@Earl-of-Trumps
So in an era of OBVIOUS climate change, mainly INCREASED temperatures around the planet, just exactly what would be a negative thing about aircraft creating cloud lines which tend to REDUCE the temperature here on Earth?
This is a BAD thing? What planet do you live on again? Earl of CHUMPS?
28 Dec 19
@sonhouse saidToxic pollutants injected into the atmosphere to REDUCE the temperature on earth (if that is what it is for, I doubt it) that effect all of life negatively... This is a GOOD thing? What planet do you live on? sonhouse?
@Earl-of-Trumps
So in an era of OBVIOUS climate change, mainly INCREASED temperatures around the planet, just exactly what would be a negative thing about aircraft creating cloud lines which tend to REDUCE the temperature here on Earth?
This is a BAD thing? What planet do you live on again? Earl of CHUMPS?
28 Dec 19
@sonhouse saidWho says that is what they are doing? If that IS what they are doing, why don't they tell us?
@Earl-of-Trumps
So in an era of OBVIOUS climate change, mainly INCREASED temperatures around the planet, just exactly what would be a negative thing about aircraft creating cloud lines which tend to REDUCE the temperature here on Earth?
This is a BAD thing? What planet do you live on again? Earl of CHUMPS?
MORON.
28 Dec 19
@vmland saidI think they kicked him off and sent him here to smell our planet up
Toxic pollutants injected into the atmosphere to REDUCE the temperature on earth (if that is what it is for, I doubt it) that effect all of life negatively... This is a GOOD thing? What planet do you live on? sonhouse?
28 Dec 19
@sh76 saidNormal contrails disappear in 10 secs. or less. Chemtrails stay from horizon to horizon and slowly spread making chemical clouds. Sorta look like a stratus cloud. But they ain't.
Contrails are natural byproducts of aviation.
The thing that really gets me about these conspiracy nut sites is that there's no political organization or will even to do these even above board. That those in power have the capacity to organize carry out a conspiracy involving tens of thousands of participants to effect some enormous global meterological effort without a singl ...[text shortened]... d at least show that there's an organization capable of at least trying to deal with climate issues.
28 Dec 19
@sonhouse saidIt's the toxic chemicals they are made with. Poisoning you fool.
@Earl-of-Trumps
So in an era of OBVIOUS climate change, mainly INCREASED temperatures around the planet, just exactly what would be a negative thing about aircraft creating cloud lines which tend to REDUCE the temperature here on Earth?
This is a BAD thing? What planet do you live on again? Earl of CHUMPS?
28 Dec 19
1 edit
@Earl-of-Trumps
I'm talking about regular airline jets. The contrails cut sunlight by about 1/10th of a percent and some folks want to make that number a lot bigger to try to counteract the increase in temps because of CO2 and Methane.
I think the REAL way to counter rising temps if lobbyists keep foisting fossil fuels is to make a shield in space, a million mirrors or one BIG ASS mirror or light shield that blocks out say ten percent of the light reaching Earth.
The thing about that kind of technology is you can adjust the shielding if you go too far. Better than trying to put toxins in the atmosphere.
Of course getting us off the tit of fossil fuels will do it too but that seems to be the last thing in the world the politico's want since they are bought off by Exxon and their buddies.
Just like they are bought off by big Pharm so they can keep up being the pusher man for oxycodone.
29 Dec 19
@sonhouse saidModern aircraft do no make contrails. I have literally seen aircraft at the same height (or close to it), one dispersing trails, the other not. For the most part modern commercial/military aircraft do not produce contrails because of the nature of the engines. However, this is not the case where commercial aircraft are outfitted with aerosol dispersing equipment, and there is evidence that this is ongoing.
@Earl-of-Trumps
I'm talking about regular airline jets. The contrails cut sunlight by about 1/10th of a percent and some folks want to make that number a lot bigger to try to counteract the increase in temps because of CO2 and Methane.
I think the REAL way to counter rising temps if lobbyists keep foisting fossil fuels is to make a shield in space, a million mirrors or one ...[text shortened]...
Just like they are bought off by big Pharm so they can keep up being the pusher man for oxycodone.
This link speaks to the types of engines today's planes have.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=mRjmzy9XcaY&feature=emb_logo
We don't want to believe this is going on, but need to wake up to it because regardless of the reasons, we are being POISONED. This is worldwide.
29 Dec 19
@vmland saidSo who's behind it? The Illuminati, the Bilderberg Group, or the Jews?
Modern aircraft do no make contrails. I have literally seen aircraft at the same height (or close to it), one dispersing trails, the other not. For the most part modern commercial/military aircraft do not produce contrails because of the nature of the engines. However, this is not the case where commercial aircraft are outfitted with aerosol dispersing equipment, and there ...[text shortened]... need to wake up to it because regardless of the reasons, we are being POISONED. This is worldwide.
29 Dec 19
@vmland saidOh wow! You should have said earlier.
I have literally seen aircraft at the same height (or close to it), one dispersing trails, the other not.
29 Dec 19
3 edits
@mchill saidNo argument. Republicans have been terrible, borderline criminal, on climate issues.
It would at least show that there's an organization capable of at least trying to deal with climate issues.
sh76 - My apologies for sounding like a partisan hack, but The Democratic House has past at least half a dozen bills to deal with climate change, all of which have been sitting on Mitch McConnell's desk for a long time. Doesn't that qualify as "at least trying to deal" with climate issues??"
I meant an organization with the power to do something.
Points for effort, fine, but passing bills that get quashed constitutes trying to do something, but not actually doing something. Using contrails to bioengineer the insolation that reaches the lower atmosphere would at least constitute doing something.
BTW, I'm a contributing member of RepublicEn.
https://www.republicen.org/
Their ideas aren't a whole solution, but their point is that climate doesn't have to be a partisan issue. In other countries, it's not.
Part of the blame goes to the left for conflating climate issues with social justice so that they're hardly politically distinguishable nowadays (read the Green New Deal). But I agree that most of the blame goes to right wing leadership for purposefully sticking its head in the sand for political purposes.
29 Dec 19
@kazetnagorra saidConsidering this is worldwide, many nations I would say. Your question begs for a conspiracy theory, who has the wherewithal for such an operation?
So who's behind it? The Illuminati, the Bilderberg Group, or the Jews?