@kevcvs57 saidFunny,, you have unanswered many of mine,,,,how you gonna coach the two children who race for the same base?
Yes I find her totally acceptable.
Now you need to answer the quandary I alluded to earlier!
How in hells name could you have stood by the serial adulterer that just left the White House, but be morally traumatised by Kamala Harris?
If you do not answer the question I will keep reposting the question until you do.
And why change my question with unbelievably-natural liberaleze...Did you see the question?I am going to get Mottt to call you IDIOT!
Like you Duchess does not answer questions, but rather starts new thread about the sickening China which she adores, the torture, the works. I asked Duchess which of 2 people is more qualified to lay in state...Limbaugh a true patriot, in the Reagan vein, Reagan, who lay in state at the Capitol, or a person who is an adulteress named Kamala? Which would Duchess say? She did not. Will you?
And here you come roaring through with your kids-in-cages-mindset, or whatever in the hell, writing me back about a serial adulterer (Clinton, I presume, I don't know). You start "I find her totally acceptable" Uhh, be a good poster and complete that innocuous sentence? Acceptable for what? The question... is Limbaugh more qualified to lie in state, a patriot for starters, or is the adulteress more qualified. Duchess, stand by for back up, or at least to once again try to interpret the new answer from Kev.
Kev: You need to answer the quandary I alluded to earlier. Jesus.
24 Feb 21
@averagejoe1 saidThe 14th amendment is clear enough.
So to carry your logic. the senators, knowing that there were no constitutional provisions to convict him ( you saw the arguments, I presume??) should have CONVICTED HIM ANYWAY, for one purpose, so that it won't happen again ......whatever "IT " is.
Boy , a great reason. I teach an ethics class, twice a week. I am going to iinsert your idea in my class notes!
24 Feb 21
@phil-a-dork saidMaybe another crew of Trump supporters
He was so annoying.
will show up at his funeral and stage
another deadly riot in his honor.
@averagejoe1 saidI’m going to call you a Lying Idiot because that’s what you’ve become since your heart was broken at the polls. You used to be just plain thick but now you constantly lie about your stupid infantile questions not being answered.
Funny,, you have unanswered many of mine,,,,how you gonna coach the two children who race for the same base?
And why change my question with unbelievably-natural liberaleze...Did you see the question?I am going to get Mottt to call you IDIOT!
Like you Duchess does not answer questions, but rather starts new thread about the sickening China which she adores, the tortu ...[text shortened]... t the new answer from Kev.
Kev: You need to answer the quandary I alluded to earlier. Jesus.
I see you haven’t answered my question even though I answered your idiotic enquiry.
While we’re on the subject please stop lying about who you are and how you make a living / spend your leisure time etc. Until you can hold a half decent discussion on the subjects related to your blowhard claims.
24 Feb 21
@kevcvs57 saidA win in my column. You are a little late repeating what I’ve already said. Seems like you have come around from the old everybody gets a trophy liberal crap.😋😋🏃♀️🏃🏿🏃🏻♂️
I would congratulate the kid who got to 1st base second for their efforts and that there is no shame in coming second to a particularly fast runner.
Then without citing the incident or the player I would instigate some sprint training at the next training session.
What would you do joe kick the losers ass and keep them on the bench?
Insecure bullies like yourself shouldn’ ...[text shortened]... se who is trying to make up for their inadequacies by getting children to do their winning for them.
24 Feb 21
1 edit
@AverageJoe1
So while you are in an answer mode. Remember when you were railing on about equality. I said a 60 year old man has been cutting the grass for 30 years. Every day on a golf course. I know another guy who is retired well, and is skiing right now in Vail. So they have different economic situations. They are not equal. My question was do you find this untenable? Careful, this might be a trick question. If you answer in my way, that means each one should be free to do what they want to do and not have the government involved in anything that they do.
OK go for it. Remember Suzianne willread this, and she might not be so keen on the rich guy and the unrich guy in the same society.
24 Feb 21
The post that was quoted here has been removedCount AJie out Cannot IMAGINE talking about what other people do with balls and sticks and such. Did you know that there is a forum on sports where people do that? I think I will tell them what I think about that 3d down, I think he crossed the line of scrimmage.......by golly! Yeah, I think that, fellow poster. What do you think?
Most boring subjects of all time.