Go back
Supreme Court Rejects Texas Lawsuit

Supreme Court Rejects Texas Lawsuit

Debates

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
12 Dec 20
2 edits

Donald Trump called this "The BIG One!!"

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a lawsuit backed by President Donald Trump to overturn Joe Biden’s election victory, ending a desperate attempt to get legal issues rejected by state and federal judges before the nation’s highest court.

Now that the high court shot down "The BIG One" What does Trump do now? 😳

Donald. You'd better hire some REAL lawyers. Come January, prosecutors are going to be calling you to account for a great many things! 😏

https://www.adn.com/nation-world/2020/12/11/supreme-court-rejects-texas-lawsuit-to-overturn-presidential-election/

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
12 Dec 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
12 Dec 20
1 edit

@mchill
Wow, what a shocker. And Texas had SUCH a strong case too......
Don't worry, all this circus is for one thing and one thing only:
To get money directly from Trump's base so they WILL be launching ever more stupid lawsuits just like it in lower courts around the country.
Trump will continue to pass off his lies which his base will swallow hook line and sinker and he will continue to tweet his begging for money.
Too bad his base is so stupid they can't see evil when it appears.

G

santa cruz, ca.

Joined
19 Jul 13
Moves
376505
Clock
12 Dec 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mchill said
Donald Trump called this "The BIG One!!"

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a lawsuit backed by President Donald Trump to overturn Joe Biden’s election victory, ending a desperate attempt to get legal issues rejected by state and federal judges before the nation’s highest court.

Now that the high court shot down "The BIG One" What does Trump do now? 😳

Donald. You'd ...[text shortened]... n.com/nation-world/2020/12/11/supreme-court-rejects-texas-lawsuit-to-overturn-presidential-election/
maybe he can shack up with Kim
hope he saved those love letters

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
12 Dec 20
1 edit

The post that was quoted here has been removed
More than 60% of House Republicans support pro-Trump lawsuit overturning election results"

Now those House Republicans can add their support for a frivolous (losing) lawsuit to their resume. Yes indeed - a hat full of winners! πŸ™‚

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
12 Dec 20

@mchill
The sad part is they will get away with it, they will convince their base they were fighting the good fight even though those folks in their base could not even say just WHAT they were doing or why.
Just what America needs, 70 MILLION blind folks.
Of course it goes deeper than that, those 70 mil are the 21st century version of 1863 and they WANT another civil war, I imagine they think they can win this time and then go back to having slaves from those sub human blacks and Asians and Mexicans.

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
12 Dec 20
1 edit

@sonhouse said
@mchill
The sad part is they will get away with it, they will convince their base they were fighting the good fight even though those folks in their base could not even say just WHAT they were doing or why.
Just what America needs, 70 MILLION blind folks.
Of course it goes deeper than that, those 70 mil are the 21st century version of 1863 and they WANT another civil w ...[text shortened]... win this time and then go back to having slaves from those sub human blacks and Asians and Mexicans.
Of course it goes deeper than that, those 70 mil are the 21st century version of 1863 and they WANT another civil w ...[text shortened]... win this time and then go back to having slaves from those sub human blacks and Asians and Mexicans.

Unfortunately, there is a lot of truth to this statement. πŸ˜•

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
12 Dec 20

Waiting to hear how the mostly conservative SCOTUS (half of those conservatives picked by Trump) are the deep state.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
12 Dec 20

@vivify
Those damned TURNCOATS. OFF WITH THEIR HEADS.
I APPOINTED YOU AND THIS IS HOW YOU TREAT ME?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
12 Dec 20

https://www.theepochtimes.com/trumps-legal-team-considering-alternate-options-after-supreme-court-rejects-texas-election-suit_3615140.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-11-6

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
12 Dec 20
2 edits

@metal-brain said
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trumps-legal-team-considering-alternate-options-after-supreme-court-rejects-texas-election-suit_3615140.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-11-6
Hahaha I couldn’t read the piece in the link comrade but do get a grip.
Edit please do not post links to far right conspiracy sights that demand an email address.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
12 Dec 20

@kevcvs57 said
Hahaha I couldn’t read the piece in the link comrade but do get a grip.
Edit please do not post links to far right conspiracy sights that demand an email address.
Debate the facts instead of attacking the source. Oh, that is right. You don't ever debate. You just gaslight.

Have you ever debated anything on the debates forum?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
12 Dec 20

@Metal-Brain
Ah, so going after even more bullshyte lawsuits is just fine with you because you don't believe in democracy, you WANT a dictator. But it doesn't matter, there is NOTHING your god king can do to make a coup and ruin the democracy.

Democracy means NOTHING to you.

You would be FINE with Emperor Trump.

m

Joined
07 Feb 09
Moves
151917
Clock
12 Dec 20

@lemondrop said
maybe he can shack up with Kim
hope he saved those love letters
Asking for asylum in N Korea ? That's a good one !!
Maybe he can build a hotel. πŸ˜†

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
14 Dec 20
1 edit

The SCOTUS did not decline to hear the case based on the merits. It had nothing to do with that.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-supreme-court-backs-grand-theft-election-2020/5732065

The SCOTUS refuses to hear the evidence. If the SCOTUS will not consider evidence if Texas is the plaintiff how is the Trump legal team supposed to get them to hear the evidence?

The Trump legal team has a lot of evidence. That is NOT why the SCOTUS rejected the case. It has nothing to do with evidence.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.