16 Jan 11
2 edits
Originally posted by badmoonHey, how about another 100 jails, is that enough for you statist control freaks?
Hell, allow 100 round clips. 200, would that be enough for you gun nuts?
As Mark Lavin once aptly pointed out, statism is the opposite of the term liberal. This is because the term liberal is the opposite of authoritarianism/statism. So to continue to call those on the left liberals is not accurate.
16 Jan 11
Originally posted by whodeyWe have too many jails. End Prohibition!
Hey, how about another 100 jails, is that enough for you statist control freaks?
As Mark Lavin once aptly pointed out, statism is the opposite of the term liberal. This is because the term liberal is the opposite of authoritarianism/statism. So to continue to call those on the left liberals is not accurate.
16 Jan 11
Originally posted by Sam The ShamYou need to lay down some short range suppressive fire for your urban assault fire team?
Here's a nify little submachinegun with a 275 round drum magazine.
God i want one soooooo bad.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYXifOyNk1s&feature=fvst
Or is it mass murder you had in mind?
16 Jan 11
Originally posted by no1marauderI agree. A well regulated militia does not need pistols with 30 round magazines. The sheer awkwardness outweighs the military usefulness.
Jared Loughner had a 30 shot magazine on his Glock which enabled him to keep shooting long after a typical hand gun would have needed to be reloaded (a revolver has 6 shots and semi-automatics used by the US military have a 15 round mag). Even some gun rights advocates (like me) have come out in support of restrictions on the number of rounds a mag can h ...[text shortened]... l really a long shot in the House? Is there any good reason to oppose it?