RFK jr. for president

@no1marauder said
Such thinking would be in line with the Framers who would be flabbergasted to know that the US would eventually have an overseas military empire with 750 bases in 80 countries (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/10/infographic-us-military-presence-around-the-world-interactive), would spend 40% of the world's "defense" spending and have a system where the President has ...[text shortened]... o send troops into combat or bomb whatever country he pleases or drone strike any person he desires.

@mott-the-hoople said
the framers as you try to speak for were not much on allowing bullshyt

@no1marauder said
Such thinking would be in line with the Framers who would be flabbergasted to know that the US would eventually have an overseas military empire with 750 bases in 80 countries (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/10/infographic-us-military-presence-around-the-world-interactive), would spend 40% of the world's "defense" spending and have a system where the President has ...[text shortened]... o send troops into combat or bomb whatever country he pleases or drone strike any person he desires.

@averagejoe1 said
I quite disagree. Their whole purpose was to protect our country. I guess you know that things are different now...you know, the muskets and stuff. So, they would today gather at the Capitol and give their advice about military, etc. They would also say to adhere to the constitution in every way, and I would LOVE to hear their response when they learn the treasury is ...[text shortened]... the day. Ha, they would say......"What Did she just say?" They would not yet know Marx, you see.

@no1marauder said
This post is so idiotic, it hardly deserves a response.

But no Daniel Boone wasn't a "Framer" of the Constitution, you moron.

@no1marauder said
Then they'd have little use for someone claiming that a country having troops engaged in combat in another country wasn't at war.

@mott-the-hoople said
you are the only idiot here that doesnt know what the word war means. You have a habit of making words mean what you want them to...the rest of the world disagrees...

@averagejoe1 said
I quite disagree. Their whole purpose was to protect our country. I guess you know that things are different now...you know, the muskets and stuff. So, they would today gather at the Capitol and give their advice about military, etc. They would also say to adhere to the constitution in every way, and I would LOVE to hear their response when they learn the treasury is ...[text shortened]... the day. Ha, they would say......"What Did she just say?" They would not yet know Marx, you see.

@mott-the-hoople said
hell he doesnt even know what war means LOL we in a bunch of them tho lol

@averagejoe1 said
I quite disagree. Their whole purpose was to protect our country. I guess you know that things are different now...you know, the muskets and stuff. So, they would today gather at the Capitol and give their advice about military, etc. They would also say to adhere to the constitution in every way, and I would LOVE to hear their response when they learn the treasury is ...[text shortened]... the day. Ha, they would say......"What Did she just say?" They would not yet know Marx, you see.

@no1marauder said
The Constitution authorized Congress to pass Bankruptcy laws and colonial legislatures often passed private bills that discharged individual debtors.https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C4-2-2/ALDE_00013181/

So the Framers weren't adverse to forgiveness of debt.

@AverageJoe1
Dont get me wrong, if a woman with six children borrowed some money to feed her family, I think the government should forgive that debt. I hope you agree with me on that. I don’t see what we would otherwise disagree on.
It seems to me that you think both the debt of beer, drinking students, and the debt of a mother with six children should all be forgiven.

@averagejoe1 said
Debts incurred by beer drinking students in college while my son worked in a brickyard.? Ask Nexis to locate that one for us , maybe it is buried inside an article, which is inside an article, which is inside an article.

@no1marauder said
I'm not going to keep wasting my time on this with you. Your Animal House stereotypes have very little to do with the reality that sons and daughters of working and middle class families have to deal with to get an education.

@averagejoe1 said
Oh, have I gotten my facts wrong?
College graduates get a tremendous benefit from the government, but their counterparts who have never been to college get nothing, and actually have to pay for the benefit aforementioned. I am right so far, so when I say, am I right so far, how will you answer that question?