30 Apr 07
Originally posted by kmax87Bugger! They're good, how about some sort of compromise?
The public humiliation of pointing out my dropped 'e' might cause a counter suit by their parent company and they never lose.
Expect to be served forthwith by "Howe, Dewey, Cheatem & Wynn"
01 May 07
Originally posted by Bosse de NageHow come when I read any of T'Hayley's comments its like I can hear Harold Bishop tut tutting in he background. I thought stuffy old Englishmen were simply a product of TV drama and comedy writers, but this guy is so wet he is enough of a drip to be wet blanket of truly epic proportions.
Yes, he was elected by people that despise him. How very British.
He never Fails2 amuse me with his proper attitudes. Only he's not sending it up and thats the scary part. I cant make up my mind if he's old or just out of touch.
01 May 07
Originally posted by kmax87Probably the best attitude to take towards people like that is to assume, since you've no strong evidence either way, that xe is sending it up. There are no consequences, really, if you're wrong, and you don't have to get all cynical about the human race this way.
How come when I read any of T'Hayley's comments its like I can hear Harold Bishop tut tutting in he background. I thought stuffy old Englishmen were simply a product of TV drama and comedy writers, but this guy is so wet he is enough of a drip to be wet blanket of truly epic proportions.
He never Fails2 amuse me with his proper attitudes. Only he's not s ...[text shortened]... ing it up and thats the scary part. I cant make up my mind if he's old or just out of touch.
03 May 07
Originally posted by kmax87Yes.
Arguing over who started a particular flame war or in the case of our sometimes overly sensitive American Allies any brush or bush fires, but should people who constantly enter debates with no other set purpose but to lecture, ridicule, harangue and disparage the presenter of any given point of view as opposed to those who lecture, ridicule, harangue and disp ...[text shortened]... ritten solely to attack the player and not the play, then should those people be simply banned?
Down with Free Speech.
Let it begin here and let it begin with you Kmax.
Bannish all opposing views if perhaps you feel insulted, harrassed, or diminished.
Listening to you makes my bag drag.
Have a wonderful day.
I shall try to refrain from reading your posts in the future as there is a large scab beginning to form on the bottom of my satchel.
03 May 07
Originally posted by monster truckThat is the most sensible thing to do. The man has a large chip on his shoulder and resents opposition to his own narrow views.
Yes.
Down with Free Speech.
Let it begin here and let it begin with you Kmax.
Bannish all opposing views if perhaps you feel insulted, harrassed, or diminished.
Listening to you makes my bag drag.
Have a wonderful day.
I shall try to refrain from reading your posts in the future as there is a large scab beginning to form on the bottom of my satchel.