy Scouts want to remain faith based that they should have the right to do so that that faith based parents feel better about sending their children there. In fact, why doesn't someone create an alterior Boy Scouts if that is the case? Of course, I know the answer, it is because the agenda is to normalize the gay lifestyle, so that means crushing any organization or any person that does not agree with it.
04 Feb 13
Originally posted by EladarStop with the Strawman. On *this particular issue* they are equivelant to the KKK. Tell me how I'm wrong.
Nah, certainly right. If someone thinks that homosexuality is evil based on Biblical reasons, then that person is equivalent to a member of the KKK, at least in your book. Same applies to pretty much all Christianphobes.
Originally posted by whodeyDo the Boy Scouts ban straight people who had/have sex before marriage? Nope.
Some would say that sex between two people who love each other is also OK even though the Bible tells Christians to marry before engaging in sex. I suppose you think this to be insane as well.
Whatever.
I say if the Boy Scouts want to remain faith based that they should have the right to do so that that faith based parents feel better about sending the ...[text shortened]... y lifestyle, so that means crushing any organization or any person that does not agree with it.